Psych unit for topic one and two

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/121

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 11:14 AM on 9/14/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

122 Terms

1
New cards
Socialisation
The process through which individuals learn the norms, values, behaviours, roles and expectations of their society.
2
New cards
Primary socialisation
Occurs during early childhood within the family or primary care network. It teaches fundamental cultural norms, language, baseline values and foundational identity through intimate, high-contact emotional relationships.
3
New cards
Secondary socialisation
Occurs outside the home throughout later childhood and adulthood. Agents include schools, peer groups, workplaces and mass media. It teaches formal societal rules, specialised roles, social expectations and institutional norms.
4
New cards
Gender
The socially constructed characteristics, expectations, roles and behaviours attributed to biological sexes.
5
New cards
Biological theory of gender role formation
Gender roles are influenced by biological factors such as sex chromosomes, hormones and neurological structures. Inherent biological predispositions influence gendered behaviours and traits.
6
New cards
Social Learning Theory (Bandura)
Gender roles are acquired through observation, imitation and modelling of gender-typical models such as parents, peers and media. Behaviours are reinforced through operant conditioning, such as praise or discouragement.
7
New cards
Cognitive Developmental Theory (Kohlberg)
Children actively construct schemas of gender as their cognitive maturity develops through the stages of gender identity, gender stability and gender constancy.
8
New cards
Gender identity
The first stage of Kohlberg's cognitive developmental theory, where children recognise and label their own gender.
9
New cards
Gender stability
The second stage of Kohlberg's cognitive developmental theory, where children understand that gender remains stable over time.
10
New cards
Gender constancy
The third stage of Kohlberg's cognitive developmental theory, where children understand that gender remains constant across situations, even when appearance or behaviour changes.
11
New cards
Compliance
Changing public behaviour to gain rewards or avoid disapproval while privately disagreeing. It is temporary and generally lasts only while the group or monitoring source is present.
12
New cards
Identification
Conforming to behaviours or beliefs to maintain a valued relationship or belonging to a specific group. It is adopted publicly and semi-privately but depends on group membership.
13
New cards
Internalisation
Genuine acceptance of a group's beliefs or norms because they align with an individual's core values. It produces a lasting change in both public behaviour and private belief.
14
New cards
Status
An individual's relative social standing or perceived importance within a hierarchy. Higher status generally commands greater influence, attention and compliance.
15
New cards
Role
A socially defined pattern of expected behaviour associated with a particular position, such as teacher, student, guard or prisoner.
16
New cards
Power
The capacity to influence or control resources and interpersonal dynamics.
17
New cards
Reward power
Power based on the ability to provide rewards or positive outcomes.
18
New cards
Coercive power
Power based on the ability to punish or provide negative consequences.
19
New cards
Legitimate power
Power that comes from a recognised position of authority.
20
New cards
Referent power
Power based on identification with, admiration of or respect for another person.
21
New cards
Expert power
Power based on having specialised knowledge or expertise.
22
New cards
Informational power
Power based on possessing information that others need or value.
23
New cards
Effects of high power
High-power dynamics can increase assertiveness and reduce empathy.
24
New cards
Effects of low power
Low-power dynamics can promote submissiveness and conformity.
25
New cards
Conformity
Adjusting behaviour, thoughts or attitudes to match implicit or explicit group pressure.
26
New cards
Obedience
Direct submission to explicit commands issued by a perceived legitimate authority figure.
27
New cards
Descriptive norms
Perceptions of what other people actually do in a given situation. They provide a shortcut or heuristic for deciding what behaviour is normal.
28
New cards
Injunctive norms
Perceptions of which behaviours are approved or disapproved of by others. They represent moral or social rules.
29
New cards
Cialdini et al. (2006) social norms study
The study demonstrated that descriptive norms can influence behaviour. A simple sign asking visitors not to remove petrified wood resulted in less than 2% being stolen, while a sign stating that many previous visitors had removed wood resulted in 8% being taken.
30
New cards
Key finding of Cialdini et al. (2006)
Highlighting negative behaviour can inadvertently normalise that behaviour and increase its occurrence. Interventions are most effective when descriptive and injunctive norms are aligned.
31
New cards
Asch (1955) conformity study
Participants completed a line judgement task and agreed with an obviously incorrect unanimous majority on around 37% of critical trials. About 75% conformed at least once.
32
New cards
Conclusion of Asch's conformity study
The study demonstrated normative social influence, where people conform to fit in and avoid social rejection.
33
New cards
Milgram (1963) obedience study
Participants used an electric shock generator and 65% administered the maximum 450-volt shock under orders from an authority figure.
34
New cards
Conclusion of Milgram's obedience study
Situational pressures and legitimate authority can heavily override personal moral conscience. This is associated with the agentic state.
35
New cards
Agentic state
A state in which a person sees themselves as carrying out the wishes or commands of an authority figure rather than being personally responsible for their actions.
36
New cards
Stanford Prison Experiment (Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973)
Mentally healthy participants were randomly assigned to guard or prisoner roles. Participants rapidly internalised their assigned roles.
37
New cards
Findings of the Stanford Prison Experiment
Guards engaged in psychological abuse and de-individuation, while prisoners became passive and distressed. The study demonstrated the influence of situational roles, status and unchecked systemic power.
38
New cards
Primary conclusion of the Stanford Prison Experiment
Situational demands, assigned roles and systemic power dynamics can rapidly override personal ethics and values.
39
New cards
Secondary socialisation example
A teenager learning informal workplace norms and professional hierarchy during their first job is an example of secondary socialisation.
40
New cards
Gender constancy example
A child realising that biological sex remains the same even when they wear different clothing or play with opposite-gender toys demonstrates gender constancy.
41
New cards
Compliance example
A person recycling at work only because their supervisor is watching and they want to avoid punishment demonstrates compliance.
42
New cards
Identification example
A person adopting the beliefs and lifestyle habits of a group because they value belonging and relationships with its members demonstrates identification.
43
New cards
Bystander intervention
The process of deciding whether and how to help when another person appears to need assistance.
44
New cards
Latané & Darley (1969) bystander intervention study
Participants believed they were communicating through an intercom when another participant appeared to be having a seizure. Helping behaviour decreased as the number of perceived bystanders increased.
45
New cards
Bystander effect
The tendency for helping behaviour to decrease when other people are present.
46
New cards
Key finding of Latané & Darley (1969)
Participants who believed they were alone were most likely to intervene quickly, while helping behaviour decreased as the number of perceived bystanders increased.
47
New cards
Diffusion of responsibility
The belief that responsibility for helping is shared among group members, reducing each individual's personal obligation to act.
48
New cards
Social cues in emergencies
People may look to others for cues about how to respond in an emergency, which can influence whether they intervene.
49
New cards
Prosocial behaviour
Behaviour intended to benefit or help another person or group.
50
New cards
Reciprocity principle
The tendency to help people who have previously helped us. It creates mutual support, cooperation and social relationships.
51
New cards
Social responsibility
The perceived obligation to help people in need, particularly vulnerable or dependent individuals. It is influenced by cultural and social norms.
52
New cards
Empathy
The ability to understand another person's feelings. Greater empathy increases willingness to help.
53
New cards
Mood and prosocial behaviour
Positive mood generally increases helping behaviour, while negative mood may motivate helping to relieve feelings such as guilt.
54
New cards
Competence and prosocial behaviour
Confidence in one's ability to help. Skills and experience can increase the likelihood of intervention.
55
New cards
Altruism
Helping another person without expecting a personal reward, motivated by concern for others.
56
New cards
Groupthink
The desire for harmony within a group that takes priority over critical thinking, potentially leading to poor decision making.
57
New cards
Diffusion of responsibility in groups
When responsibility is shared among group members, each individual feels less personal obligation to act.
58
New cards
Audience inhibition
Fear of embarrassment or judgement from others that can cause hesitation to intervene.
59
New cards
Social influence
Behaviour that is affected by the presence, actions or expectations of other people. It includes conformity, compliance and obedience.
60
New cards
Cost-benefit analysis
Weighing the potential costs against the potential benefits before acting. Helping is more likely when perceived benefits outweigh perceived costs.
61
New cards
General Aggression Model (GAM)
A model explaining aggressive behaviour through the interaction of personal and situational factors, internal states and outcomes.
62
New cards
GAM personal inputs
Personal factors such as beliefs, attitudes and personality that can influence aggressive behaviour.
63
New cards
GAM situational inputs
Situational factors such as provocation and frustration that can influence aggressive behaviour.
64
New cards
GAM internal state
The internal state consists of thoughts, feelings and physiological arousal.
65
New cards
GAM outcomes
The possible outcomes are aggressive behaviour or non-aggressive behaviour.
66
New cards
GAM single episode prediction
A single episode can produce an immediate aggressive response to a situation.
67
New cards
GAM multiple episodes prediction
Repeated aggressive thoughts and behaviours can become reinforced over time, increasing the likelihood of future aggression.
68
New cards
Advertising and aggression
Advertising can normalise aggressive attitudes and may portray aggression as successful.
69
New cards
Video games and aggression
Exposure to violent content in video games can reinforce aggressive scripts and increase aggressive thoughts and arousal.
70
New cards
Social media and aggression
Social media can expose people to cyberbullying, online harassment and hostile interactions. Anonymity can reduce accountability.
71
New cards
Biological explanation of attraction
From an evolutionary perspective, attraction is influenced by reproductive success and preferences for cues associated with health and fertility.
72
New cards
Buss et al. (1990)
Surveyed more than 10,000 participants across 37 cultures to investigate differences in attraction preferences.
73
New cards
Findings of Buss et al. (1990)
Men generally valued physical attractiveness more, while women generally valued resources and ambition more.
74
New cards
Significance of Buss et al. (1990)
The findings support an evolutionary explanation of attraction.
75
New cards
Cultural explanation of attraction
Attraction is shaped by cultural norms and values and is influenced by family, media and society. Standards of attractiveness vary across cultures.
76
New cards
Proximity
Physical closeness that increases opportunities for interaction and can contribute to attraction.
77
New cards
Mere exposure effect
The tendency for repeated exposure to a person or stimulus to increase liking or familiarity.
78
New cards
Reciprocity and attraction
The tendency to like people who like us.
79
New cards
Similarity
Shared attitudes, values and interests that can increase compatibility and attraction.
80
New cards
Self-disclosure
The sharing of personal information with another person, which can build trust and intimacy.
81
New cards
Rollie & Duck's Phase Model of Relationship Dissolution
A model describing relationship breakdown through the intrapsychic, dyadic, social, grave-dressing and resurrection phases.
82
New cards
Intrapsychic phase
Internal dissatisfaction occurs and a person focuses on their partner's faults.
83
New cards
Dyadic phase
Relationship problems are discussed openly, involving conflict and negotiation.
84
New cards
Social phase
Friends and family become involved and the breakup becomes public.
85
New cards
Grave-dressing phase
People create explanations for why the relationship failed and attempt to protect their self-esteem.
86
New cards
Resurrection phase
A period of personal growth in which people learn from the relationship and prepare for future relationships.
87
New cards
Main finding of Latané & Darley's (1969) study
People are less likely to help when other bystanders are present.
88
New cards
Why does helping decrease as the number of bystanders increases?
Diffusion of responsibility means each person feels less individually responsible for helping.
89
New cards
Example of the reciprocity principle
A student helps a friend move house because that friend previously helped them study for an exam.
90
New cards
Example of altruism
Helping another person without expecting a personal reward.
91
New cards
According to the GAM, what influences aggression?
Aggressive behaviour is influenced by both personal factors and situational factors.
92
New cards
How does Social Learning Theory explain gender role formation?
People learn gender roles through observation, imitation and modelling of gender-typical behaviours, which can then be reinforced through rewards or discouragement.
93
New cards
How does Cognitive Developmental Theory explain gender role formation?
Children actively process and construct gender schemas as they mature through the stages of gender identity, gender stability and gender constancy.
94
New cards
How does Biological Theory explain gender role formation?
Gender role formation is influenced by innate physiological factors such as genetics, sex chromosomes and hormones.
95
New cards
What are the three stages of Kohlberg's gender development theory?
Gender identity → gender stability → gender constancy.
96
New cards
What are the three levels of group social influence?
Compliance → identification → internalisation.
97
New cards
Which level of social influence is the deepest?
Internalisation is the deepest level because the individual genuinely accepts the group's beliefs and incorporates them into their own values.
98
New cards
What is the difference between compliance and identification?
Compliance is temporary behaviour change to gain rewards or avoid disapproval, while identification involves adopting behaviours or beliefs to maintain a valued relationship or group membership.
99
New cards
What is the difference between identification and internalisation?
Identification depends on maintaining a relationship or group membership, while internalisation involves genuine acceptance that continues even without the group's presence.
100
New cards
What is the difference between conformity and obedience?
Conformity involves adjusting behaviour or beliefs because of group pressure, while obedience involves directly following commands from a legitimate authority figure.