1/25
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Budget for hydrologic cycle
Includes river and groundwater flow
Groundwater zones
GWT separates 2 zones:
Zone of aeration (vadose) → pore space partly filled with water and partly filled with air
Zone of saturation (phreatic) → pore space entirely filled with water
Capillary Fringe → water drawn upward between grains (above water table)
Level of saturation
Dry season: water content in surface is low
Wet season: water content in surface is high
Aquifers
Aquifer → layer that can store or transmit groundwater (fer=transfer)
Unconfined aquifer → porus surface, recharge anywhere
Confined aquifer → limited recharge
Aquitard → layer that allows weak groundwater flow (tard = retard)
Aquiclude → layer that is total barrier to groundwater flow (clude=exclude)
Patterns of GW Flow
Homogeneous material (sands)
Regional discharge
Parallel flow lines
Convex water table
Inhomogeneous material (fractured rock)
Point discharge
Convergent flow
Concave water table
Flow is horizontal once water table is reached
Local GWT merges with bodies of water
Discharge points tend to be swampy (Mudspring lake, Canada) → high salts = quicksand
Liquefaction → occurs when weight of sediment is balanced by upward flow of water.
GWT rises in wet season, falls in dry season
Local vs Regional Flow Systems
Local systems are shallower & contain younger GW
Age of GW
Depends on rock properties, depth, distance, and GW flow patterns
Deeper = older (generally)
Depends on presence of aquicludes
Date water by figuring out half time of isotopes in that water
Confined Aquifers
Bounded by aquiclude layers above and below
Potentiometric surface → elevation to which pressurized water in a confined would rise if not confined.
Slopes downward away from recharge zone
Long-term changes = urbanization
Short-term = climate
Unconfined and Confined Aquifer Relationship
Unconfined aquifer can transition to a confined aquifer in the downdip direction
Darcy’s Law
Velocity of GW flow is related to:
Hydraulic gradient → slope of GWT
Hydraulic conductivity → rock through which water flows aka coefficient of permeability (K)
Hydraulic Head
Measurement of liquid pressure relative to vertical datum
Greater in confined aquifers
Hydraulic conductivity is lower in confined aquifers
Measured by piezometer
Hydraulic Gradient
Steepness of slope of GWT
Measured by difference in hydraulic head between two wells divided by difference in distance
0.0001-0.1 ft/ft
Hydraulic Conductivity (K)
Measure of ease with which water can flow through an aquifer
High conductivity = more water flows through at given gradient
sand/gravel →1-100 ft/day, clay →0.001 ft/day
K increases with permeability and density and inversely with viscosity
Testing of core plugs
Test characteristics of aquifers
1cm cylinders from drill cores
Measures porosity and permeability
Pressure Test
Testing well or aquifer response
Test hydraulic conductivity and permeability
Water use in the US
Thermoelectric Power → Uses the most but 98% returned
Agriculture → Consumes the most water
Western US uses a lot more water resources → NW more reliant on surface water, TX and Nebraska more reliant of GW
Withdrawals of GW across the country:
Snake River Valley, Idaho → Agriculture
Central Valley,CA → agriculture
Ogallala aquifer, Great plains → agriculture
Chicago → urban supply
Mississippi Delta → agriculture
South TX → agriculture
Local effects of GW withdrawal
Normally → horizontal upper surface
Localized removal → cone depression
Funnel shape that only exists while the GW is being pumped out
Regional overdraft → removal over larger area can result in drop in elevation of regional GWT
Fossil GW → water that filled aquifer and can’t be replenished
GW mining → unsustainable extractions
Chicago → water supply from GW which led to regional overdraft (800’ decline of GWT). Shift to lake MI led to recovery (rise by 100’)
GW Drawdown
Can be predicted using Darcy’s Law
Discharge increases with hydraulic conductivity and hydraulic gradient
Gulf Coastal Plain Aquifer
Tx to Fl
Water withdraw from aquifer caused:
lowering of hydraulic heads at pumping centers
reduces discharge to streams
induced movement of saltwater
land subsidence
Sinkholes
Form in areas with abundant water and soluble bedrock
Stalagmites
Underground cave
Dripstone and flowstone form from GW that degasses entering cave
Acidic water flows along fractures, enlarging them
Carbonate GW infiltrates cave, causing formation of flowstone
Water resources in Cincinnati
Miller water plant
Treatment: settling, sand & gravel infiltration, granular activated carbon filtration, pH adjustment, addition of chlorine
GAC (granular activated carbon) → best way to remove organic material from water
Bolton Plant on the Great Miami Aquifer
US Department of Energy’s Fernald Uranium Processing Plant
Hydrological Basins
GW systems are integrated at the scale of hydrological basins
Nested hierarchy → large river basins contain multiple smaller river basins (dendritic drainage system)
GW pollution
Plumes → GW pollutants that expand contamination volumes
Surface plume → on surface channels
Ultimate fate of GW contaminants is discharged into surface water
Soluble substances dissolve into groundwater
Insoluble subtances:
Lighter than water → float on top of GWT
Heavier than GWT → sink to base of aquifer
Remediation of Contaminated soils
Geomembrane → synthetic material that is used to contain leaching
Pump Recovery → contaminated GW pumped to surface for treatment
Surfactant Flushing → injecting surfactants (fuels) contaminated aquifers or soils to release contaminants into GW
Chemical Treatments → reactants pumped down to react with contaminants (oxidizers are common)
Oxidation Processes → UV light facilitates reaction that breaks down pollutants
Air stripping → fluids pumped to top of tower and contaminants flow down while air pumps up (separates them)
Bioreactors → degrade contaminants using microorganisms
Ion exchange → strips out contaminants by using resent
Constructed wetlans → capture heavy metals
Growth of vegetation
Monitored natural attenuation → just monitoring
Edwards Aquifer
bad water line
surface = low salinity
deeper = higher salinity
deeper than bad water line = too saline to consume
Air & Water pollution in US
Pitt & LA
Effects of sulfate
acid rain
destruction of ozone
Clean Air Act of 1970