1/29
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Common IQ tests (e.g. WAIS/WISC) and neurodivergence
Some adjustments can be made
Colourblind version of some tasks
Visual/auditory versions
In WAIS-V, the clinician can skip some tasks
However, tasks are often applied without adjustments
Neurodivergent individuals may be at a disadvantage
Other populations (e.g. immigrants) may be as well
Wilson (2023) - Autism
Meta-analysis
Data from 1,800 neurodivergent people
Children and adults (WISC and WAIS)
Autism performance:
Verbal and nonverbal reasoning - typical range
Processing speed ∼1 SD below the mean
WM - Slightly reduced
Wilson (2023) - ADHD
Meta-analysis
Data from 1,800 neurodivergent people (autism and ADHD)
Children and adults (WISC and WAIS)
ADHD performance:
Mostly at age-expected levels
WM - slightly reduced scores
Courchesne et al.,
None of the autistic children could complete the WISC-IV
May be wrongly regarded as having little cognitive potential
Darwin (1871)
Humans have large brain size in proportion to their body
Especially in comparison to other primates (e.g. gorilla and orangutang)
Therefore indicates relation to higher mental powers
Galton and Head Size
Brains do not stop growing if you attend university
At 19, men with high honours have a larger brain than others
By 25, this difference decreases
Therefore, high honour men are more precocious and gifted
Rushton & Ankey (1996)
Brain size correlates with cognitive ability = 0.44
Brain size increases with age, sex, social class and race
Cognitive ability increases by age, sex, social class and race
Peters (1993)
Evidence is not strong enough to show that intelligence and cranial capacity are positively related
Brain size only accounts for 2.1% variation in intelligence
What is the point of emphasising brain size and intelligence across sociodemographic differences? - Establish superiority of white males
Too little is known about anatomical differences in the cerebral cortex of large and small, and male and female, brains
McDaniel et al. (2005)
Brain Size/IQ debate: 2005 Meta-Analysis
37 studies
Brain volume/IQ correlation for:
Males = 0.34
Female = 0.40
Children and Adults = 0.33
Overall = 0.33
Pietsching et al. (2015)
Systematic review of published and unpublished studies.
88 studies: 148 healthy and clinical mixed-sex samples (>8000 individuals).
Significant positive correlation (r = .24) between brain volume and IQ.
Generalised over age (children vs adults), IQ domain, and sex.
Publication bias of studies with strong positive correlations
Small and non-significant associations omitted from reports.
Brain Size/IQ debate - Conclusion
The strength of the positive association of brain volume and IQ, although robust, has been overestimated in the literature.
“It is tempting to interpret this association in the context of human cognitive evolution and species differences in brain size and cognitive ability
It is not warranted to interpret brain size as an isomorphic proxy of human intelligence differences.”
Number of Brain Cells and IQ
50 postmortem brains from Danish males (aged 20-52 years) for whom there was documentation of premorbid IQ (mean 94, SD 14).
Found no correlation between IQ and the number of brain cells.
Only a weak correlation between IQ and brain weight.
Near zero correlation with other neocortical structures
Sex differences - Ruigrok et al., 2014
On average, adult male brains have 10.8% larger total brain volume than women
2.1 SD (or 131ml) difference
Dyliert et al. (2009); Flynn (2012); Johnson et al. (2009)
There is also a clear absence of sex differences in IQ
Hence, large brains do not necessarily translate to higher IQ in humans.
Sex Differences - Haier et al.
High IQ in:
Women - More gray and white matter in frontal language areas
Men - More gray matter in posterior sensory integration areas
Sholz et al. (2009)
Changes in white matter as a result of learning an entirely new skill
Maguire et al. (2000)
London Cab Drivers
Significantly larger hippocampal volume
Responsible for spatial navigation
Woollett & Maguire (2011)
Qualified cab driver trainees have significantly higher grey matter intensity in the hippocampus
Not the case for trainees who failed and controls
Grey matter increase was specifically linked to the intense spatial learning involved in mastering “The Knowledge” of London’s street layout.
Brain efficiency - Haier et al. (1988)
Measured brain glucose activity (PET)
Correlation between glucose metabolic rate and Raven’s matrices score:
Supraventricular = -0.77
Midventricular = -0.67
Infraventricular= -0.75
Brain Efficiency (PET) - Haier et al. (1992a)
After learning a complex visuo-spatial task (Tetris)
Decrease in cerebral metabolism after practice
Brain Efficiency (PET) - Haier et al. (1992b)
After learning to play Tetris
More pronounced decrease in cerebral metabolism in higher IQ participants (measured using Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices)
Haier and Benbow (1995)
22 male and 22 female participants
Half high and half average SAT-Maths Scores
During the PET scan, each participant completed a new SAT-Maths test.
Male Participants: significant correlations between the math score and glucose metabolism in the temporal lobes bilaterally (middle, inferior, and posterior; analogous to BAs 20, 21, 22).
Female Participants: no correlations.
Ryman et al. (2016) - White Matter Efficiency Differences
Male: no correlation with IQ
Female: positive correlation with IQ
Ryman et al. (2016) - Grey Matter Efficiency Differences
Male: a significant positive relationship between fronto-parietal grey matter region volumes and intelligence.
Female participants: total grey matter volume did predict intelligence in females, but a regionally specific contribution of the fronto-parietal grey matter volume was not evident.
Ryman et al. (2016) - Conclusion
Efficiency of white matter organisation and the total grey matter volume were predictive of intelligence in females.
Intelligence was related primarily to a fronto-parietal grey matter volume in males.
Finn et al. (2015) - Method
fMRI obtained from 126 participants.
6 imaging sessions/participant (mixture of rest and complex cognitive tasks).
Explored functional connectivity patterns (across the whole brain and within 10 key networks).
Individual differences
Connectivity analysis for each person in each condition.
Finn et al. (2015) - Findings
Individual connectivity patterns were stable across all six conditions
Connectivity patterns in the frontoparietal network were the most distinctive
Connectivity profiles appeared to be able to predict levels of fluid intelligence (measured using matrix reasoning)
Functional connectivity
Act as a ‘fingerprint’ that can accurately identify subjects from a large group
Connectivity profiles that are most discriminating of individuals were also most predictive of cognitive behaviour
Definition of a Connectotype
The distinct pattern of brain activity that characterises the way each person’s mind works
Key features of Connectotyping
Occur within the brain’s most sophisticated networks i.e. in the frontal and parietal cortices.
Connectotypes are:
Stable over time - Has been evidenced in adults/children, and humans/non-human primates.
Familial - e.g. the connectotypes of family members resemble one another more than those of strangers.
Appear to also be heritable.