A-level psychology: Bocchiaro's study

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/34

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

disobedience and whistleblowing

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

35 Terms

1
New cards

what was the background of Bocchiaro's study?

Bocchiaro's inspiration came from Milgram's study. he noted that Milgram only focused on obedience and he was interested in disobedience (particularly whistleblowing) to authority and what made people disobedient (personality)

2
New cards

what is meant by the term whistleblowing or being a whistle blower?

to expose information

3
New cards

what is meant by sensory deprivation?

to have lack of senses

4
New cards

what year did Bocchiaro's study take place?

2012

5
New cards

what method was used in Bocchiaro's study?

it was in a controlled observation

6
New cards

were was the location of Bocchiaro's study?

it was done in a VU university, Amsterdam (prestigious school)

7
New cards

what data was gathered in Bocchiaro's study?

the number of participants who obeyed by writing a statement and those who disobeyed and those who became whistle blowers

8
New cards

what was the sample in Bocchiaro's study?

149 undergraduate students, 96 women and 53 men

9
New cards

what was the original sample and why was it changed?

the original sample was 160 undergraduate students, but 11 people were removed because they were suspicious of the nature of the study

10
New cards

what was done before the study took place?

Bocchiaro completed 8 pilot studies before the real study with 92 students to make sure the procedure was ethical

11
New cards

what was the cover story in Bocchiaro's study?

the experimenter told the participants about an experiment that took place in Rome where they were investigating the effect of sensory deprivation on the brain.

12
New cards

6 participants were used where they were were isolated, unable to see or hear - they panicked and their cognitive abilities were temporarily impaired and had they had severe hallucinations. 2 participants asked to stop but were told they were not allowed because it would ruin the study.

13
New cards
14
New cards

The experimenter then said that they wanted to replicate the study at the university on students, as there was no data on the effects on young people

15
New cards

before the study, what did the experimenter ask the participant?

he asked them to provide a list of names of their peers/ classmates

16
New cards

what was done in the first room

the participant was told about a university research committee and their evaluation on whether to approve the study, so they were collecting feedback from students. forms were in the next room

17
New cards
18
New cards

they were also told that they were to write a statement to convince the students that they had named to participate in the study, statements would be sent via email

19
New cards
20
New cards

the experimenter left the room for 3 minutes so that the participant could think about their decision

21
New cards

what was n the second room?

participants were moved to another room where there was a computer for them to use to write their statement, a mailbox and the research committee forms

22
New cards

what were the participants offered if they contributed to the study?

participants were paid 7 euros or given course credit

23
New cards

what were the participants instructed to include in their statement?

they were told to be enthusiastic and they had to include two adjectives such as 'exciting and incredible '

24
New cards

what were the participants told NOT to include in their statement?

they were told not to mention the negative effects of the sensory deprivation

25
New cards

how long did the experimenter leave the participant alone in the second room?

he left the room for 7 minutes, where the participant would make their decision

26
New cards

how many people said they would obey the experimenter in the comparison group?

3.6% said they would obey

27
New cards

how many people said they would be disobedient in the comparison group?

3.9% said they would disobey

28
New cards

hoe many people said they would blow the whistle in the comparison group?

64.5% said they would whistleblow

29
New cards

how many people actually obeyed?

76.5%

30
New cards

how many people actually disobeyed?

14.1%

31
New cards

how many people actually blew the whistle?

9.4%

32
New cards

what were the strengths in Bocchiaro's study?

it was easy to analyse because the comparison group data in comparison to the actual data allowed them to establish if there was a link to personality and the likelihood to obey

33
New cards

the sample was a mix of both women and men

34
New cards

what were the weaknesses in Bocchiaro's study?

all the participants came from the same place meaning that it didn't represent other peoples behaviour from other countries.

35
New cards

the participants were also quite young which didn't represent other age groups