RM&C - t4 marketing inequalities

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/5

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

6 Terms

1
New cards

ethics & responsibility in MC & advertising

responsibility issues MC: portrays ideal (unattainable, changing), gap between ideal/real, consequences: low self esteem/reduced wellbeing/division: in-group/out-group; m source of change: power to shift cultural norms instead of reproducing, ads = potential to disrupt/challenge/address stereotypes & consequences; e.g. Fenty Beauty 2019: 50 foundation shades, previously excluded skin tones, valued $3b in 15months; Dove Real Beauty Campaign: female empowerment, Neo-liberal feminism - individual effort, ignore structural inequalities; -washing: rainbowwashing/femwashing/wokewashing - symbolic gestures/no evidence of addressing structural inequalities, for publicity enhancing image, campaigns benefit organisations but don’t change the world (Jones 2019)

2
New cards

MC as mechanism that reproduces inequalities

MC reinforces existing power dynamics through underrepresentation/misrepresentation/stereotyping; relationship: race & marketing (Foster Davis 2020) - markets rooted in racially driven colonial & imperialist practices, dominant groups set norms/rules/have privilege/control resources + opportunities, marketing produces demeaning/stereotyped images, damaging reputation of group; stereotypes: gender/race/socio-economic, shapes ‘normal’; targeting specific groups: tobacco/alcohol/fast-food targets black/hispanic/Native American = contributes to health disparities

3
New cards

under representation & misrepresentation in advertising

underrepresentation: invisibility/infrequent representation of historically marginalised groups; misrepresentation: stereotyping/inferior representation; gender rep: m = confident/in charge / w = vulnerable/submissive (Goffman 1979), slow rate of change, ASA ruling: marketing can’t have harmful gender stereotypes, outdated views impede equality; race & marketing imagery: black women stereotypes (Aunt Jemima renamed after BLM), black = background/token minority/athletes/dancers/unhealthy product ads, ‘white gaze’ (Davis, 2018); Native American: nature lovers/alcoholics/savages, stereotyping so common = subliminal/unnoticed; intersectionality (Crenshaw 1989): multiple marginalised identities = multidimensional lived experiences, e.g. age/gender, race/gender, religion/gender; intersectional underrepresentation (Nolke 2018): mainstream ad: LGBTQI+ representation increases but 230/240 intersections of s/class/age/race remain invisible, intersectional invisibility for identities overlapping multiple marginalised groups

4
New cards

cultural appropriation & how it leads to inequalities

cultural appropriation: use of elements of one culture without acknowledgement/inappropriate/offensive, harm: erodes identity/misrepresents/fetishises/commodifies traditions, e.g. Ralph Lauren: copied Mexican indigenous designs = colonialism in practice; self-authorisation strategies (Lüthje, 2024): reforming - consumers problematise harms & advocate for fairness, restraining - limit engagement to less controversial aspects, recontextualising - situate appreciation in socio-historical context, rationalising - dismiss cultural appropriation concerns; consumers sensitised to neocolonial market dynamics = reforming, public perception = restraining, reflective consumers = recontextualising, cosmopolitan consumers = rationalising

5
New cards

colonisation in MC

colonial imagery in charity work (Whitehead, 2023): subjects = helpless / viewer = white saviour, remove white gaze & show holistic representations, ethical reflection: who takes image/context/connection; culturally sensitive tourism (Sámi, Finland): indigenous, modernisation & forced assimilation weakened identity, tourism expected stereotypes but Sámi reluctant = impersonations/distorted images, conflicts over land use, ethics practice: reciprocity/respect host agency/avoid white gaze; colonial roots in marketing: m reinforces white superiority in organisational cultures, practices overt/covert/unintended but systematically embedded (Foster Davis, 2020); solutions: examine m theory & practice, include marginalised voices, ensure empowered/intersectional visibility, reduce harmful stereotypes, accept multiple ways of knowing & doing marketing

6
New cards

marketing inequalities

ethical & responsibility in MC & advertising; under representation & misrepresentation in advertising; cultural appropriation & how it leads to inequalities; colonisation in MC