Tectonic disaster trends since 1960 and research into the accuracy of data

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
New
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/3

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

4 Terms

1
New cards

Frequency of seismic and volcanic processes

  • seismic and volcanic processes cannot be prevented

  • Risk seems to be increased and human factors as the occurrence of tectonic hazards do not show significant increase

  • Hydrological and meteorological hazards have increased slightly and occur most

2
New cards

overall patterns since the 1960s

  • total number of recorded hazards has increased

  • Number of disasters are significantly and peaked in the early 2000s, which seems to be an anomaly

  • Number of deaths have decreased overall apart from mega disaster spikes

  • The number of people affected is increasing some hazards

  • Economic costs have all significantly increased for all

3
New cards

why do we use rolling means?

as nature fluctuates

4
New cards

how good are disaster statistics

  • there is not an agreed-upon definition or a numerical threshold for disasters

  • It depends if only direct deaths were counted or secondary ones were counted too

  • Local/regional events are often under recorded

  • Reporting of deaths can be politically biased, e.g. to protect the tourism industry

  • Statistics are difficult to collect in rural areas are areas of low development and densely populated settlements

  • Time trend and analysis is difficult as type of collection has changed and can be skewed by mega disasters