Educational Assessment and Evaluation (Course Code 8602)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/149

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive set of 150 vocabulary flashcards covering key measurement, assessment, evaluation, testing, validity, reliability, and score interpretation terms from Course Code 8602.

Last updated 5:13 AM on 9/4/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

150 Terms

1
New cards

Educational Measurement

The process of obtaining a quantitative, numerical description of a student's progress towards a predetermined goal, answering how much a learner has learned.

2
New cards

Educational Testing

An instrument or systematic procedure used to measure a particular characteristic, knowledge level, or skill of a learner.

3
New cards

Educational Assessment

The comprehensive ongoing process of gathering, recording, interpreting, using, and communicating information about a child's progress and achievement in knowledge, concepts, skills, and attitudes.

4
New cards

Educational Evaluation

A continuous inspection of all available quantitative and qualitative information to form a valid value judgment regarding the worthiness, goodness, or desirability of student learning and educational programs.

5
New cards

Assidere

The Latin word meaning 'to sit beside', from which the term 'assessment' is derived, emphasizing a non-threatening partnership based on mutual trust.

6
New cards

Framework for Classroom Assessment (Hamidi 2010)

A conceptual framework addressing Why, What, Who, How, When, and How much to assess to clarify the true nature of classroom assessment.

7
New cards

Assessment for Learning (Formative Assessment)

A continuous, ongoing assessment process that monitors day-to-day student progress and provides timely, specific descriptive feedback to modify teaching and support high-quality learning.

8
New cards

Assessment of Learning (Summative Assessment)

Assessment conducted generally at the end of a course or unit to evaluate overall student achievement, assign grades, and provide formal performance reports to stakeholders.

9
New cards

Assessment as Learning

The use of assessment to foster students' metacognitive skills, self-evaluation, and critical reflection, enabling them to adjust their goals and become autonomous lifelong learners.

10
New cards

Descriptive Feedback

Specific informational feedback that helps students understand what they are doing well and provides actionable guidance on how to reach the next step in their learning process.

11
New cards

Diagnostic Assessment Principle

The principle that assessment should reveal learners' specific strengths, weaknesses, and learning difficulties during in-progress instruction.

12
New cards

Interactive Principle of Assessment

The principle viewing assessment as a dynamic, two-way interactive process engaging both teacher and student in monitoring performance.

13
New cards

Student-Centered Assessment Principle

An assessment approach where learners actively participate in setting criteria, establishing goals, and self-evaluating, thereby reducing learning anxiety.

14
New cards

Non-Judgmental Assessment Principle

The practice of focusing classroom assessment strictly on learning without praise, blame, or determining pass/fail stances.

15
New cards

Mutual Understanding in Assessment

A shared feeling of reality established when teachers and students interact based on common assessment objectives.

16
New cards

Learner's Autonomy in Assessment

A principle where students transition from teacher assessment to self-assessment, assuming maximum responsibility for what and how they learn.

17
New cards

Reflective Teaching

An instructional approach where teachers develop and refine their understanding of teaching quality through critical reflection on data collected from formative and summative assessments.

18
New cards
<p>Assessment Framework (For, Of, As Learning)</p>

Assessment Framework (For, Of, As Learning)

The triadic framework categorizing assessment into Assessment FOR learning (informing teaching), Assessment OF learning (judging achievement), and Assessment AS learning (student self-monitoring).

19
New cards

Educational Objective

A statement describing an intended result of instruction—the performance a learner is expected to exhibit—rather than the instructional process itself.

20
New cards

Behaviour (Objective Attribute)

The element of a learning objective that uses an action verb to identify the observable performance or competency change to be learned.

21
New cards

Criterion (Objective Attribute)

The element of a learning objective that specifies the acceptable degree, accuracy, quantity, or proportion of correct responses required.

22
New cards

Conditions (Objective Attribute)

The element of a learning objective that describes the circumstances, context, or given materials under which the performance will occur.

23
New cards

Bloom's Taxonomy

A hierarchical structure formulated by Benjamin Bloom (1956) categorizing educational goals into Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor domains.

24
New cards

Cognitive Domain

The domain of Bloom's Taxonomy involving intellectual skills, recall, conceptual recognition, and problem-solving abilities.

25
New cards

Affective Domain

The domain of educational objectives related to emotional aspects, including feelings, values, appreciation, enthusiasms, motivations, and attitudes.

26
New cards

Psychomotor Domain

The domain of educational objectives focused on physical movement, kinesthetic skills, motor-skill precision, speed, and execution techniques.

27
New cards

Knowledge Level (Bloom's Cognitive Domain)

The foundational cognitive category focusing on the recall or recognition of specific facts, terms, procedural patterns, and ideas.

28
New cards

Comprehension Level (Bloom's Cognitive Domain)

The cognitive level where information is internalized, enabling the student to translate, interpret, discuss, or explain learned knowledge.

29
New cards

Application Level (Bloom's Cognitive Domain)

The cognitive level involving the selection and transfer of data, rules, or principles to complete a task or solve a novel problem.

30
New cards

Analysis Level (Bloom's Cognitive Domain)

The cognitive level centered on breaking down knowledge into parts, examining relationships, categorizing, and drawing logical conclusions.

31
New cards

Synthesis Level (Bloom's Cognitive Domain)

The creative cognitive level requiring students to integrate separate ideas or pieces of knowledge to construct a original whole structure.

32
New cards

Evaluation Level (Bloom's Cognitive Domain)

The cognitive level involving judgment and decision-making by appraising materials or performance against specific standards and criteria.

33
New cards
<p>Bloom's Revised Taxonomy</p>

Bloom's Revised Taxonomy

The 2001 revision by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl reordering cognitive levels using action verbs: Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating.

34
New cards

Learning Outcomes

Written statements indicating what a successful student is expected to know, understand, and/or demonstrate at the end of a learning activity or module.

35
New cards

SOLO Taxonomy

The Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes taxonomy developed by Biggs and Collis (1982) describing five levels of increasing complexity in student understanding.

36
New cards

Pre-structural Level (SOLO)

The SOLO stage where students acquire isolated, unconnected bits of information that lack overall organization and make no sense.

37
New cards

Unistructural Level (SOLO)

The SOLO stage where simple and obvious connections are made by the student, but their broader significance is not grasped.

38
New cards

Multistructural Level (SOLO)

The SOLO stage where multiple connections are made, but meta-connections and overall significance across the whole subject are missed.

39
New cards

Relational Level (SOLO)

The SOLO stage where the student appreciates the significance of individual parts in relation to the whole integrated concept.

40
New cards

Extended Abstract Level (SOLO)

The highest SOLO stage where the student generalizes and transfers underlying principles beyond the immediate given subject area.

41
New cards

Table of Specification (Test Blueprint)

A two-way grid that outlines course content domain on one dimension and targeted student cognitive behaviors on the other to ensure representative test item sampling.

42
New cards

Achievement Test

An assessment instrument constructed to measure specific skills and knowledge learned in a given grade level or subject through planned instruction.

43
New cards

Aptitude Test

An assessment designed to measure a person's inherent capacity or logical reasoning ability to learn a given set of new information.

44
New cards

Critical Thinking Test

An aptitude measure evaluating reflective reasoning, analysis of written passages, and logical deduction to form coherent judgments.

45
New cards

Numerical Reasoning Test

An aptitude assessment evaluating logical thinking and problem-solving through quantitative data, charts, and numerical analysis.

46
New cards

Perceptual Speed Test

An aptitude measure testing the ability to quickly and accurately compare letters, numbers, objects, pictures, or patterns.

47
New cards

Spatial Visualization Test

An aptitude assessment measuring the mental capacity to manipulate 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional shapes and visual figures.

48
New cards

Logical Reasoning Test

An aptitude test evaluating systematic reasoning skills using verbal, numerical, or diagrammatic picture-based problems.

49
New cards

Verbal Reasoning Test

An aptitude test evaluating how effectively an examinee can assess verbal logic and comprehend written text passages.

50
New cards

Attitude

A complex mental state involving beliefs, feelings, values, and dispositions that influence an individual's responses toward objects, people, or situations.

51
New cards

Cognitive Component of Attitude

The aspect of attitude relating to a person's general knowledge, ideas, and intellectual beliefs regarding a topic.

52
New cards

Affective Component of Attitude

The aspect of attitude involving emotional statements, feelings, likes, or dislikes that affect another person or situation.

53
New cards

Behavioral Component of Attitude

The aspect of attitude reflecting an individual's short-term or long-term behavioral intentions and actual actions.

54
New cards

Intelligence Quotient (IQ)

A numeric score derived from psychological tests measuring general mental ability and global intellectual capacity.

55
New cards

Verbal Intelligence

The ability to comprehend language, analyze written information, and solve language-based intellectual problems.

56
New cards

Nonverbal Intelligence

The ability to understand, assimilate, and solve visual, spatial, and novel diagrammatic problems independently of language skills.

57
New cards

Personality Trait

An enduring, relatively stable pattern of behavior and thinking that differentiates one individual from another across time and contexts.

58
New cards

Self-Report Inventory

A psychological personality assessment where respondents evaluate statements describing their own qualities, behaviors, and characteristics.

59
New cards

Likert Scale

A symmetric, bipolar psychometric rating scale measuring the level of agreement or disagreement with a series of statements.

60
New cards

Projective Test

A personality test presenting ambiguous stimuli to uncover an individual's unconscious thoughts, hidden emotions, and internal conflicts.

61
New cards

Rorschach Inkblot Test

A projective personality test created by Hermann Rorschach (1921) using 10 ambiguous inkblot cards to analyze examinee responses.

62
New cards

Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)

A projective test where examinees create stories about ambiguous picture scenes to reveal underlying motivations and anxieties.

63
New cards

Questionnaire

A research instrument containing a structured series of written questions used to gather quantifiable or qualitative data from respondents.

64
New cards

Structured Interview

A standardized interview format where predetermined questions are asked in a fixed sequence to ensure consistency and minimize bias.

65
New cards

Unstructured Interview

A flexible, non-directed interview format where questions are not preplanned, allowing open-ended exploration of candidate traits.

66
New cards

Group Interview

An assessment format where multiple candidates are interviewed together through group discussion to observe interpersonal behaviors.

67
New cards

Exit Interview

An interview conducted when an employee or student leaves an institution to determine reasons for departure and gather feedback.

68
New cards

Depth Interview

A semi-structured, intensive interview technique used to thoroughly explore an individual's detailed subject expertise and background.

69
New cards

Stress Interview

An interview designed to observe how a candidate behaves, keeps cool, or handles confusion under intentionally created high-pressure conditions.

70
New cards

Panel Interview

An interview conducted by an interview committee of three to five members who collectively question and rate candidates.

71
New cards

Behavioral Interview

An interview based on the principle that past behavior predicts future performance, asking candidates how they handled past situations.

72
New cards

Rating Scale

An assessment tool used to judge the degree, quality, or frequency of a task, trait, or procedure along a defined continuum.

73
New cards

Numerical Rating Scale

A rating scale where numbers are assigned to descriptive categories, allowing raters to mark a number indicating trait degree.

74
New cards

Graphic Rating Scale

A rating scale featuring descriptive points along a continuous line, allowing raters to mark their judgment anywhere along the line.

75
New cards

Standardized Test

A test administered, scored, and interpreted under consistent, uniform procedures to ensure comparable results across test takers.

76
New cards

Selection-Type Test Items

Objective test items where options are provided and examinees select the correct answer (e.g., MCQs, True/False, Matching).

77
New cards

Supply-Type Test Items

Subjective test items requiring examinees to construct and supply their own responses (e.g., Short Answer, Completion, Essay).

78
New cards

Multiple-Choice Question (MCQ)

A selection item format consisting of a problem stem and a list of alternative choices, including one correct key and several distracters.

79
New cards

Stem (MCQ)

The introductory portion of a multiple-choice item that formulates the problem as a direct question or incomplete statement.

80
New cards

Key (MCQ)

The single correct or clearly best response option among the choices in a multiple-choice question.

81
New cards

Distracters (MCQ)

Plausible but incorrect alternative response choices designed to draw less knowledgeable examinees away from the correct key.

82
New cards

Direct Question Stem Format

A multiple-choice stem structure framed explicitly as a full question ending with a question mark.

83
New cards

Incomplete Statement Stem Format

A multiple-choice stem structure written as an unfinished sentence completed by choosing one of the alternatives.

84
New cards

True/False Test Item

A binary-choice objective item requiring the examinee to determine whether a given declarative statement is true or false.

85
New cards

Matching Test Items

An objective test format consisting of two parallel columns (premises and responses) where examinees associate related pairs.

86
New cards

Premises (Matching Items)

The items or questions listed in the left-hand column of a matching exercise to which responses must be paired.

87
New cards

Responses (Matching Items)

The options listed in the right-hand column of a matching exercise from which examinees select matching choices.

88
New cards

Completion Test Items

A supply item format requiring examinees to fill in one or more missing key words or numbers in a sentence blank.

89
New cards

Short-Answer Test Items

A supply item format requiring a brief response consisting of a single word, phrase, number, or symbol.

90
New cards

Essay Test Items

A constructed-response test item requiring examinees to compose a detailed written answer demonstrating recall, organization, and higher-order thinking.

91
New cards

Restricted-Response Essay Items

An essay question posing a specific problem with defined limitations on response content, length, or structure.

92
New cards

Extended-Response Essay Items

An essay question granting examinees full freedom to determine the complexity, organization, length, and scope of their written response.

93
New cards

Test Reliability

The degree to which test scores are consistent, stable, and reproducible over repeated measurements or equivalent test forms.

94
New cards

Inter-Rater Reliability

The degree of consistency or percentage agreement between two or more independent raters or observers scoring the same test or performance.

95
New cards

Test-Retest Reliability

A reliability measure estimated by administering the exact same test to the same sample on two separate occasions.

96
New cards

Parallel-Form Reliability

A reliability measure estimated by administering two equivalent, independently constructed test forms to the same group.

97
New cards

Internal Consistency Reliability

The degree to which items within a single test instrument measure the same construct consistently.

98
New cards

Split-Half Reliability

An internal consistency estimate obtained by splitting a test into two equivalent halves (e.g., odd/even) and correlating the half scores.

99
New cards

Spearman-Brown Prophecy Formula

The mathematical formula used to estimate full-test reliability from split-half correlation: rfull=2rhalf1+rhalfr_{\text{full}} = \frac{2 r_{\text{half}}}{1 + r_{\text{half}}}.

100
New cards

Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20)

An internal consistency formula for dichotomously scored items that accounts for individual item difficulty levels.