1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
when does citizen participation happen in the policy process?
most prevalent in formulation, agenda setting and implementation
examples on how citizens can be involved in democratic governance/decision making
voting, joining political parties, attending political protests, writing op eds
ideal use of citizen participation
public participation involves convening diverse groups of people, educating them about the topic, get them to recommend a policy option based on the information given
how is citizen participation different from lobbying?
lobbying = efforts to convince public officials that a particular view/course of action is correct (done TO gov)
citizen participation = initiated BY gov
3 categories of scoring citizen participation
passive
hybrid forms
active
passive scoring of CP
government for the people
agency decides on recommendation and citizens are just reacting to the decision
hybrid scoring of CP
collaborative network paradigm
gov by the people
agency decides on the recommendation but citizens advise
active scoring of CP
government by the people
citizens decide on the recommendation but agency plays a consulting role
advantages to CP (Decision process)
education (learn from and inform gov representatives)
persuade and enlighten government
gain skills for activist citizens
increase trust in gov
advantages to government (deicison process)
education (learn from and inform citizens)
persuade citizens (build trust and allay anxiety and hostility)
build strategic alliances
gain legitimacy of decisions
advantages of CP (outcomes)
break gridlock of ideas (achieve outcomes)
gain some control over the policy process
better policy implementation decisions
advantages to gov (outcomes)
break gridlock (achieve outcomes)
avoid litigation costs
better policy implementation decisions
disadvantages to CP (decision process)
time consuming
pointless if decision is ignored
review and comment methodology
review and comment methodology
public input is only sought after solutions are already implemented
more about presenting info to citizens rather than listening to what they have to say
disadvantages to gov (decision process)
time consuming
costly (time and money)
may backfire creating more hostility toward gov
disadvantages to CP (outcomes)
worse policy decision if heavily influenced by opposing interest
issue if citizen's chosen are not properly representative of the national mood
disadvantages to gov (outcomes)
loss of decision making control
possibility of bad decision that is politically impossible to ignore
less budget for implementation of actual projects
purpose of policy implementation
translating policy choices into action
implementation (def)
set of activities directed to putting a policy into effect
passing of the law signifies the ending of the implementation process (myth, what is reality?)
design and passing of the law is the beginning, implementation effects people and businesses after initial implementation
why is implementation important? (2)
affects more people than they realize
most contracts with government occur during implementation
optimism bias
gov officials assume any potential problems with the policy will not materialize in the end
what does the top down approach to implementation focus on?
emphasis is on the policy decision
"carrying out of a basic policy decision, usually made in a statute)
top down approach - what does the decision identify (3)? (what does it replicate?)
identifies the problem, stipulates objectives, and structures implementation
(replicates 3 components of policies - prob definition, objectives, implementation)
factors affecting implementation (3) (in top down approach)
the tractability of the problem
the ability of the statute to structure implementation
non-statutory variable affecting implementation
tractability of the problem
about how easy/difficult the problem is to address
e.x. vehicle idling laws are easier to address than homelessness
easier issue = easier implementation
ability of the statute to structure implementation
the extent to which the policy itself coherently structures the implementation process
nonstatutory variables affecting implementation
balance of support for the policy
level of political support a policy can maintain over time
whats going on in the world, and all of the actors
bottom up approach to implementation (what does it focus on?)
concerned with the strategies of actors
want to know about the interactions between these actors in the implementation stage
(SLB's, private and not-for profit sectors)
method for bottom up approach
identify local actors
ask them about goals, activities and contacts
evaluate significance of government action compared to other influences
main elements of the combined model for implementation (6)
policy design
inter-organizational communication and enforcement capacity
characteristics of the implementing agencies/dispositions of implementers
connecting implementation outputs to their outcomes/impacts
policy learning
managing the action environment
policy design
policy content and resources (standards, objectives, resources given)
inter-organizational communication and enforcement capacity
multilevel governance (principle-agent accountability relationships come in)
characteristics of the implementing agencies/dispositions of implementers
factors like organizational leadership, culture and norms come into play
managing the action environment
public sector institutional environment
economic, social and political conditions
could make the policy not doable (e.x. $10/day daycare policy, but if there is not enough workers to supply the care, the policy cannot be as effective as it should have been)