1/92
microeconomics
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Explicit Cost
cost that involves monetary payments to acquire goods or services; we actually paid this cost
ex. paying $2 for a coffee
Implicit Cost
cost that doesn’t involve monetary payments; ‘opportunity cost’
ex. losing 15 by waiting in a drive-thru “lost earning, which could have been earned if you worked the 15 minutes”
Total cost in accounting
explict cost (‘reciepts’), no implict cost
ex. $2
Total cost in economics
explicit cost + implict cost
ex. $2 (explict) + $10 (implicit) = $12
Comparison of economics/accounting cost/profit
Sunk/’dead’ cost
cost that once incurred (happens), it cannot be recovered
ex. paint on a car (can’t restore it)
since you cannot recover this cost, they become irrelevant and we should ignore it in making future decisions (don’t let it affect your decisions)
Production
how much ‘output of production’ we could have depends on how much inputs are available
for simplicity, we will assume we only have 2 inputs (labour (L), and capital (K))
Marginal production formula (on formula sheet)
Production/inputs in the short run
capital is fixed (b/c changing capital takes time, not easily changed), but labour is variable
Short run production has three stages
First stage: increasing returns, second stage: diminishing returns, third stage: negative returns.
Law of diminishing/decreasing marginal productivity/returns
MP of the variable input/’labour’ will eventually diminish/’decrease’ as we hire more of that variable (labour) input beside a fixed amount of the otther input (capital)
What causes MPL to ‘shift up’/increase
capital “K” increases ex. bigger land
technology increases
(the opposite would cause a decrease)
Costs in the short run
refers to all costs that vary with production output, including fixed and variable costs
Why is the cost (MC) curve a ‘u shape?
because it is a reflection of the productivity (MP) curve (n shape)
law of diminishing returns is responsible for the shapes of these curves
T or F; when AVC is falling, MC is also falling
false; when AVC is falling MC is rising for part of it
T or F; when MC is falling, AVC is also falling
true
Shifts in the short-run cost curves
if..
Pinputs decrease ex. raw materials
Taxes (on producers) decreases
Less regulations (b/c regualtions increase cost of production)
Technology increases (production is more efficient)
all of these will cause the cost of production to decrease, supply increases
MC, AVC, ATC all decrease (all shift down)
and vice versa
the opposite is also true
Pinput increases
Taxes increases
more regulations
technology decreases
all of these cause the cost of production to increase, supply decreases
MC, AVC, ATC all increase (all shift up)
Production/inputs in the long run
all inputs (labour and capital) are variable (since you have plenty of time to change capital)
Costs in the long run
no longer have anything fixed
in the long run, all inputs (L and K) are variable (capital is now variable as well (lots of time to change it)). In this cause, the producer will use the combination of inputs that produces what it wants with the lowest cost
the firms will be producing with the lowest cost b/c capital can be adjusted!
Example of LATC
Long-run in comparison to short-run
In economics, the long-run refers to a period in which all factors of production and costs are variable, allowing firms to adjust all inputs. In contrast, the short-run is characterized by at least one fixed input, limiting the firm's ability to change production levels.
LATC (long-run average total cost)
shows the lowest cost of producing ouput level; it is the lower envelope/carrier of all shortrun total cost curves
(‘enjoying’) Economies of scale
increased return to scale; as Q increases “scale/size of production” = LATC decreases; bigger scale = decreased cost (cost of savings from bigger scale of production)
Diseconomies of scale
decreased return to scale; as Q increases “scale/size of production” = LATC increases; bigger scale = increased cost (no cost of savings from bigger scale of production)
Efficient Scale
constant return to scale; it is the output range at which LATC is at/reaches its minimum
2 types of efficient scales
range
spans at the lowest LATC; minimum efficient scale and optimal/maximum efficient scale
2 types of efficient scale
single point
is a single quantity at the lowest LATC
Different market structures
perfect competition
monoply
monopolistic competetion
Characteristics of Perfect Competetition
large number of sellers and buyers (very many firms)
sellers sell identical ‘homogenous’ products
no single seller controls the price - it is the whole market (D and S) that determines the price and once the market determines the price, each seller has to accept/take it. Sellers are price takers
zero monopoly power
free entry and exit; ‘no barriers to entry’
any producer can enter the market or exit/’leave’ freely and no one can prevent him
monopolists try to protect their monopoly by putting barriers
Market
determines the price; price maker
Firm
is a price taker
firm is forced to charge/sell at the market price (price taker)
can sell what you want but can’t charge more than what is set
Demand curve
for a market ‘industry’ = negatively sloped
for a firm = perfectly elastic (horizontal)
Profit formula
= total revenue (TR) - total cost (TC; economic cost= implict cost + explict cost)
Scenarios
profit
TR > TC
P (revenue per unit) > ATC (cost per unit)
breakeven
‘normal profit’
TR = TC
P = ATC
economic profit = 0
accounting profit = +
loss
TR < TC
P < ATC
Objective of any producer…
maximize his profits
trying to produce the best quantity that maximizes your profits or, if you’re suffering from a loss, the quantity will minimize your loss
profit = TR - TV
Objective of any consumer…
maximize utility/satisfaction
Profit maximization using MR and MC (2 conditions must be satisified)
MR = MC (necessary condition)
MC is rising (sufficial condition)
Short-run Equilibrium of a perfectly competitive firm… case 1: abnormal profit
occurs when price is greater than average total cost, leading to maximum profit in the short run
Short-run Equilibrium of a perfectly competitive firm… case 2: breakeven aka normal profit
occurs when price equals average total cost, resulting in no economic profit or loss
Short-run Equilibrium of a perfectly competitive firm… loss: 3 cases
loss and continue: TR > TVC, P > AVC “covers costs”
loss and indifferent: TR = TVC, P = AVC “just covers costs”
loss and shutdow: TR < TVC, P < AVC “didn’t cover costs”
Short-run Equilibrium of a perfectly competitive firm… loss: case 1: loss and continue
*short run only!
The firm continues to operate even though it is incurring a loss, as total revenue covers variable costs and contributes to fixed costs.
Short-run Equilibrium of a perfectly competitive firm… loss: case 2: loss and indifferent
*short run only!
The firm operates at a loss without incentive to exit the market, as total revenue just covers variable costs.
Short-run Equilibrium of a perfectly competitive firm… loss: case 3: loss and shutdown
*short run only!
The firm decides to exit the market as total revenue does not cover variable costs, resulting in losses.
Summary of all cases
Shutdown price
is the minimum of the average variable price (AVC); if the price goes below it, the firm will shut down indicating it cannot cover variable costs
Short-run supply curve of a perfectly competitive firm
the supply curve of a perfectly competitive firm is the rising part of the MC curve above the minimum AVC
Long-run Equilibrium of a perfectly competitive firm
in the long-run, the perfectly competitive firm will be ‘breaking even’ (normal profit) because of the free entry and exit
suppose there is a profit, the market is effective and new firms enter the market. They contine to enter as long as there is a profit in the industry (attractive). They continue to enter, more seller, so supply increases and price decreases until profit disappears.
if there is a loss, firms start to leave until the loss disappears
in long-run equilibrium, a perfectly competitive firm will achieve both productive (produce with the lowest ATC) and allocative (P=MC) efficiency
A perfectly competitive firm could have…
long-run (1 case)
breakeven (due to free entry and exit)
short-run (5 cases)
abnormal profit
breakeven
loss
loss and continue
loss and indifferent
loss and shutdown
Is a perfect competition economically efficient?
yes! it is the most efficient market style
We have two types of efficiency…
productive efficiency
allocative efficiency
Productive Efficiency
to produce with the lowest ATC
Utilize resources optimally
Allocative Efficiency
P = MC
This occurs when resources are distributed in a way that maximizes total welfare, ensuring that the price consumers are willing to pay equals the marginal cost of production.
“Free” competitive market
no intervention from the government
where prices are determined solely by supply and demand, leading to optimal resource allocation.
Competitive quantity
maximizes total surplus/welfare
but at any other quantity other than the competitive equilibrium quantity, it willgive us less total surplus, there will be DWL (dead weight loss)
Market Structures
Characteristics of Monopoly
monopolies are bad!
1 single seller “price maker” (faces the whole market demand)
product has no close substitutes (homogenous)
great barriers to entry
legal- copyright, patent, etc.
technical (you are the only one who knows the secret of doing the job)
since the monopolist is the only seller in the market the demand for his good is the demand of the whole market
Demand of Monopoly
negatively sloped
to sell more, the monopolist must lower the price to encourage sales
Total revenue (TR) is maximized when…
MR = 0 (no more extra revenue)
Profit is maximized when…
MR = MC
and MC is rising
Supply ‘curve’ of a monopolist vs perfect competition…
monopolist does not have a supply curve, like perfect competition; he has a supply point because the monopolist sets the price based on demand
the supply point is the point on his demand curve above the intersection of MR and MC
Monopoly… case 1: abnormal profit
occurs when a monopolist sets prices above marginal cost, leading to higher profits than in competitive markets
Monopoly… case 2: breakeven “normal profit”
occurs when a monopolist sets prices equal to marginal cost, resulting in no economic profit but covering all costs
Monopoly… case 3: loss
occurs when a monopolist sets prices below average total cost, leading to economic losses despite generating some revenue
Monopoly power
the ability to charge a price higher than MC
= P - MC (measures the ability of a firm to charge a price higher than MC)
perfect competition has no monopoly power, P = MC
Monopoly is bad because…
a monopolist produces a smaller Q and charges a higher price compared to perfect competition
P ≠ MC, monpolist doesn’t achieve allocative efficiency
monopolist doesn’t produce with the lowest ATC, monopolist doesn’t achieve productive efficiency
monopolist creates welfare loss (DWL)
Since monopoly is so bad, how do we prevent it?
Anti-combine'/’trust’ laws
Government regulations
marginal cost pricing
average cost pricing
Anti-combine'/’trust’ laws
laws that prohibit monopoly practices by imposing fines or applying criminal laws on monopolies
Government regulations
monopolist is not free to charge the price that he wants; the government forces monopolist to charge a specific price
Marginal cost pricing
government forces the monopolist to set P = MC
Average cost pricing
government forces the monopolist to set P = ATC
Price discrimination/’differentiation’
charging different prices for the same good
charge high price for people who have Dinelastic (don’t care as much, not sensitive, ‘exploit’ consumers)
charge low price for people who have Delastic (get upset quickly, sensitive)
Conditions for price discrimination
there must be a monopoly power (doesn’t work for perfect competition)
market segregation: charge different prices based on difference in elasticities
people with elastic demand = low price
people with inelastic demand = high price
resale is not possible
it not be possible to get the good from the cheaper market and resell it in the expensive market to make money/profit off of it
Patent (‘copyright’)
you are protected for some time
you behave as a monopolist for some time (you are the only one who can produce an item)
impact of a patent
the patent protects the producer from competition for a certain period of time. In Canada, it is 20 years. During this period, you will act as a monopolist. But after the patent period ends, the market will be perfectly competitive
Characteristics of Monopolistic Competetition
large number of buyers and sellers
free entry and exit (causes breakeven in the long-run)
products are differentiated (are different/not identical)
each firm sets its own price, a firm has some, limited monopoly power
Comparison of perfect comp., monopoly, and monopolistic comp.
perfect comp.: P=MR
monopoly: P and MR are steep
monopolistic comp.: P and MR are flatter than monopoly
Supply ‘curve’ of a monopolist competitive firm…
has no supply curve, similar to monopoly, but has a supply point
Short-run Equilibrium of a monopolistic competitive firm… case 1: abnormal profit
occurs when price exceeds average total cost, leading to positive economic profits for firms in the short run
Short-run Equilibrium of a monopolistic competitive firm… case 2: breakeven (“normal profit”)
occurs when price equals average total cost, resulting in zero economic profits for firms in the short run
Short-run Equilibrium of a monopolistic competitive firm… case 3: loss
occurs when price is below average total cost, resulting in negative economic profits for firms in the short run
Long-run Equilibrium of a monopolistic competitive firm
due to the free entry and exit: in the long-run, all monopolistic competitive firms will acheive breakeven (‘normal profit’) - no loss and no profit
if there are profits: new firms will enter the market, these new firms will take some of your customers, D and MR decreases on my product, this entry keeps going until profits disappear
if there are losses: some existing firms will exit/’leave’, their customers switch to remaining firms, D and MR increase on remaining firms, this exit keeps going until the loss disappears
Does monopolistic competition achieve efficiency?
productive efficiency: NO; b/c it does not produce with the lowest LATC
allocative efficiency: NO; b/c P ≠ MC
note: the only market structure that achieves both allocative and productive efficiency is PERFECT COMPETITION
Effect of advertising
each firm tries to advertise to get more customers
advertising causes…
increased demand and MR, become steep “inelastic”; customers will be more attracted to you if you advertise
increased ATC; “shift up”; advertising costs money to the firm
Characteristics of an Oligopoly
few sellers that compete
sell similar or differentiated products
high barriers to entry (high costs, small market)
mutual interdependence
when a firm decides its policy, it takes into account the reaction of other firms (competitors)
Cartel
is a group of firms that act together by coordinating their decisions
if all firms formed a cartel, they will act as a monopolist and this gives them higher profits than competing
Why is ‘forming a cartel’/colluding not possible?
it’s illegal due to antitrust laws (antimonopoly laws) - illegal to form a monopoly
each firm will have an incentive to cheat or deviate as long as there is no binding contract
Payoff matrix
table (given in Q); is a tool used in game theory to show the possible outcomes of a strategic interaction between firms, highlighting the potential profits or losses associated with different actions taken by those firms.
A game consists of…
players
strategies (‘options’)
payoff (‘outcomes for every combination of strategies’/combinations, outcomes, returns)
The first number in each cell belongs to the player on the…
LEFT
The second number is the payoff to player on the…
TOP
Pareto optimal/’efficient’ outcome
cooperative outcome of the game; is the outcome that makes both or at least one of the players better off without making someone else worse off
although it’s a better outcome for both, both firms won’t go for it (it’s not stable, people deviate/cheat)
Nash equilibrium
noncooperative outcome; is the outcome of the game where none of the players have an incentive to deviate/move away from it
Dominant strategies
are strategies that yield a higher payoff for a player regardless of what the other players choose (better strategy no matter what). In games with dominant strategies, a player will always opt for their dominant strategy to maximize their outcome.