Intoxication

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/8

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 4:37 PM on 5/19/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

9 Terms

1
New cards

Intoxication

A defendants mental state being affected by alcohol, drugs. or other substances.

2
New cards

Voluntary Intoxication

  • Where the defendant willingly consumes the substance

  • If the offence requires specific intent (e.g. theft murder) intoxication may be a defence if it prevents forming intent

  • No defence for basic intent crimes (e.g. assault) - the law assumes recklessness in becoming intoxicated.

3
New cards

Involuntary Intoxication

Occurs when the defendant is unaware they are consuming an intoxicating substance (e.g. spiked drinks)

If intoxication prevents the formation of mens rea, it may be a defence to both specific and basic intent offences

4
New cards

R v Sheehan and Moore

Drunken intent is still intent

5
New cards

R v Majewski

Voluntary intoxication is no defence to basic intent crimes, as the reckless act of becoming intoxicated satisfies the mens rea element

6
New cards

R v Lipman

Voluntary intoxication can reduce specific intent crimes down to their basic intent counterparts (murder to manslaughter)

7
New cards

A-G for Northern Ireland v Gallagher

Voluntary intoxication will not reduce a specific intent crime conviction if the defendant forms the intention before they are intoxicated.

8
New cards

R v Hardie

Voluntary consumption of a non-dangerous, sedative drug can negate the mens rea of crimes of basic intent if hte substance has an unexpected, paradoxical effect

9
New cards

R v Kingston

Involuntary intoxication is not a defence if the defendant still formed the intent to commit a crime, lack of self induced intoxication does not excuse criminal behaviour when intent is present.