Oligopoly (4)

Characteristics of Oligopoly

• Most markets are imperfectly competitive
  (Market structures where firms do have some market power and can influence prices i.e.monopolistic, oligopoly & monopoly)

• Most imperfectly competitive industries operate in an oligopoly (A market structure in which a few large firms dominate the industry with each firm having significant market power) market structure

  • E.g., Banks, insurance companies, department stores, supermarkets, petrol retailers, sport stores etc.

High barriers to entry and exit	High concentration ratio
Entering the industry is difficult due to the existing dominance of relatively few firms. Start-up costs tend to be high e.g. setting up a renewable energy company costs billions Leaving the industry is difficult due to the high level of (An investment that has been made that cannot be recovered) e.g. mobile phone companies are bidding billions on 5G auctions run by the Government. They cannot recoup this if they leave the industry	A concentration ratioreveals what percentage of the total market share a specific number of firms have A 10-firm concentration ratio reveals the total market share (concentration) of the top 10 firms in the industry A 5-firm concentrationreveals the total market share (concentration) of the top 5 firms in the industry The higher the value - and the lower the number of firms - the more concentrated the market power in the industry e.g. the UK supermarket's 5-firm concentration ratio is constantly around 67%
Interdependence of firms	Product differentiation
With relatively few competitors, firms study each other's behaviour and are highly interdependent in their actions This interdependence generates the use of game theory	Products tend to be highly differentiated Occasionally products are similar (e.g. petrol). However, the brand around the product is highly differentiated to the point where consumers perceive it as different and are extremely brand loyal

Calculate concentration Ratios

• The most commonly used concentration ratios (Reveals what percentage of the total market share a specific number of firms have e.g five-firm concentration ratio)in the UK are the five-firm, ten-firm, and twenty-firm concentration ratios

• A five-firm concentration ratio of around 60% is considered to be an oligopoly

• A one-firm concentration ratio of 100% would be a pure monopoly- A market structure in which there is a single seller selling a unique good/service

  • The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) defines a monopoly as a firm with more than 25% market share

    • It prevents mergers or acquisitions from taking place which would give one firm more than 25% market share

Collusive Behaviour

• Collusive behaviour in oligopolies occurs when firms cooperate to fix prices and restrict output

  • They cease to compete as vigorously as they can

Non collusive behaviour

• Non collusive behaviour in oligopolies occurs when firms actively compete to maintain/increase market share

Reasons for Collusion

Few firms/competitors	This makes it relatively easy for each firm to understand other competitors' actions and responses, or to collaborate on prices/output
Similar costs	Firms face almost identical costs as any remaining competitors have all experienced economies of scale
Similar revenue	Competitors' goods/services sell for similar prices as there is little incentive to lower them as other firms would respond by keeping their market share the same but decreasing the profits
High barriers to entry	The barriers to entry make it unlikely that new entrants will emerge to disrupt the status quo
Ineffective regulation	A lack of regulation empowers firms to collude as there is little consequence for their actions
Brand loyalty	There is usually a high degree of brand loyalty in oligopoly markets and firms have an established market share. This decreases the benefits of competition as consumers are unlikely to change brands

Types of Collusion

• Collusion can be overt or tacit

• The net effect of collusion is that a group of firms end up acting like a monopoly in the market

Overt Collusion

Overt collusion occurs when firms explicitly agree to limit competition or raise prices (price fixing)

• A cartel (Occurs when a group of firms providing the same (or substitute) products join together to limit output & raise prices e.g OPEC (oil producing exporting countries). The group effectively acts as a monopoly) is the most restrictive form of collusion and is illegal in most countries

• The consequences of overt collusion include:

  • Higher prices for consumers

  • Less output in the market

  • Poor quality products and/or customer service

  • Less investment in innovation

In what way does Overt collusion happen ?

• Overt collusion often happens in the following ways

  • Price fixing - Occurs when competitors agree a fixed price for all of their competing products & it usually higher than the market equilibrium price would be

  • Setting output quotas which limit supply and naturally results in price increases

  • Agreements to block new firms from entering the industry

  • Agreements to pay suppliers the same price thereby driving down prices in the supply chain (monopsony power) - Occurs when there is a single buyer of a good/service in a market giving the buyer considerable market power over the seller

Tacit collusion

1. Tacit collusion occurs when firms avoid formal agreements but closely monitor each other's behaviour usually following the lead of the largest firm in the industry

• The most common form of tacit collusion is price leadership or price matching

  • This occurs when firms monitor the price of the largest firm in the industry and then adjust their prices to match

  • It is difficult for regulators to prove that collusion has occurred

  • It provides similar benefits to firms as overt collusion, but perhaps not to the same degree

  • It has similar consequences for consumers as overt collusion, but perhaps not to the same degree

What is game theory ?

• Game theory is a mathematical framework which is used by firms to ensure optimal decisions are made in a strategic setting where there is a high level of interdependence (such as in oligopoly markets)

• Any game has three elements

  • The players - (firms)

  • The strategies available to the players

  • The payoffs (outcomes) that each player receives for each combination of strategies

What was game theory first illustrated using ?

• It was first illustrated using a simple model called The Prisoners Dilemma

  • Two criminals are caught after a train robbery (Carol and Doug)

    • The prosecutor does not have much evidence

    • The criminals are guilty but have agreed with each otherthat they will deny all involvement

    • The prosector wants one (or both) to confess

  • The strategies and payoffs available to the prisoners are presented in a payoff matrix

A prisoner's dilemma payoff matrix which illustrates game theory - Diagram Analysis

• If Carol and Doug stick to their plan and deny involvement, they each get 3 years jail time

• If Doug confesses and indicates Carol's involvement, then Doug gets a lenient sentence of 1 year and Carol gets 10 years

• If Carol confesses and indicates Doug's involvement, then Carol gets a lenient sentence of 1 year and Doug gets 10 years

• There is a strong incentive to collude as it will yield the most beneficial outcome for Carol and Doug (3 years each)

• Fearing the worst, both players decide to confess and receive 5 years each

  • This outcome is called the dominant strategy as it carries the least risk

How firms use game theory

• Firms typically use game theory in the following situations:

  • When making decisions to raise or lower prices

  • When making decisions about new advertising and branding initiatives

  • When making decisions about investment in product innovation

  • When making decisions on product bundling e.g. combined phone and broadband package

• Below is a payoff matrix representing the strategic options available to Burger King and McDonald's when making advertising decisions

  • The £ payoffs represent the likely profits for each combination of choices selected

A payoff matrix which illustrates the strategies and payoffs available to firms when they are deciding to advertise or not to advertise - Diagram Analysis

• If Burger King and McDonald's collude and agree not to advertise (top left), they can each enjoy £3 bn. in profits

  • There is a strong incentive to collude

• If Burger King advertises and McDonald's does not, then Burger King's profits are £5 bn. and McDonald's are £1 bn.

• If McDonald's advertises and Burger King does not, then McDonald's profits are £5 bn. and Burger King's are £1 bn.

• Both firms decide to advertise and receive £2 bn. of profits each

  • This outcome is called the dominant strategy as it carries the least risk

  • The risk of collusion is that one player will cheat and by doing so, get ahead

Price Competition

• Firms in an oligopoly market engage in three types of price competition

1. Price wars: occur when competitors repeatedly lower prices to undercut each other in an attempt to gain or increase market share. This often occurs when there is a lower level of non - price competition (Competition that is not based on price but on branding, product differentiation & marketing)  and where firms find it difficult to collude (either formal or tacit)

2. Predatory pricing: this is the practice of lowering prices when a new competitor joins the industry in order to drive them out. Prices are often lowered to a point below the cost of production. Once they have left the market, prices are raised again. This pricing strategy is usually illegal as it is anticompetitive

3. Limit pricing: occurs when firms set a limit on how high the price will go in the industry. A lower price reduces profit and disincentivize other firms from joining the industry. The greater the barriers to entry the higher the limit price is likely to be as firms are already disincentivized

Types of Non- Price Competition

• Firms engage in a wide range of non - price competition (Competition that is not based on price but on branding, product differentiation & marketing) strategies

  • The aim is to increase product differentiation, develop or increase brand loyalty, and to increase market share

A Range of Strategies Used in Non-Price Competition

Loyalty cards and rewards	Branding	Packaging	Celebrity/influencer endorsement
Corporate sponsorship e.g. Nike sponsoring Rafael Nadal	After sales service	Delivery policies	Product warranties