Kant's Ethics and Categorical Imperative

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/38

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards on Kant's Categorical Imperative and Ethics

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

39 Terms

1
New cards

Categorical Imperative - First Formulation

"Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."

2
New cards

First Formulation Meaning

Only act on principles that you could rationally will everyone to follow.

3
New cards

Difference between Categorical Imperative and Golden Rule

The Golden Rule is based on desire; the Categorical Imperative is based on rational will and universality.

4
New cards

Most Eloquent Version of Categorical Imperative

Kant’s own phrasing in Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.

5
New cards

Formula of Humanity

"Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never merely as a means."

6
New cards

Absolute Worth

Worth that does not depend on usefulness; humans have it because of rationality.

7
New cards

Relative Worth

Value based on usefulness; things have relative worth.

8
New cards

Treating something as an 'end in itself'

To respect it for its own sake, not just for what it can do for you.

9
New cards

Treating something as a 'means to an end'

To use it as a tool to achieve your own goals.

10
New cards

Beings with Absolute Value

Rational beings.

11
New cards

Why Rational Beings have Absolute Value

Because they can legislate moral law and act according to reason.

12
New cards

How Kant decides if an alien is a person

If it can reason and act morally, it has personhood and moral value.

13
New cards

Three Primary Formulations of the Categorical Imperative

  1. Formula of Universal Law 2. Formula of Humanity 3. Formula of Autonomy / Kingdom of Ends
14
New cards

Formula of Universal Law

Act only on maxims that could be willed as universal law.

15
New cards

Formula of Humanity Meaning

Treat rational beings as ends in themselves, never merely as means.

16
New cards

Formula of Autonomy / Kingdom of Ends

Act as though your maxims were laws in a kingdom of ends, where all rational beings are lawmakers.

17
New cards

Formulation used for Moral Dilemmas

Formula of Universal Law.

18
New cards

"Complete expression" of Moral Law

Formula of Autonomy / Kingdom of Ends.

19
New cards

One Unqualified Good (Kant)

A good will.

20
New cards

Why a Good Will is the Only Unqualified Good

Because it is good in itself, regardless of consequences.

21
New cards

Qualified Goods

Talents, virtues, or external things that can be misused without a good will.

22
New cards

Value of Good Will Dependent on Effects?

No, it is valuable in itself.

23
New cards

What Makes a Person Worthy of Happiness?

A good will and moral character.

24
New cards

Proper Relationship between Duty and Happiness

We are only worthy of happiness if we are dutiful and moral.

25
New cards

Difference between a Good Will and Will Motivated by Practical Concerns

A good will acts from duty; a practical will acts from self-interest or consequences.

26
New cards

Kant's Interpretation of Loving Enemies

As acting kindly from duty, even when we don't feel love—acting from principle.

27
New cards

Imperatives

Commands of reason directing the will.

28
New cards

Difference between Hypothetical and Categorical Imperatives

Hypothetical = conditional (“if… then… ”); Categorical = unconditional (“do X”).

29
New cards

Type of Imperative that is a Moral Command

Categorical

30
New cards

THE Categorical Imperative (First Formulation)

"Act only on that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."

31
New cards

Four Examples of Duties

  1. Not committing suicide 2. Keeping promises 3. Developing talents 4. Helping others
32
New cards

Problem of the Masochist

They may will harm to themselves—posing problems for universalization.

33
New cards

Problem of the Bigot

A bigot might universalize their hatred—challenging Kant’s universality.

34
New cards

Ends in themselves

Beings with intrinsic worth that must never be used merely as tools.

35
New cards

"Rational Being" to Kant

A being capable of reasoning and moral legislation.

36
New cards

Beings Considered "Things"

Non-rational beings used instrumentally (e.g., animals, objects).

37
New cards

Ethics Represented by Kant

Deontological – duty-based.

38
New cards

Ethics Represented by Bentham

Teleological – consequence-based (utilitarianism).

39
New cards

Core Difference Between Kant and Bentham

Kant focuses on rational duty and universal law; Bentham focuses on maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain.