1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Who began legal action, and who did they sue?
The plaintiff (Frank Rocarelli) sued the defendant (Honourable Maurice Duplessis, Premier of Quebec)
What led to legal action?
Plaintiff was a Jehovah's Witness, restaurant owner for 30+ years.
Was bailing out other Jehovah's Witnesses for propaganda
Chief Crown Prosecutor (Gagnon) contacts Chairman of the Liquor Commission (Archambault) who calls Duplessis, who tells commissioner to cancel plaintiff's liquor license.
Restaurant closes 6 months after cancellation
Plaintiff begins action June 3, 1947, claiming damages of $118,741
What court did action start in?
Superior Court of Quebec - Court of Queen's Bench
True or False: Mr. Duplessis was found guilty in the first trial
False, Duplessis was found LIABLE
Who appealed the decision in the Superior Court of Quebec?
Maurice Duplessis
What was the outcome of the first appeal
Appeal was dismissed
Name the 2 roles of each party in the Supreme Court case
Roncarelli = Appellant
Duplessis = Respondent