Cambridge International AS & A Level Thinking Skills 9694 Syllabus Overview

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/19

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

A collection of vocabulary flashcards highlighting key flaws and weaknesses in reasoning as outlined in the Cambridge International AS & A Level Thinking Skills syllabus.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

Equivocation

The use of ambiguous language to conceal the truth or to mislead.

2
New cards

Conflation

Combining two distinct concepts into one, leading to confusion.

3
New cards

Circular argument

An argument that begins with its conclusion as one of its premises.

4
New cards

Begging the question

Assuming the conclusion within the premises, making the argument invalid.

5
New cards

Invalid deduction

A reasoning process that arrives at a conclusion that does not logically follow from the premises.

6
New cards

Causal flaw

Faulty reasoning that improperly assumes a cause-and-effect relationship.

7
New cards

Rash generalisation

A hasty conclusion made without adequate evidence.

8
New cards

Sweeping generalisation

Applying a general rule to a specific case without considering exceptions.

9
New cards

False dichotomy

Presenting two options as the only possibilities, ignoring alternatives.

10
New cards

Slippery slope argument

Assuming that a relatively small first step will inevitably lead to a chain of related events culminating in significant impact.

11
New cards

Ad hominem

An argument that attacks a person's character instead of addressing the issue.

12
New cards

Tu quoque

A counter-accusation intended to discredit the opponent's argument.

13
New cards

Straw man argument

Misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack.

14
New cards

Post hoc

Assuming that because one event follows another, the first event must be the cause of the second.

15
New cards

Support weakness

When reasoning supports only part of the conclusion drawn from it.

16
New cards

Consistency weakness

When one part of reasoning contradicts or is inconsistent with another part.

17
New cards

Unsupported claim

A statement that is not backed by evidence or sound reasoning.

18
New cards

Analogy

A comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.

19
New cards

Appeal

An attempt to persuade based on external factors such as authority or emotion.

20
New cards

Responding to counter

Addressing objections to strengthen an argument.