Statistical inference
drawing a conclusion about a population parameter based on a sample statistic
Confidence Interval
used to estimate the value of a parameter with a range of plausible values
estimate population proportion(p) with a z test
" I am % confident that the true proportional of ALL is within the interval__to__)
Width of CI=1/ān
CI increase āwidth increase āz* increase
CI decrease āwidth decrease āME and SE decrease
MORE narrow graph
decrease CI or Increase n
Higher CI
accept a wider interval OR increase n
*MUST compare to population, not only the sample
1 Proportion Z test
Confidence Level
āif you took ____samples and constructed the resulting confidence interval, the true proportion of ALL___ will be in __%(as a number) of these intervalsā
increase
Significance test
Assess the plausibility of a particular claim about a parameter
TEST claim about the population(p) with a z-interval
CONDITIONS
Random sample(SRS)
n1 p1 >=10, n1(1- p1 )>=10
The sample size is <= 10% of the population size
condition of independence & not population >10n =okay!
the increase in variation due to the dependence almost offsets the decrease due to a relatively large sample
STEPS
Title
Conditions
Hypothesis, label
Test statisticāpvalueādiagram(if need)
Conclusion in context, doubts of validity
Compare p-value with Ī±, level of significance
compare test stat to z*
āSince p value _Ī±, there is/is not statistically significant evidence to reject the null hypothesis, that is there is/is not statistically significant evidenceā¦ā
Pooled estimate
pĢ =total success in BOTH sample size/total sample size
means and standard error of sampling distribution formula
P value
probability of obtaining a sample statistics as EXTREME or MORE EXTREME than one obtained by the null hypotheses( Ho ) is assumed to be true
small(<0.05,0.1)ā sufficient evidence to reject Ho
z*
Critical z
Ways to increase z*
farther pĢ from p
sample size decrease
po farther from 0.5
Margin of error
exactly Ā½ the width of CI
determined byā¦
small MOEā large n
how MUCH statistic typically varies from parameter ĻpĢ
how confident do we want our answer to be z*
MATH
z*ā((pĢ(1-pĢ))/n
use 0.5 for pĢ if not given
Hypothesis
Ho = null hypothesis, must use an = sign
Ha= alternate hypothesis, can use <, >, <=,>=, ā
defines the parameter of interest ā refers to the population
pĢ
sample proportion
po
assumed proportion in the null hypotheses(Ho ), the given in text
2 tail
ā
2p(z____)
1 tail
either < or >
in context, could be testing for strength, effectivenessā¦
Errors
are inversely related
Type I error (Ī±)
rejecting the null hypotheses(Ho ) when it is true
increase if Ī± increase
Type II error(Ī²)
failing to reject null hypotheses(Ho )when its false
MORE likely for small n
*the only way to have power
Power
(1-Ī²)
probability that type II error does not occur ā correctly rejecting null hypotheses(Ho )when its false
influenced by Ī±
Power Increase byā¦
n Increase
Ī± Increase
SE decrease
True parameter further from null
Difference of 2 Proportions
CONDITIONS
2 samples are taken randomly or randomly assigned
n1pĢ1 , n1(1-pĢ1), n2pĢ2, n2(1-pĢ2) >=5
The sample size is <= 10% of the population size
Confidence Interval of Difference of 2 Proportions
Captures 0
yes ā __% confident that there is no difference between p1 and p2
āmeans that 1 value is positive, 1 value is negative
no ā __% confident that there is a difference between p1 and p2
ānot plausible for there to be no difference
n can sometimes be split in half
āthe true difference in proportion between___and___isā
2 groups having the SAME āproportionāā risk ratio =1, so for a positive/greater proportion than the other CI range is the decimal +1.
Test statistic of Difference of 2 Proportions
STEPS
name 2 proportion z test
result ā C up, C Low
Conditions
Hypotheses
Test statistic ā p value ā diagram(if need)
Conclusion in context, doubts of validity
compare p value and Ī±