Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Enforcement of Fugitive Slave Law
Law's purpose was to help owners track down runaway enslaved ppl who escaped to Northern state, capture them, & return them to their Southern owners
Law removed fugitive slave cases from state courts & made them exclusive to jurisdiction of fed gov't
Also authorized special US commissioners to use warrants to arrest fugitives
A captured person who claimed to be free & not someone who had just escaped slavery was denied right of trial by jury
State & local law enforcement officials were required to help enforce fed law
Opposition to Fugitive Slave Law
Passage of this law in Comp of 1850 persuaded many Southerners to accept that Cali would be free state
Hwvr, many Northerners bitterly resent law
RESULT: drove wedge btwn North & South
Anyone who attempted to hide runaway/obstruct enforcement of law was subject to heavy penalties
Hwvr, black & white activists in North bitterly resisted law
Thru court cases, protests, & sometimes force, tried to protect Afr Amers from being returned- or taken for the first time- into slavery
Underground Railroad
Loose network of activists who help enslaved ppl escape to freedom in North/Canada
Most "conductors" & those operating the "stations" were free Afr Amers & ppl who had escaped slavery themselves w/ the assistance of white abolitionists
Most famous conductor = Harriet Tubman
Free black citizens in North & abolitionists also organized vigilance committees to protect fugitive slaves from slave catchers
During Civil War, Afr Amer leaders like Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, & Sojourner Truth worked for emancipation & supported Black soldiers
Uncle Tom’s Cabin
Most influential book of its day
Abt conflict btwn an enslaved man, Tom, with brutal white slave owner, Simon Legere
By Northern writer Harriet Beecher Stowe
Moved a generation of Northerners and many Euros to regard all slave owners as cruel & inhuman
Southerners condemns the "untruths" in novel & looked upon it as one more proof of North's incurable prejudice against Southern way of life
Later, when Prez Lincoln met Stowe, he said "so you're the little woman who wrote the book that made this great war"
In response to Stowe's book, Mary Eastman wrote pro-slavery novel Aunt Phillis's Cabin
Portrayed world of kind slaveowners & happily enslaved ppl
Impending Crisis of the South
By Hinton R. Helper
Nonfiction
Attacked slavery from another angle
Used statistics to demonstrate to fellow Southerners that slavery weakened the South's economy
Southern states quickly banned book but it was widely distributed in North by antislavery Free-Soil leaders
Southern Reaction to Abolitionist Literature
Responding to Northern literature that condemned slavery, proslavery Southern whites counterattacked, arguing that slavery was good for both master and slave
Pointed out that slavery sanctioned the Bible and grounded in philosophy and history
Slavery also permitted by US Constitution
Southern Authorities contrasted conditions of Northern wage workers- "wage slaves" forced to work long hours in factories & mines- w/ familial bonds developed on plantations btwn slaves and masters
George Fitzhugh, best-known proslavery author, questioned principle of equal rights for "unequal men" and attacked wage system as worse than slavery
Wrote Sociology for the South & Cannibals All!
Effect of Law & Literature
Fugitive Slave Law & books on slavery increasingly polarized nation
Many Northerners who opposed expansion of slavery only for economic reasons and had scorned abolition became more concerned abt slavery as a moral issue
At same time, growing num of Southerners, particularly wealthy ones, became more convinced that Northerners would abolish slavery and way of life based upon it as soon as they could
3 Major Issues That Divided North & South
Attitudes abt morality of slavery
Views abt constitutional rights of states, particularly right to protect slavery
Differences over economic policies btwn free-labor industrial North and slave-labor agricultural South
The Election of 1852
Signs of trouble for Whig party appeared in 1852 election for prez
Whigs nominated another military hero of Mex War, General Winfield Scott
Attempting to ignore slavery issue, Whigs concentrated on party's traditional platform
Improving roads and harbors
But Scott quickly discovered that sectional issues couldn't be held in check
Antislavery and Southern factions of party fell to quarreling and party was on verge of splitting apart
Dems nominated compromise candidate, Franklin Pierce of NH, who they hoped would be safer choice, one acceptable to ppl in all regions
A Northerner, Pierce was acceptable to Southern Dems bc supported Fugitive Slave Law
In electoral College, Dems won all but 4 states, suggesting days of Whig Party were numbered
The Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854)
Dems, firmly in control of both White House & Cong, found they could avoid issue of slavery in territories
Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois proposed building transcontinental railroad thru center of country, w/ major terminus In Chicago, to promote Western settlement (& inc value of his own real estate in Chicago)
Southerners preferred more southerly route
To win Southerner support, Douglas introduced bill to divide Nebraska Territory into 2 parts- The Kansas and Nebraska territories, & allow settlers in each territory to decide whether to allow slavery
Impact of The Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854)
Since these territories were located north of the 36deg3' line, Douglas's bill gave Southerner an opportunity to expand slavery into lands that had been closed to it by the Missouri Comp of 1820
Many Northern Dems condemned bill as a surrender to "slave pwr"
Still, after 3 months of bitter debate, both houses of Cong passed Douglas's bill as Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, and Prez Pierce signed it into law
After 1854, conflicts btwn antislavery and proslavery forces exploded, both in Kansas and on floor of US Senate
Context of “Bleeding Kansas”
Stephen Douglas, Kansas-Nebraska Act sponsor, expected slavery issue in territory to be settled peacefully by antislavery farmers from Midwest who migrated to Kansas and constituted majority
Slavery holders from neighboring Missouri also set up homesteads in Kansas as means of winning control for South
Northern abolitionists and Free-Soilers responded by organizing the New England Emigrant Aid Company (1855), which paid for transportation of antislavery settlers to Kansas
Fighting broke out btwn proslavery and antislavery grps, & territory became known as "bleeding Kansas"
Midst of “Bleeding Kansas”
Proslavery Missourians, called "border ruffians" by their enemies, crossed border to create proslavery legislature in Lecompton, Kansas
Antislavery settlers refused to recognize this gov't and created their own legislature in Topeka
1856-> proslavery forces attacked free-soil town of Lawrence, killing abt 2 and destroying homes and businesses
Two days later-> John Brown, stern abolitionists, retaliated
Attacked proslavery farm settlement at Pottawatomie Creek, killing 5
Reaction to “Bleeding Kansas”
In Washington, Pierce admin did nothing to keep order in Kansas territory and failed to support honest elections there
As Kansas became bloodier, Dem Party became more divided btwn its Northern & Southern factions
Plan to let territories decide on slavery for themselves had resulted in chaos & bloodshed
Caning of Senator Sumner
Caning of Senator Sumner
Violence in Kansas spilled over into halls of US Cong
1856-> MA senator Charles Sumner attacked Dem admin in vitriolic speech, "The Crime Against Kansas"
His remarks included personal charges against SC senator Andrew Butler
Butler's nephew, Congressman Preston Brooks, defend uncle's honor by walking into Senate chamber and beating Sumner over the head repeated with a cane
Sumner never fully recovered from the attack
Action by Brooks outraged North, and the House voted to censure him while Southerners applauded deed
Sumner-Brooks incident was another sign of growing passions on both sides
Founding of Republican Party
Inc tensions over slavery divided Northern & Southern Dems & broke apart Whig party
Ex-Whigs scattered
Those frightened abt immigration joined Know-Nothing Party
With support of new members, Know-Nothings won a few local and state elections in the mid-1850s
Hwvr, as expansion of slavery became paramount political issue, signif of immigration decline, and along with it, the Know-Nothing Party
Ex-Whigs who supported expansion of slavery usually joined Dem Party
South became core of party, although Dems were still strong in North
Former Whigs who opposed Slavery expansion formed core of new party
The Republican Party was founded in Wisconsin in 1854 as reaction to passage of Kansas-Neb Act
About Republican Party
Composed of Free-Soilers and antislavery Whigs & Dems, its purpose was to oppose spread of slavery in territories-not to end slavery itself
Its first platform called for repeal of both Kansa-Neb Act and Fugitive Slave Law
As violence inc in Kansas, more ppl, inc some abolitionists, joined Repub Party, and it became second largest party in Country
But it was strictly Northern , or sectional, party
Its success threaten & alienated the South
The Election of 1856
Repubs' first test of strength came in presidential election of 1856
Their nominee was CA senator, the explorer and "Pathfinder," John C Fremont
Republican platform called for no expansion of slavery, free homesteads, & probusiness protective tariff
The Know-Nothings also competed strongly in this election, w/ their candidate, former Prez Milliard Fillmore, winning 20% of popular vote
As the one major national party, Dems expected to win
Nominated James Buchanan of PA, rejecting Prez Pierce and Stephen Douglas bc they were too closely identified w/ controversial Kansas-Neb Act
Result of Election of 1856
As expected, Dems won majority of popular and electoral vote
Repubs made strong showing for sectional party
Fermont carried 11 of the 16 free states
Some predicted that the antislavery Repubs could win the White House without a single vote from the South
Election of 1856 foreshadowed emergence of pwrful political party that would win all but 4 presidents btwn 1860 & 1932
Lecompton Constitution
One of Buchanan's 1st challenges as prez in 1857 was to decide whether to accept or reject proslavery state constitution for Kansas submitted by Southern legislature at Lecompton
Buchanan knew that Lecompton Constitution, as it was called, didn't have majority support
Even so, he asked Cong to accept document and admit Kansas as slave state
Cong didn't do so b/c many Dems, inc Stephen Douglas, joined w/ Repubs in rejecting constitution
The next yr, 1858, the proslavery document was overwhelmingly rejected by Kansas settlers, most of whom were antislavery Repubs
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Congressional folly & presidential ineptitude contributed to sectional crisis of 1850s
Supreme Court worsened crisis when it infuriated many Northerners w/ controversial proslavery decision in case of the enslaved man named Dred Scott
Scott had been held in slavery in Missouri and then taken to free territory of Wisconsin where he lived for 2 yrs before returning to Missouri
Arguing that his residence on free soil made him free citizen, Scott sued for his freedom in Missouri in 1846
Case worked its way thru court system
Finally reached Supreme Court which rendered its decision in March 1857, only 2 days after Buchanan was sworn in as prez
Presiding over court was Chief Justice Roger Taney, a Southern Dem
Result of Scott v. Sanford & Why
Majority of Court decided against Scott and gave these reasons:
Dred Scott had no right to sue in fed court b/c Framers of the Constitution didn't intend Afr Amers to be US citizens
Cong didn't have pwr to deprive any person of property w/o due process of law. If slaves were form of property, then Cong couldn't exclude slavery from any fed territory
Missouri Comp was unconstitutional b/c it excluded slavery from Wisconsin and other Northern territories
Impact of Dred Scott v. Sanford
Court's ruling delighted Southern Dems and infuriated Northern Repubs
In effect, Court declared all parts of Western territories open to slavery
Repubs denounced as "greatest cry in the annuals of the republic"
Timing of decision, after Buchanan's inauguration, led Northerners to suspect Dem prez and majority on Supreme Court, including Taney, had planned the decision so that it would settle slavery question
Inc Northern suspicions of conspiracy and induced thousands of Dems to vote Repub
Northern Dems like Senator Douglas were left w/ impossible task of supporting popular sovereignty w/o rejecting Dred Scott decision
Douglas's hopes for compromise and presidency were in jeopardy
Context of Douglas-Lincoln Debates
1858: focus of nation was on Douglas's campaign for reelection as senator from Illinois
Challenging him was successful trial lawyer & former member of Illinois legislature, Abraham Lincoln, as Repub candidate
Lincoln served 1 term in Cong in 1840s as Whig
Nationally, unknown compared to Douglas (the Little Giant)
Champion of pop sovereignty & possible best hope for holding nation 2gether if elected prez in 1860
Lincoln was not abolitionists - moderate who was against expansion of slavery
Spoke effectively of slavery as moral issue
"If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong"
Douglas-Lincoln Debates
In debate in Freeport, Illinois, Lincoln challenged Douglas to reconcile pop sovereignty w/ Dred Scott decision
In what became known as Freeport Doctrine, Douglas responded that slavery couldn't exist in community if local citizens didn't pass laws (slave codes) maintaining it
His views angered Southern Dems b/c from their POV Douglas didn't go far enough in supporting implication of Dred Scott decision
Douglas won campaign for reelection to US senate
In long run, hwvr, lost ground in his own party by alienating Southern Dems
Lincoln, on the other hand, emerged from debates as national figure and leading contender for Repub nomination for prez 1860
Context of Election of 1860
In Northern states outside Illinois where Douglas & Dems defeated Lincoln, the Repubs did well in congressional elections of 1858
Greatly alarmed may Southerners
Worried not only abt antislavery plank in Repub's program but also abt that party's economic program, which favored Northern industrialists at expense of South
Higher tariffs pledged by Repubs would help Northern businesses but hurt South, which depended on exporting cotton
Events leading up to Lincoln's election & secession of 11 Southern states from the Union set up stage for war
On the Road to Secession
Southern fears grew that a Repub victory in 1860 would spell disaster for their economy & threaten their "constitutional right," as affirmed by Supreme Court, to own enslaved ppl as property
Adding to their fears were Northern radicals supporting John Brown, the man who had massacred 5 farmers in Kansas in 1856
John Brown's Raid at Harpers Ferry
election of 1860
John Brown’s Raid at Harper’s Ferry
John Brown confirmed South's worst fears of radical abolitionism when he tried to start uprising of enslaved ppl in VA
Oct 1859: led small band of followers, including his 4 sons and some formerly enslaved ppl, to attack federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry
His impractical plan was to use guns from arsenal to arm VA's enslaved Afr Amers, whom he expected to rise up in revolt
Fed troops under command of Robert E. Lee captured Brown and his band after 2-day siege
Brown & 6 of his followers were tired for treason by state of VA
At trial, Brown spoke w/ simple eloquence of his humanitarian motives in wanting to free enslaved ppl
Hwvr, he was convicted & hanged
Impact of John Brown’s Raid at Harper’s Ferry
Brown's raid divided Northerners
Moderates condemned his use of violence, while abolitionists hailed him as martyr
Southern whites saw raid and Northern support for it as finally proof of North's true intentions- to use slave revolts to destroy the South
After John Brown's raid, more and more Amers feared that their country was moving to disintegration
Presidential election of 1860 would test Union
Breakup of Democratic Party
As 1860 began, Dem Party represented last hope for compromise
Dems held their national convention in Charleston, SC
Steph Douglas was party's leading candidate & most capable of winning presidency
Blocking his nomination were angry Southerners and supporters of Prez Buchanan
After deadlocking at Charleston, Dems held 2nd convention in Baltimore
Many delegates from slave states walked out, enabling remaining delegates to nominate Douglas on platform of pop sovereignty and enforcement of Fugitive Slave Law
Southern Dems then held their own convention in Baltimore and nominated VP John C. Breckinridge f KY as candidate
Southern Dem platform called for unrestricted extension of slavery in territories in annexation of Cuba, a Spanish colony that still practiced slavery
Republican Nomination of Lincoln
When Repubs met in Chicago, they enjoyed hopes of easy win over divided Dems
They drafted platform that appealed to economic self-interest of Northerns and Westerners
Called for exclusion of slavery from territories, protective tariff for industry, free land for homesteaders, and internal improvements to encourage Western settlement, including railroad to Pacific
To win moderates of slavery, they rejected well-known NY Senator William Seward, a strong opponent of slavery
They turned to little-known Illinois lawyer of Abraham Lincoln, a strong debater
They believed that Lincoln could carry Midwestern states of Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio
One cloud darkened the Repub's otherwise bright future
In South, radicals warned that if the country elected Lincoln, their states would leave the Union
Constitutional Union Party
Fearing Repub victory, group of former Whigs, Know-Nothings, & moderate Dems formed new party: Constitutional Union Party
For prez, they nominated John Bell of TN & pledged enforcement of laws and Constitution and, above all, preservation of Union
Results of Election of 1860
While Douglas campaigned across country, Lincoln remained at home in Springfield, Illinois, meeting Repub leaders and giving statements to press
Election results were predictable
Lincoln carried every free state of the North, which represented solid majority of 59% of electoral votes
Breckinridge, Southern Dem, carried Deep South, leaving Douglas and Bell w/ just a few electoral votes in border states
Hwvr, Lincoln won only 39.8% of popular vote, so he would be minority president
New political reality was that populous free states has enough electoral votes to elect a prez w/o any electoral votes from South
Southern fears that North would dominate fed gov't- and could soon threaten democracy- appeared to be coming true
Secession of Deep South
In 1860, Repubs controlled neither Senate nor Supreme Court
Even so, election of Lincoln was all that Southern secessionists needed to call for immediate disunion
In Dec 1860: special convention in SC voted unanimously to secede, saying that they needed to protect slavery
Within 6 weeks, state conventions in GA, FL, AL, MS, LA, & TX did the same
In several states, particularly GA and AL, many ppl were uncertain abt or opposed secession
Hwvr large slaveowners, arguing that states had right to defend slavery, prevailed
In Feb 1861: representatives of 7 states of Deep South met Montgomery, AL, and created Confederate States of Amer
Constitution of this Southern country was like US constitution, except that Confederacy placed limits on govt's pwr to impose tariffs and restrict slavery
Elected pre & VP were Jefferson Davis of MS & Alexander Stephens of GA
Crittenden Compromise
Critten Compromise
Lame-duck prez (leader completing term after someone else has been elected into office), Buchanan had 5 months in office b4 Lincoln succeeded him
Buchanan was conservative who did nothing to prevent secession
Cong was more active
In last-ditch effort to appease South, Senator John Crittenden of KY proposed constitutional amendment that would guarantee right to hold slaves in all territories south of old Missouri Comp line, 36deg30'
Southern Whites who voted for secession believed they were acting in tradition of Revolution of 1776
Argued that they had right to national independent & to dissolve constitutional compact that no longer protected them from "tyranny" of Northern rule
Many also thought that Lincoln, like Buchanan, might permit secession w/o fight
Those how thought this had badly miscalculated
A Nation Divided After Election of 1860
When Lincoln took office as prez in March 1861, ppl wondered if he would challenge secession militarily
In his inaugural address, Lincoln assured Southerners that he would not interfere w/ slavery where it existed
At same time, he warned, no state had the right to break up Union
He appealed for restraint: "In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The gov't will not assail you. You can have no conflict w/o being yourselves the aggressors"
Fort Sumter
Secession of Upper South
Keeping the Border States in Union
Fort Sumter
Despite prez's message of conciliation, danger of war was acute
Critical was status of fed forts in states that had secede
Fort Sumter, in harbor of Charleston, SC, was cut off by Southern control of harbor
Rather than either giving up Fort Sumter or attempting to defend it, Lincoln announced that he was sending provisions of food to small federal garrison
He thus gave SC choice of either permitting fort to hold out or opening fire
Carolina's guns thundered and thus, on April 12 1861, the war began
Attack on Fort and its capture after 2 days of pounding united most Northerners behind patriotic fight to save Union
Secession of Upper South
B4 SC attacked Fort S, only 7 states of Deep South had seceded
After it was clear that Lincoln would use troops to defend Union, 4 states of Upper South- VA, NC, TN, & AR- seceded and joined Confederacy
As in earlier states, decision to secede was controversial
Confed's then moved their capital to Richmond, VA
Ppl of western VA remained loyal to Union, becoming separate state in 1863
Keeping the Border States in Union
4 other slaveholders remained in Union
Decisions of DE, MD, Missouri, & KY not to join the Confederacy were partly result of pro-Union sentiment in those states and partly the results of shrewd federal policies
In MD, pro-secessionists attacked Union troops & threatened railroad to WA
Union army resorted to martial law to keep state under fed control
In Missouri, US troops prevented pro-South elements from gaining control although guerrilla forces for Confederacy were active during war
In KY, state legislature voted to remain neutral
Lincoln initially respected its neutrality & waited for South to isolate it before moving in fed troops
Keeping border states in Union was military & political goal for Lincoln
Their loss would inc Confed population by 50% and weaken North's strategic position
Partly to avoid alienating Unionists in border states, Lincoln rejected initial calls for emancipation of slaves