1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
implementation from the outset
pre-intervention
is there a relationship?
efficacy studies
could a program work?
effectiveness studies
does this program work?
implementation studies
what makes the program work in practice settings?
DI science
EBI
Dissemination
Implementation
DI
seeks to understand how to increase the adoption, implementation, & continued use of health-enhancing evidence-based interventions
EBIs
programs
practices
policies
treatment
dissemination
involves efforts to reach audiences & stakeholders about Eis & strategies to facilitate their adoption
implementation
focuses on planned efforts to support adoption and integration of EBIs into routine practice in community, clinical & public health settings
where to find EBIs?
community guide
evidence-based recommendations & findings from the community preventative services task force
dissemination activities
designing for dissemination focuses on identifying interested audiences and sharing the EBIs
design EBI product + plan for communication, packaging, & distribution
identify & engage key audiences who will adopt & sustain EBI
implementation activities
designing for implementation requires more steps to focus on strategies for effectively implementing in diverse settings
engage stakeholders
understand problem & set goals
find & select EBI
adapt EBI
implement EBI
evaluate EBI
why do some initiatives go “viral”?
“tipping point” of almost anything can be broken down into 3 things
people: connectors, mavens, & salespeople
innovation: “stickiness”
context: info to get ppl to adopt the innovation so that it “tips” & speads like wildfire
diffusion of innovation for dissemination
how do you get something to be adopted
s-shaped diffusion curve (“spreading”)
adpotion of an innovation in a population follows an S-shared curve
at first, low % of pop does the behavior
as time passes, “infection” starts happening & many more ppl do the behavior
element #1: the innovation (“stickiness”)
innovations can be an idea, practice, or object
must be perceived as “new” or “novel”
should ideally be in line w/ the cultural beliefs & practices of a pop
element #2: communication channels
2 distinct communication channels:
media
interpersonal
communication channel: media
formal channel (i.e., television, radio, internet, print media)
communication channel: interpersonal
informal channel (i.e., people)
w/ informal communication channels, the concept of homophily (“birds of a feather flock together”) is critical
homophily means that any 2 people are very similar in their views, perception, & beliefs within their larger social system
element #3: time
to understand how diffusion occurs over time it is useful to consider the innovation-decision process
how quickly, or slowly, people progress through this process is a critical determinant of the rate of diffusion or the time i takes for the innovation to be adopted
knowledge
persuasion
decicion
implementation
confirmation
element #4: social system (“context”)
social system:
is characterized by norms that define the social structures
set boundaries for diffusion & the communication structures spread info about the innovation
formal structures
informal structures
s-curve influence by type of adopters
innovators (2.5%)
early adopters (13.5%)
early majority (34%)
late majority (34%)
laggards (16%)
innovators
2.5%
the “spark” igniting a chain of adoption
accept risk
depart from social norms & try new things
well-respected by their peers then their adoption may become “contagious”
early adopters
13.5%
hold central positions within their communication structures
generally well respected & even admired by others in their social system
many early adopters are opinion leaders whose opinions & behavior can start the tipping/diffusion effect
early majority
34%
take relatively longer period of time to pass through the innovation-decision process compared to innovators & early adopters
more carefully consider the advantages & disadvantages
large group, so once they adopt then things start spreading like “wildfire”
late majority
34%
comprises people who may require a longer time to pass through the innovation-decision process
often reluctant to adopt the innovation, and tend have less access to a variety of information sources
relatively homogeneous social networks
typically skeptical about change
laggards
16%
represent the last category of potential adopters
tend to be extremely traditional
have faw ties to the key opinion leaders of a social system
may have very limited access to information
slowest to accept change
may never adopt the innovation
consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)
determination of the characteristics we look for in a potential adoption
rapid growing field
need for validated measures (e.g., outer and inner settings)
need to promote consistent use of comparable measures
must incentivize and support academics to partner with real-world stakeholders from a range of community settings
need to understand what promotes “de-implementation” of inappropriate, costly, and/or harmful practices
increasing potential of policy implementation research
re-aim framework
reach
effectiveness
adoption
implementation
maintenance