unit 1 law - negligence

studied byStudied by 2 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 15

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

16 Terms

1

negligence definition

a tort (civil wrong) which allows someone to claim for compensation if they have been injured or if their property has been damaged by someone else who has a duty to take care of them

New cards
2

what are the three elements of negligence?

  1. A duty of care must be owed by the defendant to the claimant

  2. The duty must be breached (broken) by the defendant

  3. The broken duty must have caused the damage or injury

New cards
3

Which case sets out the three elements of negligence?

Donoghue V Stevenson

New cards
4

What is the case that sets out Duty of Care?

Robinson v CC West Yorkshire Police

New cards
5

What is the rule for the Robinson case?

If ther is an existing similar case or Act of Parliament, that case must be followed but if there is not an existing case or Act of Parliament, then the test in Caparo v Dickman must be followed

New cards
6

What are the duty of care relationships?

  1. employer - employee

  2. doctor - patient

  3. driver - pedestrian, passenger, or other road users

  4. rescue service - patient

New cards
7

reasonable man definition

someone who is sensible when doing something which carries a risk of some kind

New cards
8

what is the case for the reasonable man test?

Wells v Cooper

New cards
9

what are the four risk factors?

  1. special characteristics

  2. risk of harm

  3. social usefulness

  4. taking precautions

New cards
10

which are the three different tests for other categories of people?

  1. professionals

  2. learners

  3. children

New cards
11

what are the two types of causation?

  1. factual causation

  2. legal causation

New cards
12

what test does factual causation use?

it uses the “but for” test

New cards
13

what is the “but for” test?

“but for the defendant’s act or omission, would the injury or loss have occurred?”

New cards
14

what is an interviening act?

something that can happen that will break the link between the defendant’s act and the claimant’s injury. this can break the chain of causation.

New cards
15

what is legal causation?

it shows that the harm or injury caused was reasonably forseeable

New cards
16

what is the Thin Skull Rule?

it allows the court to take into account any sensitivity the claimant may have

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 13 people
853 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 22 people
647 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 13 people
1015 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 13 people
864 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 16 people
229 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 121 people
658 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 18800 people
688 days ago
4.7(98)
note Note
studied byStudied by 22 people
387 days ago
5.0(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (48)
studied byStudied by 71 people
440 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (83)
studied byStudied by 13 people
831 days ago
4.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (141)
studied byStudied by 181 people
9 days ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (51)
studied byStudied by 19 people
491 days ago
4.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (57)
studied byStudied by 169 people
445 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (55)
studied byStudied by 22 people
315 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (32)
studied byStudied by 11 people
833 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (34)
studied byStudied by 4 people
112 days ago
5.0(1)
robot