1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Phase 1
Establishing the purpose
The administration usually does this
Usually a structuralist paradigm=most practical
Phase 2:
Planning
Coming up with the test specifications (TDS)
Who will be qualified and allowed to construct, administer, and check
proctor
invigilator (in british english)
Test specifications
Official statement about what the test should test and how it tests them
what are the different sections and how much percentage do they take up?
What kind of tests?
Test syllabus
external, can be shared
Phase 3
Item construction
Based on test specifications
Item Baking
a collection of test items
Phase 4
Administration
Coordination with specific agencies
Pilot testing
testing to see if there are any issues with the test and data
items must not be included in the final
Phase 5
Checking
Activity = dividing the work
who should check what
Phase 6
Analysis
Analysis and consultation with experts
Statistical tools
Phase 7
Reporting
Oral discussion
Submission of final report
Versions of final report
Stem
the question, command, or statement. Gives direction in which option to pick
Choices/alternatives/Options
the part of the item from which to choose from.
Key
The correct option
Distractors
The incorrect options
Paraphrase tests
Could be a test of grammatical structure
True or false tests
One of the most widely used for reading comprehension
Scoring is straightforward and quick
Can be constructed easily and quickly = allows for more tasks
Formative Assessment
Checking for understanding is also known as
Projects and Performances
Show how student understand the lesson, in a differentiated way
Item Difficulty and Item Discriminability
Two useful indices for analyzing test results
Item Difficulty
sed for assessing how difficult an item is
Item Difficulty
d = no of correct responses / total no of test takers
Item discriminability
Used for assessing how good an item is in showing good performers vs poor performers.
Item discriminability
D= No of correct (high group) / No of correct (high group + low group)