1/41
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What are the bundle of sticks in property rights?
Right to Use
Right to Exclude
Right to Destroy
Right to Transfer
What cause of action is used to enforce the right to exclude?
Trespass
What limits the right to exclude?
Necessity and Consent
Trespass
1) Intentional
2) Unprivileged Entry
3) Onto land in possession of another
Intentional
Voluntarily entering onto land
Unprivileged Entry
Without consent or necessity
In possession of another
Another individual has property rights over the land
Right to Use
The legal entitlement to utilize one’s property without interference
Limited by Nuisance, Spite Fence, Zoning Ordinances/Statutes
Nuisance
A legal claim involving the use of one’s property in a way that unlawfully interferes with another’s enjoyment of their property
1) Intention
2) Nontrespassory
3) Unreasonable
4) Substantial Interference
5) With the use/enjoyment of the property of another
Spite Fence
A fence built or maintained to annoy a neighbor.
1) Erecting an unusually high fence/structure
2) For the sole purpose of annoying a neighbor
Right to Destroy
Legal right of a property owner to alter, demolish, or dispose of their property as they see fit, subject to applicable laws and regulations.
Depends heavily on the jurisdiction’s laws/society’s values
Personal Property
movable
Real Property
The ground and anything attached to it
Capture
Acquiring unowned property
Rule of Capture for unowned animals
“Possessory rights may be claimed if you show actual possession, mortally wound the animal and remain in pursuit, or deny the animal of its liberty
Conversion
The exercise of wrongful dominion over the personal property of another
Constructive Possession
Where one owns property and an animal walks onto that property. The landowner has “constructive possession” over the animal.
Animus Revertendi
Where one has a tamed, wild animal with a tendency to return.
Possessory rights are maintained even when it wanders off
Adverse Possession
Allowing one to go onto property and do something with it when the one with rights to the land does not object
Defense against Trespass
1) Entry and Actual Possession
2) Exclusive Possession
3) Open and Notorious
4) Continuous Possession
5) Adverse and Hostile
6) For the Statutory Period
Entry and Actual Possession
The claimant must physically use the land in the same manner that a reasonable owner would, given its character, location, and nature.
First, describe the property and it’s natural characteristics
Second, identify what a true owner would do with such property
Exclusive Possession
The claimant’s possession can’t be shared with the owner or with the public in general.
Takes steps to indicate that it’s their property.
Ex. fence/no trespassing signs
Open and Notorious
Possession must be visible and obvious, so that if the owner made a reasonable inspection of the land, he would become aware of the adverse claim.
Is their possession hidden? did they leave a mark on the land?
Adverse and Hostile
a) Possession NOT authorized by the owner.
b) Mindset required to establish. (JX Split).
i. Good Faith jx. Claimant has true belief that the land is theirs and they are simply mistaken.
ii. Bad Faith jx. Claimant intends to take title from the owner.
iii. Abolished. Claimant’s state of mind is irrelevant.
Continuous Possession
Claimant’s possession must be as continuous as a reasonable owner’s would be, given the character, location, and nature of the land.
For the Statutory Period
Depends on statute provided.
When did the adverse possession start, and whem can they claim a title according to the statute?
Do they require tacking?
Tacking
Succeeding periods of possession by different persons may be added together to satisfy the statute of limitations so long as the successive possessors are in privity.
Privity, meaning a reasonable connection between successive occupants of property.
Ex. “Buyer/Seller.”
NEVER successive trespassers.
May be exemplified by deed, intestate succession, or will. (Grantor/Grantee / testator/devisee / heir)
Prior possessors must meet the elements of adverse possession too.
Adverse possession statute: MUST UNDERSTAND!
A: (“An action to recover the title to or possession of real property shall be brought within four years after the cause thereof accrued, but if a person entitled to bring such action), (at the time the cause thereof accrues),
B: (is within the age of minority, of unsound mind, or imprisoned, such person, or anyone claiming from, by, or under such person, may bring such action within three years after such disability is removed, whichever date is later.”) This statute WILL be on the exam!!
A: A person has X years to bring a COA of trespass against someone who begins to take possession of property and develops a claim for adverse possession.
B: If at the time the adverse possession claim begins, that person is a minor, of unsound mind, imprisoned, or has a disability, they have Y years after the disability to removed to bring a claim of trespass against an adverse possessor.
Between A & B (whichever is longer) will provide the amount of time for the statutory period required to receive property rights through adverse possession.
Lost Property
Property that the owner unintentionally and involuntarily parts with.
Ex. phone on the street
Superior rights? First finder/true owner
Mislaid Property
Property that the owner voluntarily and knowingly places somewhere but then unintentionally forgets/leaves it.
Ex. leaving phone in bathroom
Superior rights? Landowner/true owner
Abandoned Property
Property that the owner knowingly relinquishes all right, title, and interest to.
Ex. Coke thrown into trash
Superior rights? First finder
Treasure Trove
Property the owner concealed in a hidden location long ago.
Will never be treasure trove b/c not old enough!
Superior rights? First finder
Bailment
Rightful possession of goods by a person who is not the owner
Bailor
True owner of the property
Bailee
Person who has rightful possession of the goods.
Larceny
COA against another’s taking of personal property
“Unlawful taking of another’s personal property
Gifts
The immediate transfer of property rights from the donor to the donee without any payment or consideration
Inter Vivos
Gift Causa Mortis
Intervivos Gifts
Defense against conversion
1) Donative Intent
2) Delivery
3) Acceptance
Donative Intent
Donor must intend to make an immediate transfer of an interest in property
Delivery
Property must be delivered to the donee so that the donor parts with dominion and control
May be…
Manual: Donor physically transfers possession of the item to the donee. Required if practicable
Constructive: Donor physically transfers to the donee an object that provides access to the item. (ex. key that provides access to a house)
Symbolic: Donor physically transfers an object that represents the item. (ex. stocks/deed)
Acceptance
Donee must accept the property.
Acceptance of valuable property is presumed.
Evidenced by use of gift
Engagement Rings
MAJ: conditional on marriage
MIN: considers fault in returning the ring, and the ring is given to the “not at fault” party
Gift Causa Mortis
1) Donative Intent
2) Delivery
3) Acceptance
4) Donor’s anticipation of imminent death
5) Donor’s death from the anticipated ailment or event
**Revocable any time before death
**MAJ: if the person doesn’t die from the anticipated ailment/event, the gift is revoked automatically.