1/41
Social Psychology @ Georgia Tech
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Social psychology
The study of how the actual, implied, and imagined presence of others influences our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors
The three kinds of presence
Implied
Actual
Imagined
Kurt Lewis’ Framework
Both personal and situational factors influence behavior
Two axioms of social psychology
Constructivism
Situationism
Constructivism
our view of reality is shaped by cognitive and social processes —> we actively CREATE much of what we see and remember, and there is no objective reality
Situationism
perception is not passive —> the primary determinant of behavior are situational cues/conduct, NOT underlying personality
Social cognition
How people select, remember, and use social information to make judgements and decisions
Two kinds of thinking
Quick and Associative (Experimental system)
Slow and Deliberate (Cognitive system)
Characteristics of Quick and Automatic thinking
Must have one of:
Lack of awareness
Lack of control
Lack of conscious intent
Efficiency
Not consciously initiated, determined by external situations, can’t be controlled
Most of our thinking surrounding perception of people is automatic
The cognitive system
A conscious, rational, and controlled way of thinking
Organization of memory
We naturally group information about similar subjects together in our minds
Categorization
Placing new experiences into existing categories (schemas)
Schema
A mental framework, derived from past experiences, that contains a person’s beliefs, feelings, and expectations about categories
—> a schema with information about yourself is called a self-schema
Schemas are as much a part of memory as perception — we fill in the gaps with schemas
Over time, changes in schemas can ALTER existing memories (EX: Mandela Effect)
2 kinds of accessibility
Chronic accessibility
Temporal accessibility
Chronic accessibility
Developed through long-term experiences, repeated exposure, or personal significance
Temporal accessibility
Triggered by recent events, priming, or situational context.
Priming
Using recent experience to increase the accessibility of a schema, trait, or concept. Priming is an automatic (unconscious) thought process
The Perseverance Effect
People’s beliefs about themselves and the social world tend to persist even after the evidence supporting the beliefs is discredited
Self-fulfilling prophecy
When initial expectations cause fulfillment of those expectations
Attitude
an evaluation of something along a positive —> negative spectrum
3 components of attitude
Affect — how you feel about something, how much you like/dislike something
Behavior — we approach things we find rewarding and avoid things we find punishing
Cognition — current thoughts/knowledge/beliefs about something
Accessibility
How much a concept is at the forefront of your mind
Response latency
How long it takes you to access a certain schema in your mind
—> a quicker response may demonstrate a stronger attitude (either positive or negative) towards that subject
Centrality
How important attitude is to a person — measured by measuring a variety of related attitudes and calculating how strongly they are related to each other
Implicit attitude
non-conscious attitude — controversial, but implicit attitudes may impact our behavior without us being aware of it at all — to measure these, we must use indirect measures of attitude that do not include self reporting
Relationship between attitude and behavior
While attitude is often assumed to predict behavior, research has shown that this is not always the case.
The higher the accessibility, the more likely an attitude is to affect a behavior
—> also, whether the attitude and behavior are at the same level of specificity
Cognitive dissonance
An unpleasant state that arises when a person recognizes an inconsistency between actions and beliefs
When does cognitive dissonance happen?
When the behavior was freely chosen
When the behavior was insufficiently justified
When the behavior has predictable negative consequences
Rationalization
A process that occurs both before and after a choice is made in order to help us feel good about a decision and its consequences
Effort justification
Tendency to reduce dissonance by justifying the time, effort, or money devoted to something that turned out to be unpleasant
EX: a degree, parenting
Self-affirmation
Sure, I did *** awful thing *** but I also did ***great thing***
Forced compliance
Compelling someone to behave in a way that is inconsistent with their beliefs — when forced, we tend to act like we wanted to do it all along
When trying to change someone’s attitude, use the smallest amount of coercion necessary
Reward too substantial = won’t change underlying attitude
The self-perception theory
A theory that challenges cognitive dissonance:
Claims that attitudes are inferred from behaviors instead of introspection
Used when no existing attitude towards a behavior is present, rather than cognitive dissonance, which is used when a behavior conflicts with a pre-existing strong attitude
Self-knowledge
any of the many descriptions we have for ourselves
Forms of social interaction through which we learn about ourselves
Appraisals from others
Social comparisons
Self perceptions
Appraisals from others
We use both explicit + implicit perceptions to determine who we are
Social comparisons
Downward comparison
Comparing to those worse off
Upward comparison
Comparing to those better off
** Usually, we tend to compare ourselves the most to people we find similar to us
Self perception
We learn about ourselves the most in new/unusual situations
Self concept
All of our self-schemas together + the way they are organized
Integrated self-concept
Self schemas contain a mix of both positive and negative attributes
More level “mood” and self-esteem
Compartmentalized self-concept
Self-schemas are almost uniformly positive/negative
Prone to experiencing “high highs and low lows” depending on which schema is activated