POlS 341 - Jeopardy set

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 28

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

29 Terms

1

McCulloch v. Maryland

This case affirmed the federal government's power to create the national bank under the necessary and proper clause.

New cards
2

US v. Pink and Belmont

The Supreme Court ruled that state policies were preempted by an executive agreement.

New cards
3

Rucho v. Common Cause

This case held that partisan gerrymandering is a nonjusticiable political question.

New cards
4

Marbury v. Madison

This case established judicial review in the United States.

New cards
5

Schechter Poultry Corp v US

This case upheld commerce power to regulate interstate commerce but invalidated the delegation of rulemaking to private parties.

New cards
6

Luther v. Borden

The court dismissed this case based on the Article 4 republican form of government clause.

New cards
7

Mootness

An exception to this citing is 'capable of repetition, yet evading review.'

New cards
8

Political questions

This doctrine arises when an issue is constitutionally committed to another branch.

New cards
9

Walter Nixon v. U.S.

In this case, the court dismissed a challenge to Senate impeachment procedure as a political question.

New cards
10

Lujan v Defenders of Wildlife

The court found a lack of standing and dismissed this case involving wildlife preservation overseas.

New cards
11

Youngstown Sheet

In this case, the court invalidated an executive order seizing mills during wartime.

New cards
12

What is the (non) delegation doctrine?

This doctrine evaluates whether Congress has provided sufficient guidance to federal agencies in delegating authority.

New cards
13

Checks and balances

Executive—veto power; Legislative—approve treaties; Courts—declare laws unconstitutional.

New cards
14

Reynolds v. Sims

The 'one person one vote' principle was established in this case involving legislative apportionment.

New cards
15

What is the political question doctrine?

This doctrine prevents courts from addressing cases without judicially manageable standards.

New cards
16

Ripeness

This doctrine allows the Supreme Court to dismiss undeveloped cases.

New cards
17

Intelligible principles test

This test determines whether the congressional delegation of power to agencies meets constitutional requirements.

New cards
18

Missouri v Holland

This case upheld the federal government's treaty power even when it conflicted with state sovereignty.

New cards
19

Federalist #51

This paper justified the need for checks and balances to control government power.

New cards
20

Federalist #78

This paper describes the judiciary as the least dangerous branch.

New cards
21

Compact theory

The Virginia resolution invokes this theory arguing that states may resist unconstitutional laws.

New cards
22

Faction

In Federalist 10, Madison used this term for a group initiated by a passion or interest adverse to others' rights.

New cards
23

Extending the sphere

Madison used this phrase to explain that a larger republic would better control factions.

New cards
24

U.S. v. Curtis Wright

This case upheld the president's authority as the 'sole organ' of foreign affairs.

New cards
25

NYC v. Clinton

In this case, the court struck down an over delegation of power to the president.

New cards
26

What is Zivotofsky v. Kerry?

This case upheld the president's sole power to recognize foreign governments.

New cards
27

US v Nixon

This case rejected executive privileges as a defense against a subpoena during a criminal investigation.

New cards
28

Clinton v Jones

This case addressed whether the president has immunity for actions taken before assuming office.

New cards
29

Strict Scrutiny (U.S. v. Carolene Products)

In this case, the court wrote that there may be a narrower scope and provided this doctrine.

New cards
robot