1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
grounded theory
a qualitative research method where you do not start with a hypothesis. Instead, you gather stories or interviews, look for patterns in what people say, and let those patterns shape your understanding. You build your ideas “from the ground up” based on the data, not from assumptions. Researchers collect data, code it, identify themes, compare new data with earlier themes, and gradually build a theory that explains what they are seeing.
Attempts to derive theories from an analysis of the patterns, themes, and common categories discovered among observational data.
Longest most involved research method
Constant Comparative
content analysis
Descriptive (describes what is there). Focuses on manifest content. Describes the frequencies and compares. Lots of counting, which can initially confuse you with quantitative if you’re just looking for numbers v. words to differentiate quant/qual methods. Develops those frequent codes into larger categories.
Quantifying: counts/frequencies
Describes the characteristics of the content
simple reporting of common issues
creates codes and categories based on semantic/manifest content
can use latent content, but not always.
Surface level qualitative research.
thematic analysis
Develop themes and look t the “big picture” of the results. Combines categories into themes. Requires a lot more analysis and combine latent and manifest content.
Qualifying.
Rich, detailed, complex account of the data.
Looks for the common threads
The importance of a theme is not necessarily dependent on how often something comes up, but rather on whether it captures something important in relation to the overall research question.
Latent and semantic/manifest content are inseparable and always done together.
photovoice
People in the community take pictures of a particular issue/topic
group discussion over: meaning, why, and solutions.
SHOWD (focus group)
what do you SEE here
what is really HAPPENING
how does this relate to OUR lives
WHY does this exist
what can we DO about it
Caption writing
Analyzing data
participants name themes and organize the themes
Host a photo exhibit with Stakeholders
Follow up activities
MAKE AN ASK
WANT A SOCIAL CHANGE AS A RESULT
Reliability and validity in qualitative
Qualitative researchers study and describe things from multiple perspectives and meanings.
Less emphasis on whether one particular measure is really measuring what it’s intended to measure.
By describing things in great depth and detail and from multiple perspectives and meanings, there is less concern about whether one particular measure is really measuring what it is intended to measure
To check for reliability:
Triangulation: using different perspectives to check
Assess whether two independent raters arrive at the same interpretation
Inter rater reliability: multiple people agreeing on how relation an intervention is (i.e 80% agreement rate)
Asking the research participants to confirm the accuracy of observations
To check for validity:
“Internally consistent” arguments: how is this consistent w/ research? are people saying the same thing?
Complete interpretation: does this coincide w/ the theory
Convictions: interpretation given the evidenve within the text, use a lot of examples.
Meaningful: is it meaningful?
Three key threats to trustworthiness:
reactivity
researcher bias
respondent bias
Strategies to minimize threats:
prolonged engagement: lived experience, professional experience
triangulation
peer debriefing and support: take results and talk to other researchers for their opinions
negative case analysis: looking for contradicting research
member checking: taking it back
auditing: having external professionals look at the research in audit it
Types of coding
Hypothesis-driven coding: involves generating codes based on theory a priori. driven by a theory we already have (like modeling behaviors, and social learning theory)
Open coding: categorizing information through close examination and questioning the data. Looks at data and let it talk. Getting codes from data.
Types of memoing
Code notes: notes made while doing the coding
Theoretical notes:
Operational notes:
Types of Interviewing
Completely unstructured: sit down and talk w/o leading/informal conversational
Semi-structured: provides outline for researcher but not set in stone
High-structured: written qualitative interview/standardized interviews
Community-Based Participatory Action Research
Implicit belief that research functions not only as means of knowledge production but also as a tool for education and development of consciousness as well as mobilization for action.
Typically used with disadvantaged groups
Participants define their problems, define the remedies desired, and take the lead in designing the research that will help them reach their arms.