Send a link to your students to track their progress
35 Terms
1
New cards
The ‘reverse course’
* the USA’s policy towards Japan, as early as 1947 * meant the USA was not focused on the punishment of Japan: targeted communists rather than war criminals * the USA wanted to develop firm democratic institutions (restored right-wing conservatives) and practices to rebuild their economy
* the USA wanted to ensure Japan was aligned w/ them as Japan was essential to the USA’s power base in eastern Asia
2
New cards
Economic stabilisation in Japan
* a programme based on austerity and control but its focus was on economic recovery * the USA was keen to ensure all government income and spending was closely monitored and adhered to strict guidelines * ‘super balanced budget’: designed to minimise borrowing and to ensure a surplus which could act as an additional economic cushion
3
New cards
US-Japanese relations
* Japan’s significance entered a new phase once China formed an alliance w/ the USSR in Feb 1950 and then in Nov when it joined the Korean War * this involvement led to the globalisation of containment in many respects * Japan became a crucial component in the US’ quest to contain communism in the Far East * Japan’s Prime Minister Yoshida saw an opportunity to negotiate a treaty which would restore Japan’s sovereignty and ensure its security
4
New cards
The San Francisco Peace Treaty
* September 1951 * the treaty between Japan and the Allied Powers is remarkable by its brevity and its limitations * the treaty did not: place significant restrictions on Japan’s economy or political model; restrict Japan’s rearmament or impose any reparations * the treaty did force Japan to renounce any claims to neighbouring territories * the USSR and China did not sign the agreement
5
New cards
The US-Japan Security Treaty
* drawn up in return for the San Francisco Peace Treaty * gave the USA: unrestricted use of Japanese military bases; administrative control of Owkinawa; right to use military force to intervene in internal disorder in Japan and to veto Japan offering military bases to other states
6
New cards
Mao’s concerns
* at the start of 1949, a communist victory in the Chinese Civil War seemed inevitable and Mao considered the posibility of the US intervening * Mao reached the conclusion this would not happen and that the US was more interested in Europe * however Mao was concerned the US would support an exiled nationalist leader Jiang Jieshi, undermining Mao’s aims
7
New cards
US policy towards China and Taiwan
* US policy towards China and Asia was not linked to Europe * the USA was interested in ensuring the Chinese Communist Party did not come under the influence of the USSR
8
New cards
The China White Paper
* July 1949 * outlined the US’ strategy towards China: Acheson, Secretary of State, was committed to supporting Jiang Jieshi’s nationalist forces (KMT) in Taiwan
* however this should be done secretly so the USA did not appear to be an ‘imperialist menace’ * Acheson wanted the USA to do nothing that might reinforce a Sino-Soviet alliance
9
New cards
NSC-68
* April 1950 * in Sep 1949, the US’ nuclear monopoly ended as the USSR tested its own atomic bomb * this in addition w/ Truman’s ‘loss of China’ triggered a review of the US’s aims and priorities, which emerged in NSC-68 * stressed the urgency of building the US’ political, economic and military power * it was focused on the globalisation of the Cold War and there was a powerful military emphasis on the application of containment
10
New cards
Kim Il Sung and Syngman Rhee
* both the USA and the USSR wanted to install leaders they believed they could control * Kim Il Sung emerged as chairman of the newly formed communist Korean Provisional People’s Committee * Syngman Rhee, a nationalist and virulent anti-communist, emerged as the USA’s favoured leader
* both leaders were committed to the restoration of a united Korea under a single leader
11
New cards
USSR’s interests in the Korean War
* to avoid costly conflict w/ the US * to promote Stalin’s image as a defender of communism * to undermine China as an emerging rival
12
New cards
USSR involvement in the Korean War
* March 1949: Kim Il Sung turns to Stalin for support but Stalin rejects his pleas, wary of US troops’ presence in Korea
* Feb 1950: Stalin agreed to send the North artillery but no troops after China turns communist and because the US did not include Korea in their Defensive Perimeter Strategy * Stalin wasn’t prepared to engage in direct military conflict w/ the US, particularly because of the threat of nuclear war
13
New cards
China’s interests in the Korean War
* to establish China’s credentials as a force in the Far East * to be seen as acting independently of the USSR * to consolidate its position in terms of recovering Taiwan
14
New cards
China’s involvement in the Korean War
* when the North invaded the South, China did not intervene * as late as April 1950, Mao was determined to take no actions that might inflame the US * Nov 1950: China was compelled by the USSR to intervene
15
New cards
The US’ interests in the Korean War
* to ensure stability in the Far East, particularly the security of Japan as an ally * to protect Taiwan from Chinese aggression * to contain communism in the Far East
16
New cards
The UN’s involvement in the Korean War
* post the invasion, the US asked for a Security Council meeting * USSR was boycotting the Council due to its recognition of Jiang Jieshi’s regime as legal and couldn’t use its veto power
* the UN’s resolution to call for a truce was passed w/o opposition and Truman was able to legitimise US intervention in Korea whilst shielding them from responsibility
17
New cards
The settlement
* negotiations started in July 1951 but it wasn’t until July 1953, an armistice was agreed * Rhee was obstructing talks as he wanted to commit the US to stronger ties w/ South Korea * when Stalin died in March 1953 and was replaced w/ the more compliant Malenkov, talks were able to progress quicker * the treaty confirmed: military forces should retreat and there was to be a division line w/ a demilitarised zone on each side
18
New cards
Impact of the Korean War
* long-term security of the North and South, as well as Taiwan, was secured: no more conflict on the Korean peninsula
* war placed economic pressure on the USSR: led to Stalin hastening industrialisation in the Soviet Bloc, and less consumer goods, which led to rebellion * war led to military forces in West Europe being strengthened: West Germany was rearmed and hope for a solution to the German problem was lost and led to a deepening of uncertainty in Europe
19
New cards
McCarthyism
* McCarthy promoted the idea that there was an army of communist sympathisers in the US government * rooted in a growing mood of anti-communism among the US public, which came to a head in 1950 * McCarthy targeted the film industry, the Democrats, universities and the UN; failing to uncover one communist * in 1954, after claiming the ‘Reds’ infiltrated the US army, McCarthy was expelled from the Senate
20
New cards
The House of Un-American Activities Committee
* its purpose was to investigate communist infiltration: the US public came to fear that communists had penetrated the very core of their society * carried out extensive investigations on the political affiliations of Hollywood filmmakers
21
New cards
The Alger Hiss Affair
* 1950 * a prominent member of FDR’s government was accused by a journalist of being a Communist * when Hiss was convicted of perjury, Dean G. Acheson still offered him public support * this only served to heighten the belief that the US’ leaders were somehow tainted w/ communism
22
New cards
US dominance in the United Nations
* the USA used the UN as a vehicle for global intervention, to achieve its foreign policy aims * the USA was a permanent Security Council member, enhancing its power * the UN headquarters are based in NYC: significant in terms of US dominance
23
New cards
The isolation of China
* the US refused to accept China into the UN * the US enhanced their commitment to Taiwan * the development of SEATO and the creation of the strategic defence perimeter also isolated China further
24
New cards
Consequences of Cold War tensions (1949-50)
* USA no longer has a nuclear monopoly (1949) * China turns communist and formed Sino-Soviet alliance (1950) * North Korea invades South Korea (1950) * McCarthyism pushes the US to adopt a globalist stance * European states feel threatened by US focus on Asia
25
New cards
The expansion of alliance systems
* Eisenhower placed much greater importance on developing allies than Truman did * has been argued this was a means of compensating for the lack of development of conventional US forces * Eisenhower’s strategy was to create a global network of alliances to corner the USSR and China
26
New cards
SEATO
* September 1954 * a collective defensive treaty based on Southeast Asia, brokered in response to close Sino-Soviet relations * many of its members were not Southeast Asian countries and didn’t have many common borders, unlike NATO * some important Southeast Asian states such as South Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Burma were excluded
27
New cards
FRG and NATO
* Adenauer, the FRG’s first chancellor, recognised the best way to strengthen his country was to align it w/ Western powers * in May 1955, West Germany was admitted to NATO, underlining the commitment the USA had to the nation
28
New cards
The Warsaw Pact
* May 1955 * the West’s decision to allow FRG into NATO and to rearm caused the USSR to consolidate relations w/ its satellite states * seen by the USSR as a means of legitimising influence in Eastern Europe, just as NATO had for the US in the West * presented as a non-threatening, collective security alliance but served as military reinforcement for the USSR * consolidated the political and economic relationship between the USSR and its satellites
29
New cards
Eisenhower and Dulles
* Eisenhower accepted much of what formed the basis of Truman’s national security policy
* the US would retain influence in Europe and Asia; recognised the Soviet threat as real; remained committed to containment and building up both nuclear and conventional forces * however, Eisenhower rejected Truman’s commitment to a major expansion of conventional forces and believed containment was limited
30
New cards
The New Look policy
* October 1953 * containment had created a stalemate: Dulles wanted to roll back communism in order to bring the Cold War to an end * Dulles was convinced US national interests and the guarantee of international peace relied on reducing Soviet dominance * despite Eisenhower’s acceptance of the principle of liberation, he insisted this could only happen through peaceful terms
31
New cards
Massive retaliation
* Eisenhower and Dulles saw containment as a strategy that demanded a global reaction to communist expansion * this necessitated significant and costly intervention in Korea * under Eisenhower, nuclear weapons assumed much greater significance as the basis for a US national security strategy * Oct 1953: NSC 162/2 emphasised the view the most effective way to deter USSR aggression was for the US to display its determination to use nuclear weapons
32
New cards
Brinkmanship
* a strategy designed to convince an enemy there’s a risk of conflict: one side shows no sign of backing down, forcing the opponent to back down or engage in conflict * the US used its nuclear strength to force agreements from communist opponents * Dulles was convinced the ability to reach the verge of war w/o engaging in war was essential in effective foreign policy
33
New cards
The domino theory
* a that suggested a communist government in one nation would lead to communist takeovers in neighbouring states * closely linked w/ the policy of containment
34
New cards
Attitudes to Indochina
* Eisenhower was committed to supporting the French as Southeast Asia was seen as very vulnerable to communism * Eisenhower was opposed to using conventional forces to support the French, however, preferring a diplomatic solution * the USSR and China wanted to avoid a military resolution too: at this point negotiations were convened in Geneva
35
New cards
The Geneva Conference
* July 1954 * the agreement at Geneva paved the way for a ceasefire rather than a long-term solution * it was agreed two zones were to be created w/ the 17th parallel serving as the dividing line * French forces were to move out of the north zone and nationalist forces were to withdraw from the south * the US and the southern regime wouldn’t sign the agreement