1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Election of 1800 party divide
-feds: stronger national gov, GB in Euro affairs
-demo repubs: state power, lean to French
Election of 1800 tariffs
-both parties support! Raise revenue
-more of a sectional issue tho
-Northern industrialists- yes! Higher tariffs protect companies from foreign competition - BUY
-Southern farmers: no! Relied on exports of cotton and other crops. Pushed for lower tariffs to encourage TRADE
Election of 1800 results
• Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr tied
• So, house of reps voted and chose Thomas Jefferson
- Largely bc Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson has a structure and goal, unlike Aaron Burr.
Election of 1800 results, House n Senate
-both Demo repubs
Election of 1800 PEACEFUL REV
-This passing of power (feds to demo repubs) was peaceful
-major indication that US constitution system would endure various strains put on it
-feds quietly accept defeat!
Jefferson Presidency overall FIRST TERM
-tried to win allegiance from Fed opps by maintaining National Bank n debt repayment plan
-carried neutrality policy (Washington n Adam’s)
-Demo Repub policy: LIMITED CENTRAL GOV
-reduced military size
-eliminated some fed jobs
-replied the excise taxes
-decreased national debt
Jefferson Presidency Louisiana Purchase
-Spain, then France ownership
-Napoleon Bonaparte sold it to Thomas Jefferson bc:
wanted to concentrate French resources on fighting Great Britain
A rebellion led by Toussaint Louverture against French rule on the island of Santo Domingo had resulted in heavy French losses.
Jefferson- interest in Mississippi River
-western frontier depended on transportation of goods in the rivers
1803, Spanish officials (NOLA) closed power to Americans
Revoked the right of deposit in Pinckney Treaty of 1795 - allowed American farmers to use port tax free
Jefferson feared that if a foreign power continued to have river at NOLA in control, US risk entanglement in Europe affairs
Jefferson land negotiations
sent ministers to France to offer 10 million for NOLA n strip of land from there to eastward to Florida
France offered wanted money after their war against GB, so sold Louisiana Territory and NOLA for 15 million
Jefferson LT contradiction
Jefferson committed to STRICT INTERPRETATION of constitution
^ contrasted his actions of purchasing territory. No clause explicitly says that a president can purchase land
Jefferson just kinda set his ideals to the side for his country’s good
LT purchase effects
-Increased Jefferson’s popularity and showed that fed weak
-Increased Jefferson’s hope of an agrarian society of farmers than Hamilton’s urban n industrial party
-extended western frontier
-doubled size of US
-removed Euro presence
Lewis n Clark expedition
-Jefferson persuaded Congress to fund scientific exploration of trans Mississippi West
-LT purchase increased importance of this
Benefits
-greater geo and scientific knowledge of that regions
-stronger US claims to that territory
-better relations to Natives
-More accurate maps
Jefferson Re-election Burr Opp
-TLDR: an Opp that couldn’t handle losing the election and was into conspiracies, hated AH and Jefferson
-Aaron Burr formed a political pact w some radical NE feds
-planned to win governorship of NY (1804) and lead this group of states to secede from the nations
-Most feds following AH opposed Burr
-lost NY governorship and faded
-challenged AH to a duel n shot him
-deprived feds of last great leader
-many ppl dont like Burr now
-planned to win to take Mexico from Spain and unit it with Louisiana under his rule. Jefferson found out n ordered him to be arrested.
John Marshall
-only federalist official to have a major influence in Demo Republic ascendancy
-favored central gov
-rights of prop against advocates of states rights
-most Demo Repub presidents often sided with him even tho the party difference. This is bc they were persuaded that the US Constitution had created fed gov w strong and flexible powers
Marburg v Madison results in what
Establishment of judicial review
Madison vs Marbury (1803)
Issue: William Marbury sued for his judicial commission that was withheld by James Madison. (Midnight appointments)
Ruling: Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that Marbury had a right to the commission but that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional because it gave the Court powers not granted by the Constitution.
Significance: Established judicial review—the Supreme Court’s power to declare laws of Congress or actions of the president unconstitutional.
Fletcher v. Peck (1810)
Issue: Georgia tried to void land sales that were part of a previous corrupt deal.
Ruling: The Court ruled that a state could not pass a law invalidating a legal contract.
Significance: First time the Supreme Court declared a state law unconstitutional, reinforcing protection of contracts
Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee (1816)
Issue: A Virginia court refused to recognize a federal treaty regarding land ownership.
Ruling: The Supreme Court asserted its authority over state courts in cases involving federal law or the Constitution.
Significance: Confirmed Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction over state courts in constitutional matters.
Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819)
Issue: New Hampshire tried to convert Dartmouth College from a private to a public institution.
Ruling: The Court said the state couldn’t alter the college’s charter.
Significance: Protected private contracts from state interference and strengthened business interests.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Issue: Maryland attempted to tax the Second Bank of the United States.
Ruling: The Court declared that states could not tax federal institutions and upheld Congress’s implied power to create a national bank.
Significance: Confirmed federal supremacy over the states and established the doctrine of implied powers.
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Issue: New York granted a steamboat monopoly that conflicted with federal licensing laws.
Ruling: The monopoly was unconstitutional.
Significance: Expanded federal power over interstate commerce, establishing that only Congress could regulate interstate trade
Cohens v. Virginia (1821)
Issue: The Cohen brothers were convicted under Virginia law for selling D.C. lottery tickets.
Ruling: The Court upheld their conviction but affirmed its right to review state court decisions in cases involving federal authority.
Significance: Reinforced federal judicial authority over state courts in federal matters
Election of 1808
James Madison
-democratic republican but switches easily
-weak public speaker
-possessed a stubborn temperament
-lacked political skills
-Jefferson helped him be nominated for president
able to win!