1/90
WM, Dan Doherty Spring 2025
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
4 dichotomies- Different ways to categorize research
Descriptive/Casual, Idiographic/Nomothetic, Qualitative/Quantitative, Inductive/Deductive
Idiographic
Thorough explanation of a particular event incorporating “all” or as many as possible factors.
Nomothetic
Partial explanations of a general phenomenon. One or few factors to explain a general class of events/outcomes/conditions.
Intervening variables
Variable the impacts DepV and is itself affected by an IndV. Helps explain how ur X influences ur Y
Antecedent variables
An Ind V that precedes another Ind V in time and affects it.
Dichotomous Variables
Impacts of the level of a variable or the probability of a variable (Voting vs not voting)
Political Science
Identifying patterns in human political behavior, (voting, lobbying, marching, revolutionizing, etc) in political institutions (Congress, nation states, EPA), or in the social structures that relate to politics (families, internet, schools/colleges, etc.)
Theories
Zero in on one or some factors of a phenomenon and provide a casual story.
Hypothesis
A statement proposing a relationship between two or more variable OR a testable expectation that follows from a theory OR a statement that ought to be observed in the real world if theory is correct.
Conceptualization
A precise definition of a concept for the purpose of a specific research project.
Conceptualization of a variable
A precise definition of a characteristic for the purpose of a specific research project.
Operationalization
The process of developing specific research procedures that result in actual data- in empirical observations of the concept
Indicator
A sign of the presence or absence, level or amount of the concept being studied. (Are there protests? How many? How often? How large?)
Freedom
The opportunity to act spontaneously in a variety of fields outside the control of the government and other centers of potential denomination according to broad categories- political rights and civil liberties.
Political Rights
Electoral Process, Political Pluralism and Participation, Functioning of Government, Additional Discretionary Political Rights
Civil Liberties
Freedom of Expression and Belief, Associational and Organizational Rights, Rule of Law, Personal Autonomy and Individual Rights
4 Levels of Measurement
Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, Ratio
Nominal (Separate)
Different values/numbers only indicate different categories. Also called categorical
Ordinal (and order)
Different values allow us to rank or order the cases in meaningful way
Interval (and space)
Different values represent consist degree of variation
Ratio
Same as interval, with zero indicating absence of the concept
Measurement errors
Difference between the real value of an attribute and what the researcher comes up with in the process of measuring
Random vs Systematic Measurement Errors
Almost all measurement errors are systematic. Not knowing where the error is doesn’t make it random
Bad: random measurement error in Indp Variable, systematic error in DV or IV (all create bias)
Not so bad: error in Dep. Variable (no bias)
Accuracy in Measurement: Reliability
the extent to which an instrument yields the same results on repeated trails
Accuracy in Measurement: Validity
The correspondence between measurement and instrument yields and the concept it is supposed to measure
Face, Content, and Criterion/Predictive Validity
Does it make sense on its face?
Does a measure cover all of the dimensions we are interested in? Does it cover the full range of meanings included within the concept?
Does the measure help us predict things we would expect it to help predict?
Literature Review
A somewhat brief written review of the existing research and theories relevant to one topic
Purpose of a Lit Review
to discuss existing bodies of knowledge to which your research would add
Sometimes Lit Reviews… (2)
presents contrasting perspectives
describes strengths and weaknesses of that existing research
Lit Reviews Often… (1)
presents the relevant body of knowledge without contrasting or pointing out strengths and weaknesses
Population
a collection of units about which you are interested in making claims
Census
a gathering of data about all cases in a population (not often used in poli sci)
Sample (3)
a subset of the pop. of interest.
Should be representative of the pop. in its entirety.
Generalizable, externally valid.
Selection bias
occurs when certain types in a pop are more/less likely to be chosen for a sample
Probability samples
a sample selected from a population using some chance process
Samples…
allow us to make an estimate about the population
Probability samples (3)
Simple random sample
Stratified sample: choosing a demographic and dividing your pop. by it, then taking a proportional amount from each demographic
Cluster sampling: divides a population into groups (clusters) and randomly selects entire clusters for the sample
What’s important (in sampling)…
is that each unit in your pop has the same probability of being chosen for your sample
Non-probability samples (3)
Haphazard sample: go down to confusion corner and ask ppl
Purposive sample: Actively choosing an unrepresentative sample to learn more from it
Snowball/chain referral sample: find one person part of pop, and that person connects you to another person in the pop.
Non-probability samples
a sample selected from a pop not using a method based on a chance process.
Selection bias is…
almost guaranteed
Content Analysis
a procedure by which communications (words or images) are transformed into quantitive data
Ex: speeches, debates, movies, political ads, social media
2 steps of content analysis
Creating a sample
coding
sampling plan (3)
Look at every case in your universe OR
sample randomly from your universe OR
restrict universe then sample randomly.
sampling plan has a…
goal of a representative sample.
Coding
Develop a coding scheme,
be clear what your variables are going to measure,
read/watch a sample of your sample with the goal of reliability and validity.
Coding: Reliability and Validity
Intercoder reliability as a reliability test.
Learn from others to test validity
Push Poll
A poll where the intention is to transmit (typically false) information under the guise of a question.
Ways to administer and construct
Admin: self-administered, face to face, over the phone
Construct: Open ended and closed ended
Open ended questions will…
tell you a lot more info
and allows people to be fit into more accurate groups
Problems to avoid when constructing a survey (4)
choice order effect
question order effect
question wording effect
social desirability bias
Choice order effect
if you really don't care you'll probably go with the last or first one
Question order effect
previous questions may affect the cognitive response process and respondents' answers
Question wording effect
“are we spending too much/too little on welfare” vs “are we spending too much/too little on assistance the poor”
Social desirability bias
Response based on what choice is more desirable. :”did you do your civic duty and vote” vs “did you vote”
Other probs with surveys (5)
Interviewer effect
Honesty
Doorstep opinions:
Guidance
Probing
Interviewer effect
something about the person interviewing you changes your response
Honesty
Changes with the way the survey is administered
Doorstep opinions
depth of opinions
guidance
being able to ask clarifying questions
Probing
Next question is determined by previous question
Open-ended interviews
a survey that opens up
The Problem of Causality (3)
challenging to estimate a causal relationship w/o bias
A linear regression can easily show a causal relationship between two variables
A Y can have multiples x’s, but if the main x and additional variable correlate it is a problem
Lurking Variable
When a Y has multiples x’s, but the main x and an additional variable correlate AND
a variable that is mathematically correlated to the IndV of interest and has a causal influence on the DepV of interest.
Confounding Factor
another name for lurking variable
All LV’s… (3)
have to be properly controlled to estimate w/o bias.
It is difficult to control them all
Difficult to know all of them.
The main problem with causality
estimating a casual relationship without bias
How to estimate a casual relationship without bias (4)
X and y must be mathematically related (scatterplot)
Relationship must be plausible
Y (depV) cannot influence X (indV)
Control of lurking variables
When the X (IndV) manipulates the Y (DepV), and vice versa
reverse causation
Islam and Authoritarianism thesis:
Is Islam the predominant religion in a country, and if so, how does that affect the country’s degree of authoritarianism or democracy?
Islam and Authoritarianism: The main obstacle to the development of democracy
the subordination of women
Islam and Authoritarianism: The 6 controlled lurking variables
Economic development,
economic performance,
communist heritage,
British colonial heritage,
Natural resources/oil/OPEC,
ethnic diversity
Islam and Authoritarianism: Bias?
He controlled for many lurking variables, but there’s no way to say whether or not he got all of them or got the ones he got accurately. Bias has been accounted for, but his work isn’t unbiased.
Unique Essential features of experiments (2):
subjects randomly assigned to different groups,
researcher manipulates IndV of interest in the groups (doesn’t require complete control)
Bad Luck
Sometimes experiments show correlations that are just random and unassociated
Computers and Bad Luck
A computer can calculate the probability that an experiments is experiencing bad luck
Anything thats random…
is not correlated with anything else. Bad luck shows a correlation
Internal Validity
The ability of research design to estimate w/o bias the impact of an IndV on a DepV
External Validity
Ability to take research findings from one research project and validly apply those findings to a whole pop, other pops, other settings, other situations, etc.
Threats to External Validity (2)
Unrepresentative sample (a pop validity concern) [college students are popularly studied bcs we often do studies]
Unrepresentative situation or setting (ecological concern)
Primary shortcoming of Poli. Sci:
There are so many things you just can't study using an experiment
different method of creating treatment groups (2)
Simple random assignment (as the precursor)
Creates groups that are very similar
Blocking/Stratifying then randomly assigning
threats to internal validity (3)
LV’s,
History
demand characteristics (ppl find out or gain a hunch of what the researcher is studying)
X, O, and R
Treatment, Measurement of DepV, Random Assignment into groups
Classic experiment:
R O X O
Pre/Post-test:
R O O
PostTest Only:
R X O and R O
Cheaper. Participants less likely to find out
Solomon four groups design
ROXO, RO O, R XO, R O
commonly used in psychology. expensive.
Lab v Field Experiments: Lab (6)
Treatments can be carefully calibrated and dispersed better
Can isolate groups, no cross contamination
Exceptional high internal validity
Many IndV’s that can be manipulated
Questionable external validity
Demand characteristics more likely
Lab v Field Experiments: Field (6)
Maintain two necessary experimental components
Takes place in a natural setting
High external validity
Sometimes cannot carefully calibrate treatments or isolate groups
Internal validity is usually very high
Fewer possibilities
Natural Experiments (6)
Random or atleast arbitrary assignment are handled by ‘nature’ (usually a government agency)
Government sets subsidized housing price, people apply for it because they feel they need
Technically not experiments because research did not assign and manipulate
Challenging to find good ones
Challenging to track down all the subjects and to measure the depV
take s place in a natural setting
High internal and external validity