Accounting Data Analytics, Exam 1: Chapters 1-5 cumulative definitions

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/93

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

94 Terms

1
New cards

Federal Court Cases

(5.1) Primary sources of tax law that generally concern controversial areas of taxation.

2
New cards

Ad Valorem

(5.1) A legal instance when the assessment of a tax is according to its property value.

3
New cards

Appellant

(5.1) A party appealing a judicial standpoint to a higher court.

4
New cards

Bona Fide

(5.1) An implication that a judicial standpoint is in good faith, without fraud or deceit. 

5
New cards

Certiorari

(5.1) A process where the U.S. Supreme Court appears to hear a case from a lower appellate court’s decision.

6
New cards

Collateral Estoppel

(5.1) If a factual issue has been determined by a valid judgment, the same parties cannot litigate that factual information again in future litigation of the same parties.

7
New cards

De Facto

(5.1) An implication that a judicial statement is a fact or reality. 

8
New cards

Defendant

(5.1) In civil proceedings, a party that is responding to the complaint.

9
New cards

Dictum

(5.1) A statement or remark in a court opinion that is not necessary to support the decision.

10
New cards

En Banc

(5.1) A decision by a full court, instead of a single judge or selected judges. These occur on the cases of a significant issue.

11
New cards

Enjoin

(5.1) An instance when a judicial statement is commanded or instructed with authority.

12
New cards

Nolo Contendere

(5.1) A trial that ends in no contest.

13
New cards

Non Obstante Veredicto

(5.1) A judicial decision that reverses the jury’s determination.

14
New cards

Parol Evidence

(5.1) A doctrine that renders any evidence for a prior understanding of the parties to a contract completely invalid if it contradicts terms.

15
New cards

Per Curiam

(5.1) An opinion of a judicial court that expresses a decision, but does not identify the author behind it.

16
New cards

Plaintiff

(5.1) The party who initially brings a lawsuit.

17
New cards

Prima Facie

(5.1) An implication that a judicial statement is taken at face value. 

18
New cards

Pro Se

(5.1) An instance when someone chooses to represent themselves in court.

19
New cards

Remand

(5.1) An instance when a higher court sends a case back down to a lower court.

20
New cards

Res Judicata

(5.1) A legal rule that bars the re-litigation of the same set of facts. 

21
New cards

Respondent

(5.1) A judicial party similar to a defendant. In most cases, it is the IRS.

22
New cards

Slip Opinion

(5.1) An individual court decision published separately, shortly after the decision is rendered.

23
New cards

Summary Judgment

(5.1) A court ruling that no factual issues remain to be tried. As a result, the cause of action can be decided without a trial.

24
New cards

Vacate

(5.1) A reversal or abandonment of a court’s prior decision.

25
New cards

Rule 155 Law

(5.1) An instance when the U.S. Tax Court reaches a judicial decision without calculating any taxes.

26
New cards

Golsen Rule

(5.1) A judicial rule that if there are conflicting precedents in Circuit Courts, the U.S. Tax Court is required to follow the precedent in the taxpayer’s jurisdiction.

27
New cards

District Court

(5.3) A trial-level federal court that hears tax cases.

28
New cards

Internal Revenue Service

(4.1) A division of the U.S. Treasury Department that administers tax laws.

29
New cards

IRC Sec. 7805

(4.1) A section of the Internal Revenue Code that allows the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury Department to prescribe rules and regulations necessary to administer the IRC.

30
New cards

Regulation

(4.1) A pronouncement of the tax law that is issued by the IRS and Treasury Department. It is considered to be the official interpretation of the IRC.

31
New cards

Proposed Regulation

(4.1) A form of regulation that is useful for understanding the IRS’ current position, but does not have an effect on the law.

32
New cards

Final Regulation

(4.1) A form of regulation that is finalized and published as a Treasury Decision (TD).

33
New cards

Temporary Regulation

(4.1) A form of regulation that holds the same weight as final regulations, but expire after three years of issuance.

34
New cards

Effective Date of Regulation

(4.1) The date a regulation becomes effective.

35
New cards

Revenue Ruling

(4.1) A pronouncement of the tax law that indicates how the IRS will treat a given taxpayer transaction.

36
New cards

Revenue Procedure

(4.1) A pronouncement of the tax law that instructs taxpayers on how to comply with IRS internal practices and procedures.

37
New cards

Private Letter Ruling

(4.1) A kind of letter ruling that is issued by the National Office of the IRS in response to a taxpayer’s request on a specific tax issue in a proposed transaction.

38
New cards

Technical Advice Memoranda

(4.1) A kind of letter ruling that is requested by an IRS agent during an audit regarding a completed transaction.

39
New cards

Determination Letter

(4.1) A kind of letter ruling that is issued on a taxpayer’s request on a specific tax issue (usually not controversial) related to a completed transaction.

40
New cards

Internal Revenue Bulletin

(4.5) A bulletin created by the IRS, that is used to publish rulings, procedures, regulations, court decisions, and other information valuable to tax professionals. 

41
New cards

Acquiescence

(4.5) An instance when the IRS issues a statement indicating that while it may or may not agree with a decision, they will follow it in similar situations.

42
New cards

Nonacquiescence

(4.5) An instance when the IRS issues a statement indicating they disagree with a decision and will only follow it in specific cases.

43
New cards

Chief Counsel Memoranda

(4.5) A memoranda issued by the IRS’ Office of Chief Counsel that is disseminated as a guide to politics, procedures, instructions, and other information.

44
New cards

Statute

(3.1) A concise summary of the law that outlines its key purpose, scope, and main provisions in a clear and simplified form.

45
New cards

Frivolous Tax Returns

(3.1) A tax return that either lacks sufficient information to determine the taxpayer’s correct liability, or contains information that is clearly intended to delay or impede tax administration.

46
New cards

Tax Treaties

(3.1) Agreements negotiated between countries concerning the treatment of individuals and entities subject to tax in both countries.

47
New cards
48
New cards

Establish the Facts

(2.1) A step in the TR process, where the researcher looks to fully understand all facts that could affect the related tax outcome.

49
New cards

Identify the Issues

(2.1) A step in the TR process, where the researcher uses their education, training, and experience to identify all issues of a tax problem.

50
New cards

Fact Issue

(2.1) A TR issue concerned with information having an objective reality.

51
New cards

Law Issue

(2.1) A TR issue occurring when facts are well-established, but it is not clear which portion of the tax law applies to the issue.

52
New cards

Collateral Estoppel

(2.1) A legal concept that bars re-litigation on the same TR fact or issue.

53
New cards

Locate Authority

(2.1) A step in the TR process, where the researcher must locate the respective legal authority for their issue.

54
New cards

Primary Authority

(2.1) An authority considered an original pronouncement, coming from statutory, administrative, or judicial sources.

55
New cards

Secondary Authority

(2.1) An authority considered an interpretation of a primary authority, and thus an unofficial source of tax information.

56
New cards

Evaluate Authority

(2.1) A step in the TR process, where the researcher must evaluate the usefulness of their selected authorities.

57
New cards

Develop Conclusions and Recommendations

(2.1) A step in the TR process, where the researcher must arrive at their conclusion for the tax issues raised.

58
New cards

Communicate Recommendations

(2.1) A step in the TR process, where the researcher uses a memorandum to communicate the results and recommendations of the research.

59
New cards

Citation

(2.1) A shorthand system of documentation that helps a researcher pinpoint the specific location of relevant text in an authority.

60
New cards

Practice of Taxation

(1.1) The practice of applying tax laws, rules, regulations, and judicial rulings to specific transactions.

61
New cards

Taxation

(1.1) The process of collecting revenue from citizens to fund government operations.

62
New cards

Tax Research

(1.1) An element of tax practice which involves identifying, interpreting, and applying relevant tax laws and authorities to resolve complex tax issues and support accurate decision-making.

63
New cards

Tax Compliance

(1.1) An element of tax practice which involves accurately following tax laws and regulations to prepare, file, and report all required tax obligations on time.

64
New cards

Tax Planning

(1.1) An element of tax practice involving the strategic arrangement of financial activities to minimize tax liability while complying with applicable laws and regulations.

65
New cards

Tax Litigation

(1.1) An element of tax practice involving the process of resolving disputes between taxpayers and law authorities through administrative proceedings or court actions.

66
New cards

Tax Avoidance

(1.1) A legal, legitimate objective to minimize tax liability.

67
New cards

Tax Evasion

(1.1) The process of illegally refusing to pay taxes.

68
New cards

Open Transactions

(1.1) A tax plan for pending future transactions.

69
New cards

Closed Transactions

(1.1) A tax plan for how to best present past transactions.

70
New cards

Contingent Fee

(1.1) A fee based on the successful avoidance of challenge by the IRS, or a successful result in an audit or litigation challenge.

71
New cards

Responsibilities

(1.2) An AICPA Code of Conduct principle which declares that members should exercise professional and moral judgments.

72
New cards

Public Interest

(1.2) An AICPA Code of Conduct principle which declares that members should act in a way that serves the public interest, honors the public trust, and shows a commitment to professionalism.

73
New cards

Integrity

(1.2) An AICPA Code of Conduct principle which declares that members should perform with the highest level of integrity.

74
New cards

Objectivity and Independence

(1.2) An AICPA Code of Conduct principle which declares that members should maintain objectivity and be free of conflicts.

75
New cards

Due Care

(1.2) An AICPA Code of Conduct principle which declares that members should practice professional and ethical standards and strive to improve competence.

76
New cards

Scope and Nature of Services

(1.2) An AICPA Code of Conduct principle which declares that members of the public practice should observe principles of the Code.

77
New cards

Independence Rule

(1.2) An AICPA Code rule which declares that a CPA must be independent of the client they provide services for.

78
New cards

Contingent Fee Rule

(1.2) An AICPA Code rule which declares that a CPA cannot charge/receive a contingent fee for professional services from a client.

79
New cards

Commissions and Referral Fees Rule

(1.2) An AICPA Code rule which declares that a CPA cannot receive a payment from the referral of a third party’s product/service.

80
New cards

Form of Organization and Name Rule

(1.2) An AICPA Code rule which declares that a CPA can only practice in a manner allowed by state law/regulation. They cannot use a misleading name.

81
New cards

Advertising and Solicitation Rule

(1.2) An AICPA Code rule which declares that a CPA cannot use false, misleading, or deceptive advertising or solicitation.

82
New cards

Confidential Client Information Rule

(1.2) An AICPA Code rule which declares that a CPA cannot disclose client information without their consent.

83
New cards

Integrity and Objectivity Rule

(1.2) An AICPA Code rule which declares that a CPA should render services with integrity, without any conflicts of interest.

84
New cards

General Standards Rule

(1.2) An AICPA Code rule which declares that CPAs must maintain competence, due professional care, adequate planning and supervision, and obtain relevant data for conclusions/recommendations.

85
New cards

Compliance with Standards Rule/Accounting Principles Rule

(1.2) An AICPA Code rule which declares that a CPA must comply with all promulgated standards adopted by AICPA Council designees.

86
New cards

Acts Discreditable Rule

(1.2) An AICPA Code rule which declares that a CPA must not commit an act that discredits the profession.

87
New cards

Nonregulatory Ethics

(1.2) The process of making ethical choices that are not clearly defined in standards or laws of conduct.

88
New cards

End-Based Reasoning

(1.2) A form of ethical reasoning that suggests an action is “right” if it produces at least as much net good as any alternative action that could have been produced.

89
New cards

Rule-Based Reasoning

(1.2) A form of ethical reasoning which suggests that rules apply to everyone, with no exceptions.

90
New cards

Care-Based Reasoning

(1.2) A form of ethical reasoning which suggests that decisions are based on the treatment one would like to receive.

91
New cards

Ethical Professional Behavior

(1.2) The process of consistently applying honesty, integrity, and professional judgment to ensure compliance with laws and uphold trust.

92
New cards

Morality

(1.2) A form of ethical professional behavior which suggests there is a continuum of morally right and wrong accountants tread through their actions.

93
New cards

Social Responsibility

(1.2) A form of ethical professional behavior which suggests that accountants should exceed the minimum required legal responsibility to perform a social benefit through their practices.

94
New cards

Business Ethics

(1.2) A form of ethical professional behavior which suggests that judgments must be exercised for a purpose greater than simply making a profit.