History final exam: 5. Miranda v. Arizona Case (1966) 6/10
Studied by 0 people
Learn
Practice Test
Spaced Repetition
Match
Flashcards1/4
There's no tags or description
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
5 Terms
It was a Supreme Court Case that established the rule that the police must inform you of your rights when you’re arrested
What was the Miranda V. Arizona case (1966)?
Ernesto Miranda was arrested and confessed to a crime without being told he had the right to stay silent or get a lawyer
Who is Ernesto Miranda in the Miranda V. Arizona case (1966)?
The Supreme Court ruled this violated the 5th amendment (protection against self-incrimination) and the 6th amendment (right to an attorney)
What did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda V. Arizona case?
“You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in court. You have the right to attorney…”
Now, if you’re arrested, police must say what?
Ernesto Miranda won. The supreme court ruled that suspects must be informed of their rights before being questioned by police
Who won the Miranda v. Arizona case?