1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
define research ethic
a set of moral principles which guide researchers to conduct and report research without deception or intention to harm the participant, or society, whether knowingly or unknowningly
when is ethics approval required
for research with:
humans
animals
collection/use of confidential information
research with other implications
what studies with human research require approval
with people
without people
use people’s data
use of tissue samples of people
what studies with animal research require ethics approval
any live non human vertebrae
fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals
what are the 6 points of the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research
honesty and integrity
respect for human participants, animals and environment
good stewardship of public resources used to conduct researc
appropriate acknowledgement of the role of others in research
responsible communication of results
an environment of responsible research
describe the Tuskegee Syphilis study
from 1932 to 1972 in tuskegee alabama, 600 low income african american males were infected with syphilis
they were monitored for 40 years, and denied effective treatment
describe the Nuremberg trials
from 1946 to 1949 in Nuremberg germany, american military tribunal opened criminial proceedings against 23 german physicians
they were on trial for unethical experimentation of prisoners of war during WWII
resulted in the creation of the nuremberg code
what are the 6 points of the nuremberg code
voluntary consent is essential
freedom from coercion
comprehension of risks and benefits
experiment to be conducted by highest qualified professionals
risk/benefit analysis essential
scientific soundness
describe the issues with thalidomide
thalidomide was approved in europe as a sedative, but was not US FDA approved
it was prescribed to pregnant women to control sleep and nausea, but resulted in severe birth defects to babies
most patients did not know it was not FDA approved, nor gave consent
what is the statement for the declaration of helsinki
the wellbeing of the human subject should take precedence over the interests of science and society
when was the helsinki declaration made and by who
in 1964 by the world medical association
what are the 6 points of the Declaration of Helsinki
consent should be in writing
respect for persons
standard of care must be available, even for control groups
limit placebo use
use caution if participant is in dependent relationship with researcher
participants must benefit from the research
what are the 12 ethical principles of research
integrity
competence
non maleficence
beneficence
autonomy
respect
responsibility
privacy
confidentiality
dignity
justice
honesty
elaborate on honesty as a principle
being honest:
with beneficiaries and respondents
about the findings and methodology
with direct and indirect stakeholders
elaborate on integrity as a principle
ensuring honesty and sincerity
fulfilling agreements and promises
do not create false expectations or promises
elaborate on competence as a prinicple
only undertaking research in areas of your expertise or where you demonstrate competency
ensure bias in all areas is avoided
elaborate on respect as a principle
includes:
autonomy - those who are capable of deliberation about their personal goals should be treated with respect for their capacity for self determination
protection of people with impaired or diminished autonomy
elaborate on responsibility as a principle
responsibility for:
planning
undertaking and publishing research within area of expertise
promote and uptake research/knowledge
no duplicate publication
elaborate on beneficience as a principle
maximise participation of the participants and minimise possible harm
elaborate on non maleficence as a principle
do no harm
minimise harms and risks
ensure privacy, autonomy and dignity
elaborate on autonomy as a principle
respect that individuals should make their own informed decision about participation
elaborate on privacy as a principle
keep the participant anonymous
do not reveal any information which is related to identity
the moral right to be left alone
elaborate on justice as a principle
obligation to distribute benefits and burdens fairly
treat equals equally
give reasons for differential treatment
elaborate on confidentiality as a principle
protecting confidential information
keep identifiable information out of the reach of others
define informed consent
that a persons knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently gives consent to participate in research
what must participants be made aware of to give informed consent
introduction and objective of research
purpose of discussion
procedure
advantages/risks
use of research
their role in research
right to refuse or withdraw
methods used to protect anonymity and confidentiality
freedom to not answer questions
who to contact for more information
what ethical issues occur before the research
benefit/harm analysis
vulnerability
selection of participants
conflict of interests
what ethical issues happen during research
informed consent
privacy and confidentiality
risk to researchers
risk to participants
what ethical issues may occur after research
sharing results
data integrity and management
integrity and publication ethics
can people under 18 give informed consent
no
the parent/guardian will sign informed consent on their behalf
what are the 5 main roles of the human research and ethics comittee
ensure research meets ethical standards
ensure research is sufficiently informed
ensure protection of participants
ensure researchers are competent
ensure informed consent documentation is appropriate
what are the 7 member roles on the HREC
chairperson
lawyer
laypersons
quantitative researcher
qualitative researcher
pastoral care profession
professional care/counselling/treatment experience
what are the 3 R’s in ethical animal research
replacement
reduction
refinement
what are the 6 governing principles of animal ethics
use animals only when justified
support the wellbeing of the animals involved
avoid and minimise harm (pain and distress)
apply high standards of scientific integrity
apply 3 R’s
know and accept one’s responsibilities
elaborate on use as a principle of animal ethics
the project must have scientific or educational merit, and potential benefits for humans, animals or the environment
elaborate on wellbeing as a principle for animal ethics
at all the times the animals environment and management must be appropriate for the species and the individual animal
procedures must be based on current best practice
elaborate on minimise harm and distress as a principle for animal ethics
death as an endpoint must be avoided unless essential for aim
assume animals feel pain the same way we do
prompt action must be taken to alleviate pain and distress
elaborate on scientific integrity as a principle for animal ethics
all methods must be valid, feasible, well designed and carefully conducted
use methods that accord with current best practice
take into consideration species-specific biology, physiology and behaviour
include strategies to minimise adverse impacts
what are the 5 types of members on an animal ethics committee
chairperson
laypersons
veterinarian
scientist
animal welfarist
what is category A in the AEC
a veterinarian
what is category B in the AEC
an animal researcher
What is category C in the AEC
someone with a demonstrated commitment to animal welfare, and not involved with the institution, animal research or the support of animal research
what is category D in the AEC
an independent person who does not fit the other categories and who is not involved with the association or animal research at any point in time
what does the AEC code state
if an AEC has more than 4 members, categories C and D should present no less than 1/3 of the members