1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What does it mean that Hardy-Weinberg is a null model?
It means that if smth were in HW equilibrium, nothing is happening evolutionarily
Why do we use a null model?
It tells us if this situation is interesting or not
If it fits the null model, nothing interesting is going on, so we don’t care
Basics of HW equilibrium
If observed genotypes differ from expected, it is not in HW equilibrium
HW equilibrium equation
p² + 2pq + q² = 1
p + q = 1
How to calculate p and q from given genotype frequencies?
PP, PQ, QQ
PP = p² and PQ = 2pq
to get p, do [PP + 1/2PQ]/#population
to get q, do [QQ + 1/2PQ]/ #population
Explain the malaria/sickle-cell thing
AA = normal hemoglobin, but susceptible to malaria
AS = carrier of sickle-cell disease so some mild anemia, protected from malaria
SS = severe sickle-cell disease, dies young
HW assumptions & what it means if it is violated
Random mating: non-random mating/inbreeding/assortative mating
No natural selection: differential survival or reproduction
No mutation: new alleles entering the gene pool
Extremely large population: genetic drift/sampling error
No gene flow: migration/gamete movement
What is HW good and no good for?
Good: predict genotypic frequencies from allele frequencies, detect a mismatch between expected and observed genotypes, frame testable hypotheses about mechanisms
Not good: identify the EXACT mechanism causing every deviation, PROVE natural selection without biological evidence, REPLACE sampling/statistical analysis in real studies