3.2 Models of Memory (Multi-store Model)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/32

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

33 Terms

1
New cards

What is Memory?

Memory refers to the processes by which we encode, store, and retrieve information over time.

2
New cards

Memory for humans

Mental Capacity allows to remember:

  • past experiences - learn from them

  • use knowledge to guide behaviour in present and future

3
New cards

who first proposed the multi-store model

Atikinson and Shifrin 1968

4
New cards

Multi-store model

Three separate components:

  • Sensory

  • Short-term

  • Long-term

    Each has its own capacity and duration

    To move to next store, certain conditions required

5
New cards

Sensory Model

Sensory memory doesn’t store or process info

Detect info and hold it for STM or lost

6
New cards

Components of Sensory memory

Several sub components:

  • Visual

  • Auditory

  • Olfactory etc.

    • most research focused iconic and echoic memory

7
New cards

Stats for sensory

Limited by perception

Duration is short (iconic: 1 second / echoic: 2-5 seconds)

8
New cards

Stats for STM

STM: 7(+-2) units of information / duration = dependent of modality but no longer than 30 seconds

If unattended, fades away after 30 seconds

To move to LTM - rehearsal

9
New cards

Stats for LTM

Large amount of info for indefinite amount of time

Unlimited and unlimited

However, not easily retrievable

10
New cards

Limitations of MSM

  • The model is over-simplified. It assumes that each of the stores works as an independent unit

  • Does not explain memory distortion

11
New cards

Peterson and Peterson aim

Peterson and Peterson aimed to investigate the duration of the short-term memory and provide empirical evidence for the multi-store model.

12
New cards

Peterson and Peterson year

1959

13
New cards

Method

True Laboratory Experiment

14
New cards

Design

Repeated Measures Design

15
New cards

Sampling Strategy

Convenience; 24 psychology students

16
New cards

IV

Time delay before recall

17
New cards

DV

Recall accuracy of trigrams

18
New cards

Procedure 1

Participants asked to recall trigrams (e.g. TGH) after intervals of 3,6,9 - 18)

19
New cards

Procedure 2

During interval, backwards in 3’s - prevent rehearsal
Repeated several times with different trigrams

20
New cards

Findings 1

Longer interval - less recall
80% - 3 seconds
10% - 18 seconds

21
New cards

Conclusion 1

Short-term mem - limited duration when rehearsal is prevented
Info lost due to trace delay
Support difference between STM and LTM

Supports MSM

22
New cards

What study should be used with Peterson and Peterson for ERQ question on models of memory

Baddeley et al.

23
New cards

Baddeley et al. Year

1975

24
New cards

Aim

To investigate the effect of word length on short-term memory capacity, supporting the phonological loop

25
New cards

Method

True Laboratory experiment

26
New cards

Design

Repeated Measures design

27
New cards

Sampling strategy

Opportunity sampling; 72 participants

28
New cards

IV

Length of words

29
New cards

DV

Number of words correctly recalled in order

30
New cards

Procedure 1

Ppts shown a list of 5 words: either 1 syllable or 5+ syllables

31
New cards

Procedure 2

Asked to immediately recall them in order

Repeated with different word lists

32
New cards

Findings

Short words were recalled significantly better than long words

Number of words recalled matches what could be spoken in 1.5-2 seconds (word-length effect)

When rehearsal was suppressed, world length effect disappeared

33
New cards

Conclusion

STM capacity is limited by time, not number of items

People can recall as many words as they can say in 2 seconds

Supports phonological loop.