Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Idiographic vs nomothetic approaches
Considers whether it is more important to establish norms across groups, or to study the individual- seeing them as unique
Which approach is more appropriate in aiding our understanding of behaviour?
Nomothetic approach
Establishing general laws of behaviour based on the study of large groups of participants
Research methods used in nomothetic approach
Experiments, correlations, meta analysis
Uses statistical analysis through quantitative data collection
Example of research using nomothetic approach
Milgram’s obedience research- collected quantitative data. Was controlled, reliable and internally valid
Research obedience and concluded that situational factors influence obedience on all individuals
Pros of nomothetic approach .
Controlled
Reliable
High internal validity
Large samples- generalisable
Statistical analysis- can identify patterns and trends
Cons of nomothetic approach
Not in depth/detailed- less likely to understand personal experience
Biological approach (nomothetic)
takes a nomothetic approach
Adopts scientific methods to identify trends and generate causal laws
E.g. When explaining psychological disorders (e.g. OCD) they pinpoint biological factors that tend to be responsible for disorders and use this law to inform treatments, such as drug therapies, to treat all patients with
Psychopathology classification systems such as the DSM and ICD are used to diagnose psychological illness- nomothetic classification tools
behaviourism (nomothetic)
Behaviourists (e.g. Watson, Pavlov, Skinner)- conduct research using animals to draw general laws of learning, such as CC and OC.
They generalise these laws to humans and animals and these laws can be used in treatments (e.g. behaviourist approach for treating phobias- flooding and systematic desensitisation.
Idiographic approach
Focuses of the individual and emphasise unique personal experience
It emphasises free will and does not aim to formulate laws of generalise results to others
Research methods used by idiographic approach
Qualitative research methods
Case studies, unstructured interviews and thematic analysis to gain depth and insight into individual behaviour
Pros of idiographic approach (case studies)
case studies provide an in-depth insight into an individual or small group, which can be used to evaluate a theory
Can be found to undermine while theories and inspire further inquiry
High ecological validity- studying real life
Cons of idiographic approach (case studies)
small sample- not generalisable
Subjective- researcher bias
Example of research with idiographic approach
Case study of Clive Wearing useful in evidencing the existence of different long term memory stores - demonstrates the usefulness of an idiographic approach and case studies in psychology
Humanism (idiographic)
uses qualitative research methods: case studies, unstructured interviews, thematic analysis
Focuses on individual and emphasise unique personal experience
Attempts to gain depth and insight into individual behaviour
Psychodynamic (combo)
attempts to make generalisable laws ( e.g. the unconscious drives our behaviour, 5 psychosexual stages)
He also considers unique psychological experiences and uses case studies (e.g. Little Hans)
Freud’s case study work contributed to psychology as it emphasised the importance of early childhood events on impacting adult behaviour (eg. Attachment and offending)
AO3- psychology as a science
P- nomothetic approach considered scientific
E- this is because it adopts a quantitative experimental method and findings from such research have the ability to predict behaviour. Whereas, the idiographic approach uses qualitative methods and therefore has been criticised for its unscientific nature, subjectivity and inability to draw general laws or predictions
E- this limits the usefulness particularly in its application and treatment of psychological disorders.
L- However supporters of the idiographic approach argue that psychologists need to understand the single individual in order to predict behaviour- its in-depth analysis increases the validity of its findings over the reliance of statistics
AO3- nomothetic approach is useful
P- nomothetic approach adopts the laws of science so it is useful in identifying trends, predicting and controlling behaviour which has useful applications
E- biological perspective adopts a biological approach when explaining the cause of disorders, such as OCD. This has led do the development of drug therapies to treat chemical imbalances, such as SSRIs.
E- however, some psychologists argue that alternate treatment such as CBT and talking therapies are more suitable as the pay adopt a more person centred approach - based on the principles of an idiographic approach
L- must consider which approach is more useful
AO3 - combination
P- idiographic and nomothetic approaches should be used in combination
E- an idiographic stance, such as a case study often prompts an idea for further research. An idiographic study explores a behaviour or phenomenon with depth and detail that will often lead to new research ideas or challenge previous theories and assumptions from nomothetic approach. This suggests that both methods have value and psychology should adopt a mixed methods approach with idiographic and nomothetic methods used to complement and challenge each other
E- can be seen in approaches such as the cognitive approach: use nomothetic approaches to draw general laws but also uses idiographic methods to explore topics such as memory in more depth
L- idiographic/nomothetic distinction could be seen as a false separation