pubhlth 244 - week 7: dissemination & implementation science

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/26

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

27 Terms

1
New cards

implementation from the outset

  • pre-intervention

    • is there a relationship?

  • efficacy studies

    • could a program work?

  • effectiveness studies

    • does this program work?

  • implementation studies

    • what makes the program work in practice settings?

2
New cards

DI science

  • EBI

  • Dissemination

  • Implementation

3
New cards

DI

seeks to understand how to increase the adoption, implementation, & continued use of health-enhancing evidence-based interventions

4
New cards

EBIs

  • programs

  • practices

  • policies

  • treatment

5
New cards

dissemination

involves efforts to reach audiences & stakeholders about Eis & strategies to facilitate their adoption

6
New cards

implementation

focuses on planned efforts to support adoption and integration of EBIs into routine practice in community, clinical & public health settings

7
New cards

where to find EBIs?

  • community guide

    • evidence-based recommendations & findings from the community preventative services task force

8
New cards

dissemination activities

  • designing for dissemination focuses on identifying interested audiences and sharing the EBIs

    • design EBI product + plan for communication, packaging, & distribution

    • identify & engage key audiences who will adopt & sustain EBI

9
New cards

implementation activities

  • designing for implementation requires more steps to focus on strategies for effectively implementing in diverse settings

    • engage stakeholders

    • understand problem & set goals

    • find & select EBI

    • adapt EBI

    • implement EBI

    • evaluate EBI

10
New cards

why do some initiatives go “viral”?

  • “tipping point” of almost anything can be broken down into 3 things

    • people: connectors, mavens, & salespeople

    • innovation: “stickiness”

    • context: info to get ppl to adopt the innovation so that it “tips” & speads like wildfire

11
New cards

diffusion of innovation for dissemination

  • how do you get something to be adopted

12
New cards

s-shaped diffusion curve (“spreading”)

  • adpotion of an innovation in a population follows an S-shared curve

    • at first, low % of pop does the behavior

    • as time passes, “infection” starts happening & many more ppl do the behavior

13
New cards

element #1: the innovation (“stickiness”)

  • innovations can be an idea, practice, or object

  • must be perceived as “new” or “novel”

  • should ideally be in line w/ the cultural beliefs & practices of a pop

14
New cards

element #2: communication channels

  • 2 distinct communication channels:

  • media

  • interpersonal

15
New cards

communication channel: media

formal channel (i.e., television, radio, internet, print media)

16
New cards

communication channel: interpersonal

  • informal channel (i.e., people)

    • w/ informal communication channels, the concept of homophily (“birds of a feather flock together”) is critical

    • homophily means that any 2 people are very similar in their views, perception, & beliefs within their larger social system

17
New cards

element #3: time

  • to understand how diffusion occurs over time it is useful to consider the innovation-decision process

  • how quickly, or slowly, people progress through this process is a critical determinant of the rate of diffusion or the time i takes for the innovation to be adopted

    • knowledge

    • persuasion

    • decicion

    • implementation

    • confirmation

18
New cards

element #4: social system (“context”)

  • social system:

    • is characterized by norms that define the social structures

    • set boundaries for diffusion & the communication structures spread info about the innovation

    • formal structures

    • informal structures

19
New cards

s-curve influence by type of adopters

  • innovators (2.5%)

  • early adopters (13.5%)

  • early majority (34%)

  • late majority (34%)

  • laggards (16%)

20
New cards

innovators

  • 2.5%

  • the “spark” igniting a chain of adoption

  • accept risk

  • depart from social norms & try new things

  • well-respected by their peers then their adoption may become “contagious”

21
New cards

early adopters

  • 13.5%

  • hold central positions within their communication structures

  • generally well respected & even admired by others in their social system

  • many early adopters are opinion leaders whose opinions & behavior can start the tipping/diffusion effect

22
New cards

early majority

  • 34%

  • take relatively longer period of time to pass through the innovation-decision process compared to innovators & early adopters

  • more carefully consider the advantages & disadvantages

  • large group, so once they adopt then things start spreading like “wildfire”

23
New cards

late majority

  • 34%

  • comprises people who may require a longer time to pass through the innovation-decision process

  • often reluctant to adopt the innovation, and tend have less access to a variety of information sources

  • relatively homogeneous social networks

  • typically skeptical about change

24
New cards

laggards

  • 16%

  • represent the last category of potential adopters

  • tend to be extremely traditional

  • have faw ties to the key opinion leaders of a social system

  • may have very limited access to information

  • slowest to accept change

  • may never adopt the innovation

25
New cards

consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)

determination of the characteristics we look for in a potential adoption

26
New cards

rapid growing field

  • need for validated measures (e.g., outer and inner settings)

  • need to promote consistent use of comparable measures

  • must incentivize and support academics to partner with real-world stakeholders from a range of community settings

  • need to understand what promotes “de-implementation” of inappropriate, costly, and/or harmful practices

  • increasing potential of policy implementation research

27
New cards

re-aim framework

  • reach

  • effectiveness

  • adoption

  • implementation

  • maintenance