Singer; Solution to world poverty

The argument from analogy

1. Envelope and Pond cases are morally analogous. There is no morally significant differences between the two cases.

2. SO, failing to donate is at least as morally wrong as failing to save the child.

3. Failing to save the child is morally very wrong.

4. SO, failing to donate is morally very wrong.

Strong version of the Singer Principle

If it is within our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought morally do it.

Moderate version of the Singer Principle

If it is within our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of moral importance, we ought morally to do it.

Singer’s basic Argument

1. Suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad.

2. If its in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought to do it.

3. By donating, without sacrificing anything nearly as important.

4. SO, many Americans ought to donate to aid agencies.

Proximity Objection

SP does not distinguish between the needs of people nearby and those far away.

We have a greater obligation to help people in our own communities than we have to those far away.

Uncertainty Objection

Giving money to aid groups does not guarantee that it will get to people who need it or effectively provide aid.

Practicality Objection

People will not give to the degree that either the moderate or strong versions of the Singer Principle demands.