1/99
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
words to describe insanity before
Crazy, Insane, Psycho, Nuts, Deviant, Mental, Weird, Loony, Abnormal psychology
psychology
study of behavior thoughts emotion
psychopathology
suffering of the mind
abnormal psychology
when behaviors, thoughts, emtions “go wrong” don’t function properly
supernatural and middle ages
battle between good and evil
Treatment: trephining (religious figures -drilling hole in peoples head for evil spirits to come out)
Movements of sun and earth - abnormality
Lunatic comes from latin
moon
treatment approaches - church
make body uninhabitable
-e.g. exercism, burning, drowning, when devil posses man they would make garlic portions
medical / biological view
plato - insanity defense for mental ill
hippocrates
treat psychological disorders like other medical problems
3 classes of mental disorders
-mania
-Melancholia
-phrenitis
phrenitis
brain fever
galen
humoral theory of mental disorders
-body had four main liquids
body main 4 liquids by galen
blood (sanguine, black bile (spleen), melancholic, phlegm (brain), yellow bile liver
galen treatment
put humors back in balance / regulate the environment
-barbers pole game from galen: symbolizing historical roots as they were barber surgeons, blood and white meant blood and bandages and blue was veins
historical perspective
Asylum,
bedlam
La Bicetre(st. Mary in Bethlehem and was made into an asylum, widely known for bad conditions and practices, exhibited to public, one penny a look
-treatment here was inhumane (patients were shackled to the walls, no furnishing, never swept or cleaned)
asylums - humanitarian
pinel - 1792 in france (La Bicetre)
moral managment in america
pinel -1792 in France (La Bicetre
treat mental patients with kidness and consideration
moral managment in America
-focused on patient’s social, individual, and economic needs
-emphasized patients moral and spirtual development and not just focused on illness
-benjamin rush was bag component in moral managment
mental hygiene movement
-dorthea dix
-biological basis
-social and psychological side was relevant
dorthea dix
advocated for human treatment in asylums, started 32 institutions in the U.S.
19th century “alienists”
emotional problems caused by expending too much energy, excess living
-exhausted nerves
-nervous breakdown: connecting the perceived cause of mental illness and treatment
modern approaches
biological, psychological
modern approaches: biological
general paresis and psyphilis + psychotic symptoms
paresis
syphilis of brain (die 2-5 years after diagnosis)
differentiating paresis from psychosis
live longer life with psychosis
course of illness: how condition develops and changes over time
paresis cont’d
1897: von krafft-ebing inoculated paresis patients with syphilis sores
1917: treated syphilis with malaria
causes and treatment of mental disorder by medical science
drug treatment of mental illness
resperine
chlorpromazine and neuropletics in 1950s
beginning of search of biological cause of psychotic disease
resperine
originally for cardiac problems, in 1950 it accidently was found
dopamine hypothesis for schizophrenia
that high dopamine was the cause
in todays modern world the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) want to find biological causes and reasearch
psychological approaches
mesmer, Jean Charcot, Breuer and Freud
Mesmer
from vienna in late 1700s
gets the name mesmorizedL wore a robe and touched patients with chemicals to remove hysterical fits and paralysis
began hypnosis
believed people have magnetic forces that are in your body
jean Charcot
paris 1800s
began psychological cause of mental disorders like hysteria
psychological causes
influences freud
Breuer
breur used hypnosis to treat patients
talking cure to treat patients like Anna O.
catharsis
emotional release of unconscious tenion
-insight was lacked of individual problems
-unconscious mind was discovered
freud and psychoanalysis
structure of mind was used to explain human behavior
-Id
-ego
-superego
-psychosexual state of development
ID
the primal part of your personality, instinct, drive, pleasure principal, immedite gratification
ego
rational to mediate between your desires and desires of external world
super ego
your own oral context, judges your actions and others from internalized standard
-defense mechanisms: unconscious resources used for protection of mind battle
defense mechanisms
unconscious resources used for protection of mind battle
Psychosexual state of development: Freud life was built through tension and pleasure with sexual energy
psychosexual state of development
Freud life was built through tension and pleasure with sexual energy
neurosis and disorders
result of unconscious battles or conflict, arose when defense mechanisms were not working well
free association and dream analysis
two types of treatment, free association; speaking freely of one self and anything on their mind, then dream analysis: patients record and say their dreams, share what u dreamt and connect it to your mental health
defense mechanisms
-denial
-displacement
-projection
-rationalization
-reaction formation
-repression
-sublimation
displacement
discharging pent up feelings, e.g. someone treated badly at work initiates an argument with partner at home
projection
express your motives to others
rationalization
sing explanations to conceal or disguise motives for ones behavior; can be present in someone who steals money bc they needed it more than person
reaction formation
expression of unacceptable desires; teases or insults crush
repression
preventing painfull thoughts into your conscious
sublimation
channeling frustrated energy into substitute activities that are more socially acceptable
experiemental psychological laboratories
-wihelm wundt, cattell, lightner, chiacgo juvenile psychopathic institute
wihelm wundt
first experiment lab, studied memory and sensations
cattell
mental functions
lighter witmer
combined research with application
chicago juvenile psychopatic institute
1909, saw delinquency came from the environment not personality
behaviorsim
understanding human behavior
pavlov
classical conditioning, e.g. dogs salivate to a non food stimulus like bell when bell was before presented with food
watson
founder of behaviorism, the role of environment is important in abnormal and normal.
we need to study things we see was believed by
rosalie rayner, mary cover jones, joseph wolpe, skinner
rosalie rayner
(little albert was a kid conditioned to fear white fluffy things)
mary cover jones
found ppl can unlearn conditions fear
joseph wolpe
elaborate on Jones' systematic desensatization: can treat mental disorders with behaviorism. Anxiety is a condition response, treating phobias: when someone is afraid of spiders you take them outside and feel less anxious
skinner
associated with operate conditioning, shaving: behavior is shaped when something reinforces an activity
cognitive perspective
aaron beck and albert ellis
aaron beck
important for this perspective; schemas came from his work that guides and process information
albert ellis
rational-immotive behavior therapy which is maladaptive thought process that hurt you in the long run
biopsychosocial model
if someone has depression or anxiety they can take a medication
why define abnormality?
· As humans we like to categorize things and it improves communication to reduce confusion. Need a consensus / working definition to make scientific process, makes easier for research or clinical work
classification
cutoffs/thresholds for defining normal-abnormal, we want to be objective
implications and dilemmas of having a definition
Abnormal Implies undesirable
-wrong behavior or needs to be fixed
Most definitions of abnormality are arbitrary
Or the definition change over time/history with the context we’re in
-the treatment to patients changes
-we can disagree because beliefs change with time and future
categorical psychopathology
symptoms in a category are the same and don’t overlap, it’s either abnormal or normal
categorical psychopathology strengths
simple and clear, useful for treatment, communicates well, research, and consistency
categorical psychopathology weaknesses
oversimplifies psychopathology, comorbidity, heterogeneity, diagnostic thresholds are arbitrary, stigma, limited individualization
dimensional psychopathology strenghts
a. it’s on a spectrum of normal to abnormal, you can have a mix of both, can use percentage above or below, e.g. above 95% for weight is overweight for age, 50% is in the middle, 25% is low
-e.g. Blood pressure is dimensional; it’s on a continuum, top number can be 80-120 or the bottom can be 60-90
-measuring a patients anxiety level
dimensional strengths
captures severity, more individualized, recognizes continuity, better for comorbidity, tracks change, avoids rigid cutoffs
dimensional weakness
less simple, cutoffs may be needed, more complex assessment, less familiar, unclear boundaries
prototype psychopathology
mixture of categorical and dimensional, there are essential characteristics that must be present, secondary features are sometimes not present
-e.g.
Define a dog; dogs can have fur and ears but so can a bear
-you know it when you see it, some things have to be there
-traits come together that are recognizeable
-e.g.
With depression you think you know it when you see it, feeling worthless,
insomnia, but it can look different in other people
-e.g.
Patient 1 has insomnia but patient 2 sleeps well but has gained a lot of
weight: they both have major depression, their symptoms overlap
prototype strengths
flexible, realistic, less rigid, clinically useful, can capture unusual cases
prototype weaknesses
subjective, less precise, potential for bias, less standardized, overlap
statistical deviation
rare behavior that deviates from the average: more deviation, more abnormal
-if you’re 1-2 standard deviations above your normal
how to decide the cutoff for a problem?
· E.g. the amount of times you check if your door is locked
Is it associated with the negative vs positive side of the problem?
When we think of sadness versus happiness, we focus on the negative side of things.
what about people who are not distressed?
E.g. people deviate from normal behavior, but does that make it abnormal? People who are manic can have a skewed perception of themself
distress
more distressed a person is the more abnormal they can be, personal suffering defines abnormality
normative deviation
does behavior violate cultural / societal norms
e.g. shaving your beard was weird, if you were left-handed it was seen as bad luck or evil and kids were retained
-these things can change overtime
-CONEXT important
classification, why
a. As humans we like to categorize things, we need cutoffs/thresholds for defining normal-abnormal, we want to be objective. Define/ classify abnormality can improve communication; reducing confusion. We. Need a consensus / working definition to make scientific process, make it easier for research or clinical work.
*on test: ways of defining abnormality is height and weight, natural variation and ranges,
what does a classification system do?
summarizes much information in fewer dimensions (e.g. periodic element chart), improves communication
Clinicians can communicate better when there’s a classification
helps new predictions; advance science
-can compare and contrast things, put a label
Importance: is it an apple or an orange?
-makes it so we put apples and oranges in separate nuggets
-system used drives what we know at a certain time and what we don’t know
what are the challenges and controversies about calssifying human behavior?
Human behavior is complex and exists on a continuum, so putting people into fixed categories can be difficult. Classification systems can have overlapping disorders, cultural biases, stigma, and problems with reliability and validity. There is also debate over whether mental disorders represent distinct diseases or different combinations/severities of problems in living.
DSM history from 1-5
DSM: 1 (1952): try to standardize diagnosis after WW2
DSM II (1968): both narrative, jargony, low reliability, psychodynamic theoretical basis
DSM III (1980): different approach – improve reliability, introduced simplistic diagnostic criteria
-later on made revisions to classifications, overtime descriptions should change
DSM IV (1994)
DSM -5 (2013)
emil krapelin
· Important historical figure: based on biological tradition
-strong viewpoint biologically through mental disorders
* categorical classification: each disorders has a clear cause, each disorders is different than another disorder, each disorder is different from normality.
* categorized “psychotic” people into manic and dementia praecoz (schizophrenia)
4 D’s of psychopathology
dysfunction, distress, deviance, dangerousness
dysfunction
can you function on the daily
distress
does it cause physical or emotional distress to the individual or people around them.
deviance
does it lead to judgments of abnormality, social cultural or historical context
dangerousness
behaviors or feelings that can harm the individual or those around them
-suicidal thoughts or self harm
-kids hitting their parents
*At what point does this become significant? Is it different from person to person
jerome wakefield
“A mental disorder is a mental condition that a) causes significant distress or disability, b) is not merely an acceptable response to a particular event, and c) is a manifestation of a mental dysfunction
harmful dysfunction
a breakdown of one's emotional or behavioral function. You hallucinate or lose touch of reality. Being afraid when leaving the house
-failure of our faculties to function the way they were supposed to
thomas szasz
myth of mental illness
-conventional label
-social construct
-social phenomenon
-value judgment
-NOT suffering from mental illnesses, but rather from problems in living
conventional label
just wants to label the behavior that society finds unwanted or unpleasant
social construct
mental illness is a social construct and not a mental illness
social phenomenon
metaphor or strategy for managing deviant behavior
value judgment
how we all judge things differently
reliability
measure gives same result each time, DSM IV big improvement; good reliability
validity
a. measures what designs to measure
-reliability necessary for validity