1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Daoism / Taoism
Main distinction
Philosophical Daoism: daojia 道家.
Religious Daoism: daojiao 道教.
Exam takeaway
Do not automatically treat Laozi/Zhuangzi as organized religious Daoism.
Central concept: Dao 道
Point
Dao = Way.
Used in all schools, but interpreted differently.
Exam takeaway
Always specify which Dao: Confucian moral Way, Daoist cosmic Way, Legalist Way, etc.
Three texts Daoism
Important Daoist texts
Zhuangzi 莊子.
Laozi 老子 / Daodejing 道德經.
Liezi 列子.
Exam takeaway
Zhuangzi and Laozi are the core for this exam.
Zhuangzi
Key facts
ca. 369–286 BCE.
Zhuangzi 莊子 = Master Zhuang.
Original name: Zhuang Zhou 莊周.
Little known about life.
Probably from Song.
Book: Zhuangzi.
Exam takeaway
Zhuangzi is a Warring States thinker associated with Daoist thought, but his classification is later.
Zhuangzi’s relationship to Daoism
Main idea
Zhuangzi’s relationship to “Daoism” is historically complicated.
Key points
Han Daoism centered more on Laozi and Yellow Emperor: Huang-Lao school.
Zhuangzi was classified under Dao category.
His thought differs from Huang-Lao tho.
Later gradually connected to religious Daoism.
Common link: focus on Dao.
Exam takeaway
Daoism is a later umbrella; Zhuangzi was not simply part of one unified Daoist religion from the start.
Book Zhuangzi
Structure
33 chapters.
Inner chapters: first 7, possibly Zhuangzi’s own.
Outer chapters: 8–22, related to Zhuangzi school.
Miscellaneous/syncretic chapters: 23–33.
Current editions based on Guo Xiang’s edition around 300 CE.
Exam takeaway
Zhuangzi is layered and edited, not a simple single-author book.
Features of the book Zhuangzi
Features
Humorous!
Dialogues, anecdotes, parables, fables.
Excellent language.
Makes fun of logic.
Values uselessness.
Criticizes funeral rites.
Poetic.
Positive/relaxed about death.
Exam takeaway
Zhuangzi uses stories and paradox to challenge ordinary values and rigid thinking.
Important topics Zhuangzi
Key themes
Follow natural flow.
Become one with Dao.
Reject debate and rigid right/wrong. No this or that, no right or wrong
Relativism of language.
Truth beyond dualism.
Criticize profit/usefulness.
Alternative lifestyle outside state engagement.
Relaxed attitude to death.
Exam takeaway
Zhuangzi rejects rigid moral/political categories and promotes spontaneous alignment with Dao.
Criticism of reason and dualism
Main idea
Right/wrong distinctions are unstable.
Key points
Confucians and Mohists overvalue argument.
What is wrong for one may be right for another.
Truth cannot be settled by debate.
Direct insight avoids “this/that.”
Birth/death, acceptable/unacceptable, right/wrong arise together.
Wise person does not cling to dualistic categories.
Exam takeaway
Zhuangzi attacks dualism and rational debate as limited.
Relativism of statements
Main idea
Language cannot convey ultimate truth.
Key points
Truth is beyond duality.
A tree is only good from human perspective if it had fruit. if it doesnt have fruit it will survive so thats good for the tree.
Similar later resonance with Buddhism.
Exam takeaway
Zhuangzi treats language as useful but unable to capture Dao/truth fully.
About right and wrong
Main idea
Debate cannot prove absolute truth.
Key points
If you win a debate, does that make you absolutely right?
Judges are biased depending on standpoint.
No neutral judge solves the issue.
Therefore right/wrong are perspectival.
Exam takeaway
Zhuangzi undermines the idea that argument can establish absolute right and wrong.
Value of uselessness
Main idea
Uselessness can be useful.
Key points
Useful trees are cut down.
Fruit trees are damaged for fruit.
Useless tree survives peacefully.
Critique of Mohist usefulness/profit logic.
Exam takeaway
Zhuangzi reverses ordinary values: uselessness can protect life and freedom.
Ziran 自然 and free roaming
Main idea
Follow natural flow and avoid losing yourself.
Terms
自然 ziran = naturalness / spontaneity.
逍遙遊 xiaoyao you = free and easy wandering / roaming freely.
Key points
Choosing rigidly between this/that causes self-loss.
Perfect man’s mind is like a mirror.
He reflects things without clinging to them.
Exam takeaway
Zhuangzi’s ideal is spontaneous, non-attached responsiveness to the natural flow.
Laozi 老子
Key facts
Probably 3rd c. BCE, uncertain.
No reliable biography.
Text: Daodejing 道德經.
Means “Scripture of the Way and its Power/Virtue.”
Extremely translated.
Difficult and open to interpretation.
Exam takeaway
Laozi/Daodejing is central but ambiguous: cosmic, ethical, and political readings are possible.
Main ideas in Laozi
Key points
Naturalness.
Harmony with Dao.
Non-action wuwei 無為.
Freedom from desire.
Exam takeaway
Laozi promotes alignment with Dao through simplicity, non-action, and reduced desire.
Dao 道
Main idea
Dao cannot be fully defined.
Key points
Cannot be expressed in words.
Inherent in everything.
Produces everything, including Heaven and Earth.
Exam takeaway
In Laozi, Dao is the ineffable source of all reality.
Dao as ontological source
Main idea
Dao produces all things.
Formula
Dao → One.
One → Two.
Two → Three.
Three → all things.
Key point
All things emerge from Dao and are harmonized by qi/breath.
Exam takeaway
Laozi’s Dao is not just a moral path; it is the ontological source of the cosmos.
Political dimension
Main idea
Laozi may have a strong political dimension.
Key points
Possible Legalist influence.
Rule by non-doing, wuwei 無為.
Keep people simple/ignorant.
Easier to rule.
Exam takeaway
Laozi is not just mystical; it can also be read as political theory of minimal intervention and soft control.
Qi 氣
Main idea
Qi 氣 is life-energy / primordial energy.
Key points
Qi can mean energy, primordial power, breath, life force.
It helps achieve ziran 自然, naturalness/spontaneity.
Qi links body, cosmos, and cultivation.
Why it matters →
Qi becomes a bridge between:
Daoist self-cultivation;
Chinese cosmology;
medicine;
later religious Daoism;
correlative thinking.
Exam takeaway
Qi is the energetic substance/process that links human life with cosmic naturalness.
The sage / wise man
Main images
Sage compared to a small child.
Child is protected by innocence.
Child contains everything, but undeveloped.
Therefore: total harmony.
Other images
Emphasis on female principle, yin 陰.
Comparison with water:
flexible;
adaptable;
weak, but strongest.
Soft/weak wins over strong/hard.
Exam takeaway
The Daoist sage is childlike, soft, flexible, non-aggressive, and harmonized with Dao.
Critique of dualism
Point
Knowing beauty creates ugliness.
Knowing skill creates lack of skill.
Exam takeaway
Laozi criticizes dualistic thinking: opposites define each other.
Opposites generate each other
Pairs
existence / non-existence;
difficulty / ease;
long / short;
high / low;
musical notes / tones;
before / behind.
Exam takeaway
Laozi sees opposites as relational, not absolute.
Mingjia 名家, School of Names
Names
School of Names.
School of Designations.
Sophists / Dialecticians.
Focus
Relationship between:
shi 實 = object/reality;
ming 名 = name/designation.
Key points
Argumentation/disputation important.
Sometimes tendencies toward Legalism.
Hui Shi and Gongsun Long are examples.
No direct texts; known through other schools:
Zhuangzi;
Xunzi;
Hanfeizi;
Shiji.
Important for development of logic in China.
Exam takeaway
School of Names studies how names relate to reality and contributes to Chinese logic.
Hui Shi 惠施
Key facts
ca. 370–310 BCE.
Investigates relations between objects.
Observes related opposites.
Opposites contradict and depend on each other.
School of names 名家
Emphasizes equality of things.
Uses paradoxes.
Compared to Greek Sophists.
Exam takeaway
Hui Shi uses paradox to show that distinctions are unstable and things are relational.
Gongsun Long 公孫龍
Focus
Designation and relation to real objects.
Our common thinking connects things artificially.
Different senses cannot always create a unified concept.
White horse paradox
“A white horse is not a horse” 白馬非馬.
“Horse” = animal category.
“White” = color category.
“White horse” is not simply the concept “horse.”
Hard white stone
“A white hard stone are two different things.”
Eyes perceive white.
Touch perceives hardness.
One sense cannot perceive both.
Exam takeaway
Gongsun Long separates names, qualities, and objects to expose problems in ordinary categorization.