1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Social Contract Theory
explores how individuals consent, to form society and establish a government
(explains legitimacy of political authority + origin of moral/legal obligations)
Thomas Hobbs
state of nature: chaotic and violent
purpose: ensure security + order
type: absolute monarchy
John Locke
state of nature: peaceful + insecure
gov purpose: protect life, liberty, property
gov type: limited gov + constitutionalism
Jean - Jacques Rousseau
state of nature: free + equal, corrupted by society
gov purpose: promote will + equality
gov type: direct democracy
Emmanuel Kant
state of nature: Rational Individuals
gov purpose: uphold moral autonomy
gov type: constitutional repuiblic
John Rawls
state of nature: hypothetic fairness
gov purpose: ensure justice + fairness
gov type: social democracy
state of nature
individuals have absolute bodily anatomy + self-determination, but lack security
Civil society
individual surrenders in exchange for protection + stability
Key distinction
Bodily autonomy is retained where it does not directly affect others, but property + public safety become regulated
9th Amendment
protects enumerated rights, implying abroad the scope of individual freedoms
10th Amendment
reserves power is not granted to federal government for states + individuals
Judicial neglect
courts historically underutilize amendments in defending civil rights
Implications of judicial neglect
many rights have been justified through alternative constitutional interpretations
The role of UN
represents an evolving global social contract, but lacks true sovereignty → dependent on member states weakens its enforcement capabilities
areas needing improvement: nuclear proliferation, climate change, human rights
Bodily autonomy
should be central to legal/political interpretations
prioritize protecting individual rights over political convenience