1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Describe questionnaires
Pre-set list of written questions to which a pts responds
Cost effective, gather large amounts of data quickly, data esp with closed qs easy to analyse
Responses may not be truthful- demand characteristics and social desirability- response bias (staying neutral or reading too quick)
Describe structured interview
Live encounter with a set of pre-determined questions that are asked in a fixed order
Straightforward to replicate due to standardised format- reduces differences between interviewers
Not possible for interviewers to deviate from the topic or explain their qs- limits richness of data and unexpected info
Describe unstructured interview
Live encounter with no set questions (a certain topic will be discussed and interaction is free flowing)
More flexibility, interviewer can ask follow up points and find out unexpected info
Risk of interviewer bias, analysis of data is not straightforward
What is a semi-structured interview?
There is a list of questions which have been worked out in advance, but interviewers can also ask follow up qs based on previous answers
What is self report technique?
Any method in which a person is asked to state or explain their own feelings, opinions or experiences
What is an open question- used in questionnaires and interviews?
No fixed choice of response- produce qualitative data but contain wide range of different responses that may be difficult to analyse
What is a closed question- used in questionnaires and interviews?
Fixed choice of responses, either quantitative or qualitative data which may lack depth and detail
Likert scales: respondent indicates agreement or disagreement ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree
Rating scales: respondents identify a value that represents the strength eg 1 horror films are very entertaining or 5 not entertaining at all
Fixed choice :list of possible options and respondents indicate those that apply to them eg tick box
How to write good questions for questionnaires and interviews
Avoid jargon (terms only familiar to those within a specialised field)
Use easily understood, simple questions
Avoid using emotive language and leading questions
Reveals a researchers attitude about a topic, neutral words, leading questions guide a respondent to a particular answer
Avoid double barrelled questions and double negatives
Respondent may agree to half the q but not the other, double negative can be difficult to decipher
Why are pilot studies useful?
Researchers can test whether the proposed research is practical and achievable- determine whether ps understand qs and how long they should be given (if questionnaire)
How can you avoid interviewer bias?
Standardisation of questions- all interviewers ask same questions- interviewers expectations cannot influence the responses through phrasing of questions
How to design interviews?
List of questions interviewer intends to cover should be standardised to reduce interviewer bias
Single pt or group, interviewer take notes or record
Conducted in a quiet room, away from people
Start with neutral qs and establish rapport
Interviewees reminded of confidentiality of answers esp in sensitive, personal topics
How to improve validity in self-report
Avoid leading questions - reduces bias
Avoid double-barrelled questions - improves clarity
Clear, simple wording - prevents misunderstanding
Pilot study - identifies issues
Anonymity/confidentiality - reduces social desirability
How to increase reliability in self-report
Test-retest - reliability measured through a measure producing the same results when used on the same participants on two different occasions
Inter-rater reliability - the extent to which two or more observers record or score behaviour in the same way
Split-half reliability - type of internal consistency where the test is divided into two halves and the scores are correlated
Internal reliability - the extent to which items on a test measure the same construct (split-half method)
How would you write a scientific report?
Title
Abstract : summary of research question, method, results and conclusion
Introduction: rationale for research , aim and hypothesis
Method: design, materials, participants, procedure, timings, control
Results: mean/median, stats tests
Discussion: implications of results, limitations, suggestions for further research, improvements, practical applications
References: work of other psychologists referenced
Appendices: working for stats tests, individual data, consent form, material for replication
How to write a reference?
Name (last name then unreal of first name), date, title, place of publication, publisher
Duck, S. (1992). Human Relationships. London. Sage
What is peer review
Research is given to another expert to check for errors/validity before publication
Why is peer review important?
To check data is valid so research of low quality isn’t published
How to write a consent form?
Needs to be written as a consent form: dear, addressed to reader
Gives detail about what the investigation is
Info about ethical issues: confidentiality, right to withdraw, debrief, psych harm
At end should say: Do you consent to research?