Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Lotka-Volterra
equations are variations of the logistic growth equation that can be used to estimate the equilibrium population sizes for two competing species
Phase planes
isocline identify the location os stability within populations
combining bother isocline together shows the phase plane
If resources are unlimited, populations growth exponentially and competition does not occur
When resources are limited, similar organism compete for those resources
Resource limiting results in competition
Sometimes competition is difficult to detect
Interactions with another species restrict where a population can persist
Fundamental niche
Set of environmental conditions under which it can survive and reproduce
Realized niche
Portion of a species’ fundamental niche in which it is actually found
Competitive exclusion principle
No two species can coexist in exactly the same ecological niche. One is expected to win the competition
Direct effect
Produces when an individual or species directly impacts another without the interaction being mediated by or transmitted through a third party
Predation, fighting
Indirect effect
When an interaction between two individuals or species is mediated by a third part or by another agent, such as a resource
Predation affecting herbivore abundance
Resource competition/exploitation competition
Individuals compete indirectly by consuming a shared resource
Indirect effect
Self-Thinning
A decline in population density resulting from intraspecific competition
Shrubs
Interference competition
When competing individuals directly interact in an attempt to reduce the other’s access to resources
Fighting over food, water, space, mates
Allelopathy
Releasing toxins to affect competition
Black walnut
Territoriality
The establishment of an area by one or more organisms from which others are at least partly excluded
Aggressive, animals only
Pissing on stuff
Preemption
When an individual prevents other individuals from occupying a location by occupying the space first
Barnacles, plants
Direct effect
Intraspecific compeititon fast facts
Strength of intra factors strongly into a population’s change in size
As a population grows, intra reduces the BR and increase the DR
Actually population growth rate drops below the maximum
Individuals grow slower in high density populations, they also die faster
Individuals in lower density populations are more likely to grow and reproduce
Carrying capacity
Limiting resource can be space, chemical nutrients, sunlight
A smaller K means the density at which individuals begin to experience the effects of intra is reduced
Logistic growth
Competition is limiting further growth at K
Twice the maximum growth rate will result in the population growing more rapidly
Competition coefficient
Represent the per capita effect on the growth of one species of another species.
Quantify the relative competitive strengths of different verses same species competitors
Effect of species one on species 2: a12
If a is 0, there is no displacement, no effect
Lotka-Volterra
Used to predict which species should “win” a competitive interaction
If the two isocline do not intersect, coexistence is not possible and the species whose isocline lies farthest from the origin will eliminate the other from the system
If the winner of the competition between two species depends on their initial population sizes, interspecific competition is stronger than intraspecific competition
Phase plane
Plots the population sizes of both species against each other to help visualize these predictions
At eq, all feature points are plotted on top of each other
Steady state point
No change in population size over time
Globally stable if it does not depend on initial population size
When intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition
Phase portrait
Stupid ass lines
How to experiment
Identify places where two species seem to compete, remove one of them, examine what happens to the other
Meta-analysis
A statistical technique that can be used to combine data from multiple studies to identify trends
Gurevitch
Evaluate how changing the density of a competitor impacts biomass
In most cases, competition had a large effect on the biomass of each species
Common garden experiments
Explore whether an observed pattern is due to environmental effects or interaction between species
Grow both species under same conditions within the same garden, it becomes clear how much of an observed pattern is due to the environment and how much must be due to something else
Hypothesis for competitive coexistence
Environmental factors can shift the competitive interaction so it favors one species under certain conditions and another species under different conditions
Environmental variation in space or time can lead to coexistence
Spatial variation
Describe differences that result from observations made in different locations, but at the same time
Temporal variation
Describe differences in observations that are made at the same location, but at different points in time
Trade-offs
Two competing species may evolve in ways that reduce the strength of competition between them through opposing shifts along some trade-off
Character displacement
When two species compete, natural selection may reduce the strength of competition by changing some characteristics of one for both species
occur when niche overlap
Species can coexist if there was a trade-off in competitive ability vs. colonization ability
Adaptations that increase how efficiently a species can reach and disperse in a newly opened area may decrease that species’ ability to compete
As long as the system is periodically disturbed, competition vs. colonization can promote coexistence
Competition can be made weak due to predation or other ecological interactions
Predation reduces population sizes for multiple competition species, then resources might never become limiting