Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
central claims challenged
Pol studied changes in transgender individuals’ brains using MRI scans taken during hormone treatment
scans showed that size of BST changed significantly over that period
Kruijver and Zhou’s studies → BST was examined post mortem and after transgender individuals had received hormone treatment during gender reassignment treatment
suggests that differences in the BST may have been an effect of hormone therapy rather than the cause of gender dysphoria
there may be other brain differences associated with gender dysphoria
Rametti: studied another sexually dimorphic aspect of the brain - white matter
regional differences in the proportion of white matter in male and female brains - analysed the brains of both male and female transgender individuals, before they began hormone treatment
the amount and distribution of white matter corresponded more closely to the gender individuals identified themselves as being
not all cultures have two genders
some cultures recognise more than two genders (Samoa)
challenged to traditional binary classifications of male and female
the fact that increasing numbers of people describe themselves as non binary suggests cultural understanding is only beginning to catch up
Ovesey and Person explanation doesn’t provie an adequate account of gender dysphoria in biological females as the theory only applies to transgender women
research by Rekers found that gender dysphoria in those assigned male at birth is more likely to be associated with the absence of the father than the fear of separation from the mother
not comprehensive
Arapesh: gentle and responsive
Mundugumor: aggressive and hostile
Tchambuli women: dominant and organised village life, men: decorative and passive
Hofstede argues that in industrialised cultures the changing status and expectations of women are a function of their increasingly active role in the workplace and away from the domestic sphere
led to a breakdown of traditional stereotypes in advanced industrialised societies
traditional societies: women still occupy the role of housemaker as a result of social, cultural and religious pressures
cultural context
mead’s research has been criticised
made generalisations based on a short period of study
Freeman: conducted follow up study of people from Papua new Guinea after Mead’s investigations
he argued that Mead’s findings were flawed as she had been misled by some of her participants
her preconceptions of what she would find had influenced her reading of events (observer bias and ethnocentrism)
theoretical basis
cultivation theory: more time individuals spend ‘living’ in the media world, the more likely they are to believe that this reflects social reality
Bond and Drogos: positive correlation between time spent watching the reality programme Jersey Shore and permissive attitudes towards casual sex
still true when researchers controlled for the influence of factors like existing sexual attitudes, parental attitudes and religious beliefs
may not be a causal relationship
Durkin: even very young children are not passive and uncritical recipients of media messages
norms within the child’s family may be the bigger determinant on the child’s gender attitudes and behaviout
if media representations confirm existing gender norms held by the family then these are likely to be reinforced in the child’s mind
if not then such representations are likely to be rejected
attention
retention
motivation
motor reproduction
Smith and Lloyd: study involved babies 4-6 months who were dressed half the time in boys’ clothes and half in girls’ clothes
when observed interacting with adults, babies assumed to be a boy were more likely to be given a hammer shaped rattle and encouraged to be adventurous and active
when the same babies were dressed as girls they were more likely to be handed a cuddly doll, told they were pretty and reinforced for being passive
differential reinforcement may not be the cause of gender differences in behaviour
adults during interactions with their own children may simply be responding to innate gender differences that are already there
the observation. that boys are encouraged to be more active during play may be a consequence of the fact that they are naturally more active anyway, due to hormonal differences
partial explanation
social learning can explain cultural changes in stereotypically gender appropriate behaviour
androgyny: there exists less of a clear cut distinction between what many people regard as stereotypically masculine and feminine behaviour in many societies today
as there has been no corresponding change in people’s basic biology within the same period, such a shift is much bettee explained by SLT
shift in social expectations and cultural norms = new forms of gender behaviour are now unlikely to be punished
SLT doesn’t provide an adequate explanation of how learning processes change with age
modelling of gender appropriate behaviour is said to occur at any age
but its illogical that children who are 2 learn int he same way as children who are 9
this conflicts Kohlberg’s theory that children do not become active in their gender development until they reach gender constancy
suggests influence of age isn’t considered
some support for the role of the Oedipus complex
Freud: for boys, ‘normal’ development depends on being raised by at least one male parent
there is some support: Rekers and Morey → rated the gender identity of 49 boys 3-11 based on interviews with their families and children
of those who were ‘gender disturbed’, 75% had neither their father or substitute living with them
no father - negative impact
the relationship between absent fathers and problems of gender identity is not supported
Bos + Sandfort → compared data from 63 children where both parents were lesbians and 68 children from traditional families
children raised by lesbian parents felt less pressure to conform to gender stereotypes and were less likely to assume their own gender was superior
but no differences in terms of psychosocial adjustment or gender identity
inadequate account of women’s development
much of the theorising on girls’ parallel development was undertaken by Jung, one of Freud’s contemporaries who also produced a psychoanalytic theory
Freud admitted that women were a mystery to him and his notion of penis envy has been criticised as reflected the androcentric Victorian era during which he lived
feminist psychoanalyst Horney argued that a more powerful emotion is men’s experience of ‘womb envy’ - a reaction to women’s ability to nurture and sustain life
result of cultural factors
androcentric bias
lacks scientific credibility
Freud: criticised for lack of rigour in methods (case studies)
concept are untestable because they are unconscious
contrasts others - objective and verifiable evidence from lab studies
can’t be falsified
questions validity
evidence suggests gender stereotyping emerges around 6
Damon: told children a story of a boy who liked to play with dolls and asked to comment.
4 year olds: fine for him to play with dolls
6 year olds: wrong for him to play with dolls
gone beyong understanding what boys and girls do to gender stereotyping.
other research challenges the idea that gender stereotyping is 6 years
Bussey and Bandura: children as young as 4 reported ‘feeling good’ about playing with gender appropriate toys
they felt ‘bad’ about doing the opposite
contradicts kohlbergs theory, but supports gender schema theory
supporting research relies on unsatisfactory methods to assess gender constancy
Bem: criticised method. key test of gender constancy is whether a child understands that gender stays the same despite changes in appearance and context
but this is how we demarcate one gender fro another (through clothes and hairstyle)
best way is through physical differences, such as genitalia - younger children ‘don’t understand’
Bem study: demonstrated that 40% children 3-5 demonstrated gender constancy if they were shown a naked photo of the child to be identified first
misrepresents what children actually known
other researchers suggested there may be different degrees of gender constancy
Martin et al: praise Kohlberg’s theory for recognising that children’s understanding of gender guides bhv
point out that exactly when and how this understanding affects children’s bhv is unclear
may be different degrees: initial degree may orient children to importance of gender (choosing friends) may develop before 6
second degree of constancy may heighten responsiveness to gender norms, choosing appropriate clothes/attitudes.
gradual process
key principles are supported by evidence
Martin and Halverson’s study: children under 6 = more likely to remember photos of stereotypically appropriate behaviour than photographs of gender inappropriate behaviour when tested a week later
children tended to change the gender of the person carrying out the gender inappropriate activity was now appropriate
predicts children under 6 would do this
gender identity probably developms earlier than suggested
longitudinal study of 82 children → onset of gender identity
data from 2 weekly reports from mothers on their children’s language 9-21 months with videotaped analysis of play
key measure of gender identity: how and when labelled themselves as a boy or girl
occurred on average at 19 months - as soon as communication starts
have a gender identity before
not appropriate to argue about specific ages
suggest the key point is the shifts in a child’s thinking and ages are averages not absolutes
many children move through stages quicker/slower than others - sequence is more important
accounts for cultural differences in stereotypical behaviour
Cherry: gender schema counts culturally appropriate behaviour
traditional cultures: believe women should take a nurturing role and men pursue a career, will raise children who form schema consistent with this view
societies with less rigid boundaries - more likely to have fluid gender schema
explains how gender schema are transmitted between members of a society and how cultural differences come about.
reduced body hair
breast development
softening or rounding of body contours
long limbs, underdeveloped genitals
problems with coordination and clumsiness
poorly developed language skills and reading ability
passive, shy and lack interest in sexual activity
don’t respond well to stressful situations
problems with executive functions: memory and problem solving
don’t have a menstrual cycle
ovaries don’t develop, infertile
don’t develop breasts, have a broad shield chest
low set ears and a ‘webbed neck’
high waist to hip ratio
physically immature and retain appearance of prepubescent girls
higher than average reading ability
performance on spatial, visual memory and mathematical tasks is lower than average
socially immature, trouble relating to peers, difficulty ‘fitting in’
contributes to nature-nurture debate
comparing syndromes with chromosome typical individuals it’s possible to see psychological and behavioural differences
e.g. Turners = higher verbal ability and talk more
logically inferred that these differences have a biological basis and result of abnormal chromosomal structure
relationship between atypical chromosomal patterns and differences in behaviour may not be causal
may be environmental and social influences are more responsible for differences
social immaturity in Turner’s females → treated ‘immaturely’ by people around them
react to prepubescent appearance in a way that encourages immature behaviour = direct impact upon school performance = learning problems
application to managing syndromes
continued research - earlier and more accurate diagnoses of syndromes and more positive outcomes
Australian study of 87 with Klinefelter’s: those identified and treated from a very young age experienced significant benefits in terms of managing syndrome, compared to those diagnosed in adulthood
to identify characteristics of Klinefelter’s and Turner’s individuals it is necessary to identify a large number with the disorder and build a database
so we can see the full range of characteristics from mild to severe
but only those with most severe symptoms are identified and therefore the picture of typical symptoms may be distorted
Boada: prospective studies (following individuals from birth)have produced a more accurate picture of characteristics
many with Klinefelter’s don’t experience significant cognitive or psychological problems and many are highly successful