3 Ways to Identify Premises and Conclusions

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/5

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering the three methods for identifying premises and conclusions on the LSAT, along with specific premise and conclusion indicator words.

Last updated 1:30 PM on 9/1/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

6 Terms

1
New cards

Persuasion Method

The first method to identify premises and conclusions by asking yourself, 'What does the author really want me to believe?' or what the author wants to persuade you of, relying on intuition.

2
New cards

"Why should I believe this sentence?" Method

The second method for identifying premises and conclusions, involving trial and error by picking a candidate conclusion sentence and asking what reasons the passage provides to accept it.

3
New cards

Indicators Method

A mechanical third method for identifying premises and conclusions that utilizes words whose role in the English language is to indicate support structure.

4
New cards

Conclusion Indicators

Words or phrases usually followed by the conclusion: consequently, therefore, as a result, so, clearly, it follows that, accordingly, we may conclude, it entails, hence, thus, we may infer that, it must be that, it implies that, and that is why.

5
New cards

Premise Indicators

Words or phrases usually followed by premise(s): given that, seeing that, for the reason that, owing to, as indicated by, after all, and on the grounds that.

6
New cards

Premise Indicators containing the Conclusion

Words or phrases that are usually followed by premise(s) but contain the conclusion: for, since, and because.