Topic Three: Threats to Internal Validity

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

What is participant reactivity?

when participants react to cues, often unintentionally, in an experimental situation

2
New cards

What is the effect of participant reactivity?

can affect the validity of conclusions drawn from the collected data

3
New cards

What are some examples of participant reactivity?

Social desirability bias and the Hawthorne effect

4
New cards

What is social desirability bias?

when participants want to be seen in a good light, leading them to lie or behave in a different way, or not give true opinions, thinking that it will make others think good of them

5
New cards

What is the Hawthorne effect?

the attention gained from being in a study impacts the behaviour of the participants, impacting the validity of the conclusions drawn

6
New cards

Outline the findings of Roethlisberger and Dickinson (1939)

production levels continued to increase even when lighting levels were changed in a factory, they then realised that the increased attention of the workers was impacting the findings of the study.

7
New cards

What are investigator effects?

when subconscious clues from an investigator encourages certain behaviours from the participants

8
New cards

What can investigator effects include?

anything that the investigator does that affects the performance of a participant, other than what is intended

9
New cards

What can investigator effects lead to?

participants’ fulfilment of the investigator’s expectation

10
New cards

Outline Greenspoon (1955) and the Greenspoon effect

participants’ behaviour could be altered by saying ‘mm-hmm’ after certain responses (e.g. after a desired behaviour to encourage the participant to repeat that behaviour)

11
New cards

How can validity be assessed?

Face validity and concurrent validity

12
New cards

What is face validity?

Does it look like conditions are measuring what they intend to?

13
New cards

What is concurrent validity?

Comparing new test with an already established test that measures the same characteristic.

Correlation of 0.80 or higher desired

14
New cards

How can validity be improved?

Standardised procedures

Ensure participants knows that self-report data is anonymous

Use lie scale/filler question for questionaires

Use covert observations

15
New cards

How can standardised procedures improve validity?

Standardised procedures and instructions limit extraneous variables

Use of single and double-blind procedures for experiments

16
New cards

How can reliability be assessed?

Split-half method

Test-retest method

Inter-observer reliability

17
New cards

What is the split-half method?

Split test in half and score individually

Want correlation of 0.80 or higher between each half

18
New cards

What is the test-retest method?

Test participants once, repeat the same test and see if there’s consistency

Want correlation of 0.80 or higher between the two tests

19
New cards

What is inter-observer reliability?

Have multiple observers rate the same behaviours and see if there’s consistency (+0.80)

20
New cards

How can reliability be improved?

Avoid complex or ambiguous questions in questionnaires

Use same interviewer or ensure all are fully trained - structured interviews

Standardise procedures and instructions for experiments

Behavioural categories should be clear, measurable, not overlap, and all behaviours should be listed