primary deviation
Social penalties
penalties & rejection
Hostilities & resentment
action by society
stigmatizing & penalties
acceptance
no act is intrinsically criminal
Criminal definitions are enforced in the interest or the powerful
A person dose not become a criminal by violating the law
The practice of dichotomizing individuals into criminal & noncriminal groups is contrary to common sense & research
Only a few persons are caught in violating the law, even though many individuals may be equally guilty
Once a criminal, always a criminal, but some are more than others
Criminal sanctions also vary according to other characteristics of the offender
Free-will perspective allows for the condemnation & rejection of the identifies offender
Difficult for the offender to maintain a favorable image of himself
vaueness & ambiguity
evaluating the labeling theory
Labeling theory focuses criminal & deviant behavior
Labeling theory focuses on the “reactors” rather than the “actors”
focus on the individual
group & intergroup relations
may explain criminal behavior
political protest
labor disputes
between & within competing unions
racial & ethnic clashes
Definition of crime
Formulation of criminal definitions
Application of criminal definitions
Development of behavior patterns in relation to criminal definitions
Constriction of criminal conceptions
The social realty of crime
law is a tool of the ruling class
they argue that all crime is a product of a class struggle
scholars need to address the relationships between the mode of production & understanding crime
Accumulation of society
Procreation of labor & process of production
Approved patterns of distribution & consumption of society
Socialization of population inter production role
Groups that threaten capitalist ideology
Surplus Labor Population
Extensiveness & intensity of state control
Size level of threat from problem population
Level of organization of problem population
Effectiveness of social control structure to central population
Alternative types of processing
Parallel control structure (organized crime, crimes, tribes)
Utitility of problem Population
sanction based on accountability measures
offender rehabilitation & reintegration
enhanced community safety & security
the etiological crisis due to rising crime rates
The crisis in penalty in terms of the failure of prisoners, as well as a reappraisal of the role of police
The increased awareness of victimization & of crimes that had gone unnoticed
A growing public demand & criticism of public service efficiency & accountability
Definition : attempts to provide an analysis of crime on all levels & develop a range of policy recommendations
Attachment
Commitment
Involvement
Belief
affection that characterizes a relationship between people
Extent individual cares about opinions of conventional others
effective monitor child's behavior
recognize deviant behavior
punish deviant behavior appropriately
lambic and paralimbic systems
fully developed during adolescence
increased sensation seeking
frontal lobe
not fully developed until early adulthood
less impulse control
Establish rules that stop people from being selfish
Crime allows people to unite
delinquency was a consequence of weak controls = weak ego / superego amongst juveniles
no explicit motivation for delinquent activity
delinquency occurs in absence of controls
Internal control
direct control
indirect control
individuals can be pushed into deliquency by their social environment (lack of employment / education)
pulled into criminal activity (friends)
control is subjected
exercise determine possible deviance
a person is least likely to offend when he/she has a balance of controlling & being controlled by others
(explains lower level crimes)
Crime and delinquency rates are factors of class position and family function ( patriarchal / maternal influences)
scanning the environment
seeking out peer groups that align with who you are = mapping genetic similarities
21% of all interactions are influenced by genes
41% of all delinquent peer interactions are influenced by genes