1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
what is believed of the different species of marijuana
commonly believed to have different effects, doesn’t really
different species
cannabis sativa, cannabis indica, cannabis ruderalis
cannabis sativa
longer, narrow leaves; "head high”, energizing
cannabis indica
wider, flatter leaves; “body high”, sedative
cannabis ruderalis
not much flower; not recreational, grown primarily in Eastern Europe for hemp
cannabinoids
more than 100 species
THC
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol
CBD
cannabidiol (delta-8)
how are THC drinks legal in WI?
by using less than 0.3% in products, it is classified as hemp
hemp
0%; 2018 Farm Bill - less than 0.3%
marijuana
~3.5%; highly subjective
sinsemilla
~10%; cannabis comes in male and female varieties, using only female variety = increased budding
hashish
~15-20%; reduced into bricks by heat and pressure
hash oil
~30-50%; high heat and pressure applied, can OD on because percentage is so high
China (6-8,000 BC)
hemp fiber pots; hemp paper (predated and was cheaper than wood pulped paper)
earliest known medical use of marijuana
China, 2700 BC: used to treat asthma
Marijuana in America
cash crop in the South US until replaced by cotton in the 1890s; cultivated by both Spanish and English settlers
Europe
hash popularized by French Foregin Legion soldiers serving in North America
Club de Hachichin - Paris 1840
Victor Hugo, Alexandre Dumas; creative people would smoke together for creativity (cultural)
1920s US
increased popularity because of Prohibition
Marijuana Act of 1937
outlawed the drug, not the plant
hippies
brought back marijuana into modern day; post war world, culture, and young people
Nixon’s movement against marijuana
people against anti-war movement were Jews, making marijuana a felony (schedule 1 drug), it would discredit the anti-war movement
reasons for rising use of marijuana since 2000s
change in hollywood (comedies), medical marijuana, decriminalization, and legalization
ED50
10 micrograms/kg
TD50
unknown, highly individualized
LD50
above 1000mg/kg: no adequate research on this, however
cannabinoid receptors
CB1 (CNS), CB2 (PNS): this distinction was more important before marijuana began to be legalized because of stigma
anadamide
naturally occurring compound (fatty acid NT), in the body that binds to cannabinoid receptors and plays a role in regulating mood, memory, appetite, and pain sensation
acute effects
generally sedative, appetite (anti-nausea), sexual arousal (low levels), sensory distortion, euphoria, loss of motor control, and loss of attention, slowed thinking (perception of time)
chronic
hypothalamic-gonadal, COPD & lung cancer, increased risk of schizophrenia, cannabis hyperemsis syndrome (CHS), immune functioning, cognitive functioning
hypothalamic-gonadal effects
reproductive issues between both genders
COPD and lung cancer
advertisement against THC is misleading due to wanting to scare young people; last 20 years = pop. of people who only smoke weed, not both weed and tobacco
increased risk of schizophrenia
some evidence of increased risk if predisposed and are chronic users who started young (13-14 y/o)
cannabis hyperemesis syndrome (CHS)
chronic use causes violent illness, and serious dehydration
amotivational syndrome
chronic use of marijuana can cause a lack of motivation, or impaired desire, and reduce productivity, as well as poor ST memory
withdrawal
cravings, weight loss (western belief), insomnia
support of gateway hypothesis
early exposure to marijuana; intrinsic and sociocultural arguments
challenge of gateway hypothesis
for 50% of all illicit drug users, marijuana is the only drug used
alcohol, tobacco predate marijuana use for most teens
treatments
mental health-based (CBT, MET, 12-step)
some research in cannabinoid agonist
some research with opiate blockers
synthetic cannabis
greater binding affinity (higher potency) - 100-800x
effects of synthetic cannabis
risk of heart attack and seizures
controversies
THC drinks
Stop and frisk
OWI/OSHA
Inconsistency between federal and state legislation
does decriminalization work (portland v portugal)
portland v portugal
portugal: decriminalization = drug rate drops
portland: decriminalization = drug rate went up