1/21
Flashcards covering the elements of criminal liability, including Actus Reus, Mens Rea, Automatism, Omissions, and relevant case law.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Actus Reus (AR)
The external element of a crime involving a prohibited act, positive conduct, or movement that causes forbidden harm.
Mens Rea (MR)
A blameworthy state of mind, such as intention or knowledge, that makes a person's mind legally blameworthy.
Actus Non Facit Reum Nisi Mens Sit Rea
A legal maxim stating that 'An Act Does Not Make A Person Legally Guilty Unless His Mind Is Legally Blameworthy.'
Voluntary Act
A movement that involves a willful act, free will, and the ability to control one's own movement.
Automatism
A defense for an act done by a person who is not conscious of what they are doing, such as sleep-walking or acting under concussion, provided it is not caused by a disease of the mind.
Cogdon (1951)
An Australian case where a woman axed her daughter to death while in a somnambulistic state (sleepwalking); she was acquitted as the act was not legally regarded as her act.
Quick [1973]
An English case involving an assault committed while the offender was in a state of hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar).
Sinnasamy (1956)
A Malaysian case where the Court of Appeal rejected an automatism defense based on 'irresistible impulse' from epilepsy, stating it must be proven as a result of insanity under S84 PC.
Illegal Omission
A failure to act that is an offence, is prohibited by law, or furnishes ground for a civil action according to S43 PC.
Lee Sai Yan v PP (1980)
A case involving a failure to prevent a person from entering a bored hole without breathing apparatus, violating a statutory duty under the Factories Act 1973.
De'Souza v. Pashupathi Nath Sarkar (1968)
A case where a ship captain was charged under s.304A PC for failing to send a sick crew member for treatment, violating the Merchant Shipping Act duty to preserve life.
Pittwood (1902)
A case establishing that criminal liability can arise from a duty created by contract, involving a railway gatekeeper who left a gate open.
Miller [1893]
A case where the accused was convicted for recklessly causing damage by omission after failing to take steps to avert a fire he accidentally started with a cigarette.
Direct Intention
A state of mind where the accused has decided to bring about a particular consequence, even if they believe it is unlikely to occur.
Hyam v DPP [1974]
A House of Lords case ruling that intention exists if the defendant knew there was a serious risk that death or serious bodily harm would result from their acts.
R v Moloney [1985]
A case where the House of Lords held that knowledge or foresight of consequences are material to infer intention, but foresight of a 'natural consequence' is not intent itself.
Oblique Intention
Also known as indirect intention; it refers to the foresight of certainty or the foresight of probability regarding the consequences of an act.
S300(d) PC
A Penal Code provision for murder where the act is so imminently dangerous that it must 'in all probability' cause death or injury likely to cause death.
Thabo Meli [1954]
A case where the court upheld a murder conviction for a 'series of acts' where the intent to kill existed during the initial attack, even though the actual death occurred later during the disposal of the body.
Motive
A secondary intention which is generally irrelevant to criminal liability, though it may be relevant as evidence of insanity or as a factual indication.
Ignorantia juris non excusat
A legal principle meaning 'ignorance of the law is no excuse,' as established in cases like Bilbie v Lumley (1802) and Esop (1836).
Strict Liability
A category of offences where a person can be found guilty of criminal conduct without the prosecution needing to prove the element of mens rea.