1/29
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
performance measurement
process when an org establishes parameters where programs, investments, and acquisitions are meeting desired results
key performance indicators (KPIs)
mission + process + pharmacy service outcome measures
measure of performance and key indicators progress towards intended result
focuses on strategic and operational improvement
creates analytical basis for decision making and helps focus attention on most important stuff
benchmarking
continuous process where an org measures and compares its processes with other orgs that are leading in a particular area
3 components of benchmarking
submission
comparisons/reports
quality improvement
*continuous* (CQI)
4 benchmarking considerations
compare your benchmark to similar orgs/individuals
consider size (# of scripts filled) or location (rural vs urban) if possible
differences in benchmarks should be explainable (not apple to orange)
equitable makes easier to achieve goal
benchmarking benefits
determines value and effectiveness
quantifies how much time spent on cognitive work
compares performance to similar institutions
highlights value of services
identifies opportunities to reduce costs
compares effectiveness of initiatives with similar efforts from other places
quantifies opportunities for performance improvement
determines next steps to achieve cost reducing target and utilization improvement
internal benchmarking
measures performance of org against the org over time (compare current/future to past performance)
internal benchmarking goals
develop progress tracking tool and measure data accurately
document major processes regularly
document work efforts required to achieve desired outcomes
track & trend work efforts (pt volume change, new pt care areas, tech)
identify suboptimal outcomes to be corrected & remeasured
external benchmarking strategies
explore and understand reporting options
understand how measures will be reported
review available labor productivity and cost measures
develop systems to measure inpt drug $ separately
select meaningful peer reporting groups
identify & follow most important KPIs to compare to peers
review KPIs and compare with 25th, 50th, 75th percentile of peers
train dept benchmarking expert
develop routine process to review KPIs & benchmarking results
understand limitations of external systems
determine ≥1 opportunity for overall labor efficiency improvement and total cost performance
if don’t like pharmacy labor productivity ratios then review nursing’s and compare to peers
market what’s learned and understand admin expectations
understand benefits of internal benchmarking > external
external benchmarking challenges
consistent data defns and clear data collection
data cleaning
adjusted vs unadjusted outcomes
case mix (address diff across orgs)
challenges determine right comparison groups
why should pharmacists be included in amb care clinics?
improve quality of care
enhance pt outcomes
contribute to cost avoidance
4 amb care pharmacy practice models
employed - employed as staff member (large group practice)
embedded - partnership with hospital/pharm school (part time)
regional - serve multiple sites across area in health system (pop health)
shared resource network - contracted by provider group to provide service to specific pts (assumes admin responsibilities)
4 pharmacist workflow patterns
pre-appointment planning
coincident referral/covisit (“warm handoff”)
follow-up referral
targeted consultations
pre-appointment planning
Rx reviews chart or meets with pt
Rx makes recommendation to PCP
PCP meets pt
coincident referral/covisit
PCP meets patient
Rx joins end of visit or after (back-back)
Rx makes recommendation to PCP
follow-up referral
PCP meets pt
PCP refers pt to meet with Rx
Rx meets separately with pt
targeted consultations
pt meets criteria for Rx consult
consultation placed by PCP or Rx
Rx provides service
why must pharmacists use indirect billing in the clinic?
recognized as “non-physician providers” (NPP) under Medicare so can’t directly bill for services
—> Rx can receives billing indirectly by submitting bill to payer through another recognized provider
HCPS codes
Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System
based on CPT but more dimensional
level 1 - identical to CPT (5 #s)
level 2 - nonphysician services & J-codes (non-oral meds & chemo)
level 3 - local HCPCS codes
CPT codes
Current Procedural Terminology
describe procedure/service given to pt
6 services that contribute to generating revenue under Medicare Pt B
incident-to-physician
facility fee
annual wellness visit
transitional care management
chronic care management
diabetes self management training
medicare incident-to-physician billing
hospital or physician based clinic
requires direct physician supervision
avoid w/ preappointment planning & coincidental referral
only bill up to least complext level = “nurse-only”
medicare facility fee billing
only hospital-based clinics
flat fee (reimbursed the same regardless of time/effort)
requires direct physician supervision
avoid w/ preappointment planning & coincidental referral
medicare annual wellness visit
promotes preventative service
requires direct physician supervision
able to bill service on same day as PCP visit
medicare transitional care management
following discharge to prevent/decrease hospital readmission
bundled payment for all HCPs on team for the month
medicare chronic care management
non face-face
pt gives consent
bundled payment for all HCPs on team for the month
medicare diabetes self management training
must be accredited program but CDE not necessary
bill using pharmacy’s NPI
referral from PCP or NPP
approaches for demonstrating financial value of a service (justification)
revenue generator
cost avoidance
quality improvement (should lead to revenue generation & cost avoidance)
calculate expected payment for Pt B drug using J-code billing units
(drug dose/J-code dose)(J-code payment)