1/31
Microevolution; Genetic Changes in Populations
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Microevolution
heritable change in the genetics of a population
Population
all the individuals of a single species that live together in the same place and time
Variation
the mechanism underlying natural selection - differences in the population
microevolution
Natural Selection
most successful portion of population (most viable offspring) → greater proportion of their genes in the next generation
changes the pattern of variation in a population from one generation to the next
Phenotypic Variation
Causes = genetic differences, environmental factors, environment-genetic combination → genetic and phenotypic variations are not perfectly correlated
differences in appearance or function that exist within populations of all organisms
Quantitative Variation, Qualitative Variation, Polymorphism
Quantitative Variation
phenotypic variation is quantified and assessed in microevolutionary studies
bell curve width = amount of variation
Qualitative Variation
phenotypic variation is qualitatively assessed in microevolutionary studies
Mendel’s work (pea plants with distinct traits)
Polymorphism
existence of discrete variants of a character among individuals in a population
variability; e.g. blood type
nearly half the gene loci in plant and animal populations are polymorphic'
coding & non-coding regions of DNA → extensive genetic variation (changes can occur here)
most protein coding genes are polymorphic in their DNA sequences → 2+ alleles
may appear within:
heterozygous individuals
between individuals in a single population, same species populations, and related species populations
Genetic Variation
2 sources of variation:
production of new alleles
small-scale mutations in DNA
large scale mutations tend to be more dangerous & unviable
rearrangement of existing alleles
larger changes in chromosome structure/number
several forms of genetic recombination
crossing over, independent assortment, random fertilization
Population Genetics
look at genetic structure → quantify what exists before seeing how it changes
genotype frequencies
Genotypic Frequencies
frequencies/percentages of individuals in a population possessing a particular genotype
genotype = 2 copies of every gene
population gene pool = sum of all gene copies at all gene loci in all individuals
Allele Frequencies
abundance of one allele relative to others in the same gene locus in the individuals of a population
diploid organism → 2 copies of each gene → allele frequency
2 alleles = p and q to represent frequencies of each allele
Frequency Problems
1000 individuals = 2000 alleles
genotype frequency = # / 1000
allele frequency = # / 2000
p = homo #1 + ½ het / total
q = homo #2 + ½ het / total
genotypic frequencies in the offspring generation (hardy weinberg)
(p+q) * (p+q) = p² + 2pq + q²
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
Null Model
an evolutionary rule of thumb that specifies the conditions under which a population of diploid organisms achieves genetic equilibrium → point where neither allele frequency nor genetic frequency will change over successive generations
how genotypic frequencies are established within sexually reproducing organisms → dominant alleles don’t replace recessive allele; genetic shuffling isn’t all that causes the gene pool to change
Null Model
defines how/when evolution does/will not occur
no control for observational data so we use null models
predict what would happen if a particular factor had no effect → theoretical reference point against which observations can be evaluated
investigated factor matches model’s prediction → factor has no effect
Genetic Equilibrium
Possible if: (microevolution will not occur - null model)
no mutations occur
the population is closed to migration from other populations
the population is infinitely large
all genotypes in the population survive and reproduce equally well
individuals in the population mate randomly with respect to genotypes
Mutations (Microevolution)
spontaneous heritable change in DNA - very rare
introduces new genetic variation into population
does not change allele frequencies quickly
unpredictable effect on fitness → most mutations in protein-coding genes lower fitness
4 types
Deleterious mutations - alter an individual’s structure, function, or behavior in harmful ways
Lethal mutations - cause great harm to organisms carrying them
Neutral mutations - neither harmful nor helpful
Advantageous mutation - some benefit on an individual that carries it
Gene Flow (Microevolution)
change in allele frequencies as individuals join a population and reproduce
introduces novel genetic variants into populations (from another population)
movement of organisms/gametes & reproduction within joined population
shifts away from Hardy-Weinberg model predictions
unpredictable effect on fitness
may introduce beneficial or harmful alleles
Evolutionary Importance of Gene Flow
degree of genetic differentiation between populations
rate of gene flow between them
Genetic Drift
random fluctuations in allele frequencies because of chance events → reduced genetic variability within populations
more pronounced within small populations (less diversity)
genotype and allele frequency differs from predicted by Hardy-Weinberg model
2 common circumstances
Population bottlenecks
Founder effects
Population Bottlenecks
rare alleles/genes in the population may not be present among surviving individuals in the case of a drastic reduction in population size → reduction in diversity
severe with endangered species (lack of variation - less resistant)
Natural Selection
shapes genetic variability (favors some traits over others) → successful traits become more common in subsequent generations
can lead to allele frequency changes in the population
phenotype is what is successful, not the allele
individuals that survive and reproduce → favorable and unfavorable alleles passed to next generation
reproductive success → relative fitness
Relative Fitness
number of surviving offspring that an individual produces compared with the number left by others in the population
3 Modes (Natural Selection)
Directional Selection → phenotype moves towards either end favored by natural selection
Stabilizing Selection → favors the mean phenotype over extremes
Disruptive Selection → favors the extreme phenotypes over the mean
Non-Random Mating
sexual selection
unequal parental investment - evolution of showy structures or elaborate courtship behavior is favored
intersexual selection (mate choice) vs intrasexual selection (competition)
causes sexual dimorphism
inbreeding → genetically related individuals mate with each other
increased frequency of homozygous genotypes
decreased frequency of heterozygous genotypes
increased expression of recessive phenotypes
Sexual Dimorphism
distinct physical/behavioral differences between sexes
similar process to directional selection (one extreme has advantage)
can influence genotype frequencies
caused by sexual selection
Diploid Condition
heterozygotes - “hide” the recessive allele
reduced effectiveness of natural selection removing harmful recessive alleles
natural selection works on phenotype → recessive alleles cannot be seen in heterozygotes
Balanced Polymorphism
maintenance of 2+ phenotypes in fairly stable proportions over many generations
Natural selection preserves balanced polymorphism when:
heterozygotes have higher relative fitness
different alleles are favored in different environments
rarity of a phenotype provides a selective advantage
Heterozygote Advantage
heterozygotes have higher relative fitness than either homozygote
crosses between two homozygous strains that exhibit a robustness → hybrid vigor
e.g. sickle cell disease
Environments
selection varies in environments
genetic variability can also be maintained within a population when different alleles are favored in different places or at different times
Frequency-Dependent Selection
rare phenotypes have a selective advantage because they are rare
increases in frequency until it loses that advantage
altruistic (A) vs selfish (S) example
many A → a few S thrive
many S → all out for themselves → S don’t thrive
common allele → fitness drops; rare allele → fitness rises; cycle
Neutral Variation Hypothesis
some variation at gene loci coding for enzymes and other soluble proteins → neither favored nor eliminated by natural selection (selectively neutral)
e.g. alleles → diff AA → all different forms of the proteins still function equally well → no allele favored
cannot assume every genetic variant that exists has been preserved by natural selection → hard to test (fitness effects are very subtle)
Adaptation/Evolutionary Constraints
environments change over time → no organism can be perfectly adapted to its environment
selection preserves alleles successful under prevailing conditions → adapted to conditions that parents lived under
adaptation has a “time lag”
acts on new mutations (rare) and existing genetic variation
works mostly with alleles present for many generations or small modifications of existing structures