1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
churches (Weber and Troeltsch)
bureaucratic hierarchy of professionals
claims monopoly on religious truth
accepts wider society
tries to appeal to all
ideologically conservative
linked to state
eg. CofE
Bruce- view of religious monopoly only applies to catholic church before the 16th century protestant reformation
denomination (Niebuhr)
halfway between sects and churches
don’t appeal to all
accept society’s values
aren’t linked to state
tolerant of other religions
don’t claim monopoly of truth
eg. Methodism
cults
individualistic and loose knit
small grouping around shared interests
defined and exclusive belief system
tolerant of others
world affirming- claim to improve this life
eg. Peoples Temple/Jim Jones
sects
small and exclusive
hostile to wider society
high level of commitment
members from poor and oppressed
charismatic leader
Wallis- characteristics
churches and denominations are viewed as legitimate & claim their interpretation of faith is the only legitimate one
sects and churches are viewed as deviant & accept there are many interpretations
sects and churches are in conflict with wider society (Stark and Bainbridge)
Wallis NRMs
believed new categories were needed post 1960s
world accommodating- breaks away from existing churches, doesn’t accept or reject world, religious matters, want to restore purity to faith, members live normal lives eg. Pentecostalism
world rejecting- similar to sects, critical of outside world, members must break from old life, live communally and movement controls life eg. West Borough Baptist
world affirming- unlike other religious groups, don’t have collective worship, not organised, limited contact, offer access to spiritual or supernatural powers eg. Scientology
Wallis found NRMs rarely fit into his categories
Stark and Bainbridge- religious organisations should be distinguished by tension or conflict between the group and wider society