1/38
If there are 2 factors eg LDF, pd-pd then say no of electrons outweigh presence / strength of pd-pd interactions
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
ionic bonding
the electrostatic force of attraction between oppositely charged ions
lattice
the regular three-dimensional arrangement of atoms / ions in a crystal (lattice)
factors affecting strength of ionic bond
charge of ions
distance between ions / ionic radii
F ∝ Q1 x Q2 / d²
properties of ionic compounds
hard, rigid, brittle - layer snaps if it is shifted / displaced so that like charges come on top of one another
high melting and boiling points
soluble in water / polar solvents, insoluble in non-polar solvents - hydrating ions is exothermic
do not conduct electricity when solid; conducts electricity when molten or dissolved in solution
migration of ions
manganate ions attracted to positive anode (purple)
CrO4 2- chromate ions attracted to positive anode (yellow)
covalent bond
the electrostatic force of attraction between the two nuclei and the shared pair of electrons
electron density map
shared electron density = overlapping / joined lines
types of structure
giant or simple molecular
octet rule
tendency to form an outer shell of 8 electrons - associated with stability
sigma bond
single bond
the overlap of atomic orbitals between the axis between two nuclei (end-to-end overlap)
stronger than pi bonds - shared electrons held closer to nuclei + more direct overlap
pi bond
the overlap of singly occupied p orbitals above and below the axis between two nuclei / plane of nuclei (side to side overlap)
lone pair
a pair of electrons in the outer shell not used in bonding
dative covalent bond
a bond between 2 atoms where both of the electrons in the shared pair are donated by the same atom
expansion of the octet
from P onwards (period 3)
able to hold the extra electrons in the empty / easily accessibly d subshell / has available d orbitals
close in energy to p subshell
endothermic - compensated by making more bonds
bond length
distance between the nuclei of two bonded atoms in a molecule
factors affecting bond length
inversely proportional to bond strength
atomic radii / no of electron shells
nuclear charge
single / double bonds - larger no of electrons shared = stronger force of attraction
properties of simple molecular substances
low melting and boiling points
do not conduct heat or electricity
more soluble in non-polar solvents
electron-pair repulsion theory
electron pairs repel to be as far apart as possible to maximise separation to minimise repulsion (only for when no lone pairs)
If lone pairs say electron pairs arrange themselves to minimise repulsion
shapes of molecules and bond angles
2 bonding pairs: linear, 180
3 bonding pairs: trigonal planar, 120
4 bonding pairs: tetrahedral, 109.5
5 bonding pairs: trigonal bipyramidal, 120 / 90 (in triangle one normal line one hatch one wedge)
6 bonding pairs: octahedral, 90
3 bonding pairs, 1 lone pair: trigonal pyramidal, 107
2 bonding pairs, 2 lone pairs: v-shaped / bent, 104.5 (say bent instead / both)
4 bonding pairs, 1 lone pair: see-saw, 172, 102 (2 normal lines on the outside 1 hatch 1 wedge)
4 bonding pairs, 2 lone pairs: square planar, 90
5 bonding pairs, 1 lone pair: square pyramidal, 88
isoelectronic
having the same number and arrangement of electrons
why do lone pairs repel more than bonding pairs
lone pairs: fatter, shorter, more concentrated distribution of negative charge held closer to the nucleus
bonding pairs: thinner, longer electron distribution
exam answer about shapes of molecules
number of bonding pairs / regions / lone pairs
electron pairs repel to be as far apart as possible to maximise separation to minimise repulsion
lone pairs repel more strongly than bonding pairs, compressing the bond angles / bonding pairs repel each other equally
therefore the molecule adopts the shape / angle
** or if lone pairs, electron pairs repel and arrange themselves to minimise repulsion
electronegativity
the ability of an atom to attract the shared pair of bonding electrons in a covalent bond
Pauling scale - 0 to 4
most electronegative: fluorine (4.0), oxygen, nitrogen
factors affecting electronegativity
nuclear charge
atomic radius
shielding
increases across a period - increased nuclear charge, decreased atomic radius, similar shielding
decreases down a group - increased atomic radius, shielding, outweighs increased nuclear charge
difference in electronegativity
indicates type of bonding
small difference in electronegativity 0 - 0.4: covalent bonding
medium difference in electronegativity 0.4 - 1.7: polar covalent bonding
large difference in electronegativity >= 1.7: ionic bonding - electrons are completely transferred to the more electronegative atom
polar molecules
contain polar bonds
asymmetrical molecule (non-identical bonds / presence of lone pairs) - bond dipoles do not cancel out
London (dispersion) forces
fluctuations in electron density around the molecule leads to a temporary / instantaneous dipole
induce a dipole in a neighbouring molecule
weak force of attraction between dipoles
present in all molecules
factors affecting LDFs
number of electrons in the molecule - larger no. / electron cloud = more polarisable as a greater chance of asymmetry in electron cloud / more easily distorted
shape of molecule - long, straight molecules have a larger surface area of contact between molecules
permanent dipole - permanent dipole interactions
attraction between terminal dipoles are in addition to london forces
electropositive pole of a molecule is attracted to the electronegative pole of another molecule
hydrogen bonding
H is covalently bonded to an oxygen, fluorine or nitrogen atom - electronegative enough to polarise H so it is very electron deficient
O, F, N must have an available lone pair of electrons
180 degrees around the central H atom
The bond is polar, X is more electronegative than H, force of attraction from electropositive H to lone pair of electrons on electronegative X, say specifically which bond is involved / the molecule has
low density of ice
each water molecule forms 4 hydrogen bonds with adjacent molecules
hydrogen bond lengths are relatively long (and longer than covalent bonds)
molecules are arranged in an open / hexagonal lattice structure
held further apart than in water / in water molecules get closer
boiling points of hydrides
H2O > HF > NH3
H-F is the most polar bond - stronger hydrogen bonds
H2O able to form 2 hydrogen bonds per molecule vs 1 hydrogen bond per molecule of HF / NH3
large decrease down the group then increase
no H bonds - weaker intermolecular forces
number of electrons increase down the group
solubility
‘Like dissolves like’ - solute will only dissolve if:
energy required to break the intermolecular forces within the solute and solvent < energy released when intermolecular forces are made between molecules of solute and solvent
non-polar substances disrupt the H bonding in water + reforms weak intermolecular forces
hydration of ions
exothermic
energy released from hydrating ions > energy required to break ionic bonds + intermolecular forces in water
miscible
two liquids that mix with each other
allotropes
different structural forms of the same element in the same physical state
fullerenes
C60 - molecular
each C forms 3 bonds with adjacent C atoms
cannot conduct electricity as delocalised electrons from C atoms are unable to move between molecules
properties of metals
dense - regularly arranged in a metallic lattice structure
high melting and boiling points
malleable and ductile - layers can slide over each other / slip without breaking metallic bonds
good conductors of heat and electricity
factors affecting boiling points of metals
charge on ions - higher charge = stronger force of attraction + more delocalised electrons holding the structure together
ionic radius / shielding
nuclear charge