1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Proposed solutions to the English Question
English Parliament
"English Votes for English Laws" at Westminster
Elected regional assemblies
What would an English Parliament do?
England is the only part of UK not to have own devolved parliament
Eng Parl would have legislative powers over domestic Eng issues
English exec / gov could also be created to implement policy
Little support for Eng parl within major political parties but is favoured by UKIP
could sit in Westminster or outside lodon
Arguments FOR English Parliament
Would complete devolution within UK + resolve "English Question"
Would create more coherent system of devolution, with federal UK Parl + gov responsible for UK-wide issues, rather than combined with English issues
Would give political + institutional expression to English identity and interests
Arguments AGAINST English Parliament
Would create additional layer of gov - create tensions between UK gov + English parl
"Devolution all round" wouldn't create coherent + equitable system because England= much bigger than other UK nations
Only limited support in Englandfor English parliament
what is the West Lothian Q?
Why should Scottish MPs be able to vote on English matters at Westminster when English MPs cannot vote on matters devolved to the Scottish parliamen?
proposed by Tom Dalyell, MP for West Lothian in 1970
"English Votes for English Laws" at Westminster
MPs no longer make laws on devolved matters
West Lothian Question: why Scottish MPs can vote on England matters when English MPs can't vote on Scot Parliament matters?
2003-4: legislation on uni tuition fees in Eng wouldn't have passed without votes from Scot Labour MPs - argued that changes to public spending in Eng would affect Scot spending
Tories have argued for EVEL since devolution - would intro special procedures in HoC for dealing with legislation that affects only England
what would EVEL introduce?
in Oct 2015, MPs voted to introduce a ‘double veto’
Bills certified by the speaker as England-only are considered in a Legislative Grand Committee
additional stage of legislative process where English MPs can veto them
problems with EVEL
would create 2 classes of MPs
decisions like made on public spending in England may still affect funding in the rest of the UK
would make it more difficult for govt with small maj to deliver manifesto commitments
only 6/19 govts since 1945 have had enough MPs from England to give them an overall parl maj
McKay Commission
Established by Tory-Lib Dem coalition
2013: recommended that parliamentary procedures be adapted so that majority of English MPs is needed to pass legislation affecting only England
Oct 2015
MPs voted to intro EVEL. Bills certified by speaker as England -only considered in additional legislative stage where English MPs can veto them.
Will still require maj support in HoC + devolved MPs can vote on them
Jan 2016:
new procedures used for 1st time for parts of Housing and Planning Bill
EVEL opponents claim that it creates diff classes of MPs + would make it more diff for gov with small parl maj to deliver manifesto commitments
Elected regional assemblies
Blair gov planned to create directly elected assemblies
Plans scrapped after 78% of voters were "no" in 2004 referendum
Arguments FOR elected regional assemblies
Would bring decision making closer to the people + address differing interests of Eng regions
Would create more balanced devolution settlement within UK because Eng is too large to have its own parliament
Would enhance democracy as regional assemblies would take over functions of unelected quango (an NGO)
Certain areas (Cornwall, Yorkshire) have strong sense of regional identitY
Regional assemblies could be catalyst for econ + cultural regeneration
Arguments AGAINST elected regional assemblies
Few areas of Eng have strong sense of regional identity
Would break up Eng + fail to provide expression for English interests
Would cause tensions between regional + local gov
Regional assemblies dominated by urban rather than rural interests
Little public support for creating regional layer of gov in Eng
Local government in England
Local authorities = lowest gov level in UK.
The Only elected branch below central gov in England
Greater London Authority has responsibility for econ development - consists of directly elected mayor + London Assembly.
Mayor sets budget + determines policy for authority.
Current London Mayor is Labour's Sadiq Khan
2016: only 16 local authorities outside London had directly elected mayors
Local authorities responsible for day-to-day services - eg. education ,housing, social services, road and tranport
LAs organise + regulate provision via housing associations + academy schools
what are combined authorities
consists of adjoining local councils
granted additional funcing and policy making powers such as transports, health, economic devel, policing but do not have law making powers
e.g. Greater Manny combined authority was created in 2011 and a further 10 agreed by 2016
struture of local govt in 2016
55 unitary authorities
27 county councils
201 district councils
36 metropolitan borughs
How has devolution created a new relationship between UK nations?
Provided institutional recognition of distinctiveness of these nations while reflecting their membership of Union
Impact of devolution on UK politics
Quasi-federal UK
Policy divergence
Funding
Britishness
Impact of devolution on UK politics - quasi-federal UK
UK is quasi-federal state :
Limited parliamentary sovereignty:
Westminster legally sovereign as it can overrule / abolish devolved bodies
In practice, no longer sovereign over domestic matters in devolved regions
2016 Scotland Act established that Westminster can't legislate on devolved matters without consent
SA constrains parliamentary sovereignty by saying that devolution can only be overturned via referendum - popular sovereignty
Quasi-federal parliament:
Westminster operates as Eng parliament - makes domestic law in Eng but is federal parl for devolved regions because it retains reserved powers on UK-wide issues
Joint Ministerial Committee: UK ministers + devolved counterparts meet to consider non-devolved matters + resolve disputes
Supreme Court: resolves disputes over competences by determining if devolved bodies acted within their powers
What does Quasi-federal mean?
the central government of a unitary state devolved some of its powers to sub-national govt
has some features of a unitary state and some of a federal state
Should the UK become a federal state? - YES
Would provide coherent constitutional settlement for UK + its nations, establishing clearer relationship between UK gov + devolved govts of England, Scotland ,Wales and ni
Establishing federal state would resolve some anomalies (Eg. West Lothian Q) that have arisen under current devolution approach
Creating English parl + gov as part of federal UK would answer "English Question"
Status of Westminster would be clarified - federal parl dealing with issues such as border control, defence and foreign affaris
Lords could be reformed
chamber representing devolved nations or abolished
Should the UK become a federal state? - NO
Federalism works best in states with no dominant nation unsuitable for UK as England is much bigger
English Parl would rival Westminster Parl
especially if diff parties were in gov in Eng + UK
English MPs could still be a maj at Westminster
Measures to reduce dominance of Eng would be problematic + unpopular
Disputes over funding would occur
Little public support for federal UK - devolution is preferred constitutional choice for devolved voters
Impact of devolution on UK politics - policy divergence
- Devolved govs have introduced policies which differ from Eng
- Scot Parl's power on tax raise prospect of further divergence
- Policy diffs can be good - devolved institutions respond to electorate's concerns
- BUT divergence may undermine principle of equal rights for UK citizens - eg. Eng is only part of UK to have prescription charges
Impact of devolution on UK politics - funding
Devolved administrations funded by block grants from UK Treasury
Barnett formula translates changes in public spending in Eng into equivalent changes in block grants for devolved nations
Scot, Wales + NI receive more public spending per head of pop than Eng
Critics say that this is Eng subsidy of rest of UK BUT Scot + Wales have tight public spending - Barnett formula doesn't take into account relative needs (eg. living standards)
Impact of devolution on UK politics - Britishness
Umbrella identity that provides common bond between UK while maintaining distinctive national identities
Devolution increased no of people identify as Scot / Welsh / Eng
Has devolution undermined the Union? - YES
Piecemeal approach to devolution has meant that problems (eg. West Lothian Q) haven't been addressed
Insufficient attention to benefits of Union in post-devolution U
Rules on policy coordination + dispute resolution aren't clear enough
Policy divergence undermined common welfare rights in UK
SNP is dominant party in Scot - support for Scot independence increased
Devolution settlement seen as unfair
Has devolution undermined the Union? - NO
Devolution answered Scot / Welsh / NI demands for greater autonomy - decision making brought closer to the people
Devolution proceeded relatively smoothly - no major disputes between UK gov + devolved bodies
Policy divergence reflects diff interests of UK nations - successful initiatives in 1 nation can be copied
Preferred constitutional position for voters in Scot / Wales / NI
Delivered peace + power sharing in NI after 30 years of instability
Why did 2016 Brexit referendum cause further problems about devolution?
Maj of voters in Scot + NI voted "remain"
Maj of voters in Eng + Wales voted "leave"
Then-leader of SNP Sturgeon argued that Scot shouldn't be forced out of EU against its will. Called for 2nd referendum on Scot independence