1/45
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
classical school
free will
deterred by chance of punishment
classical school pros
3 indirect social costs of arrest
commitment - future
attachment - personal circumstances
stigma - public image
classical school cons
fails to acknowledge individual differences, motivation and situation
enlightenment
uses rational and scientific method
absolute obedience to authority
deterrence theory
fear of punishment deters crime
research is inconclusive → capital punishment
crime prevention
CPTED and locks at stores
Baccaria
crime is deterred when there is a:
certainty of punishment
swiftness of justice
fair punishment
characterized by 4 general principles
equality
liberty - law = punishers
utilitarianism - fear = no crime
humanitarianism
positivist school
final stage of social development
uses scientific explanations
positivist school cons
weakness of methodology
fails to explain white-collar, organized, and political crime
neopositivist school
rational penal policy
systematic rehabilitation and resocialization
takes circumstances into account
neoclassical school
free will and circumstances
rational choice theory
just deserts: punishment no matter what
neoclassical vs classical
rejected 5 year minimum sentence and judicial discretion → cases now based on case
bentham
law = benefit of majority
punishment is good if it prevents more social harm than it produces
somatotyping
link body type to behaviour
phrenology
early theory
physical appearance
anthropological measurement
early theory
heredity + environment = crime
genetic research
positivists
link criminal behaviour to sex chromosome abnormalities
XYY chromosome theory
extra Y chromosome in men = criminal behaviour
contemporary biosocial theories
because we have genes and hormones we need to account for them in our studies
not scared if punishment
supernatural explanations
deterministic
rooted in religion
positivist
psychodynamic theory
freud
behaviour is an expression of internal conflict from childhood
id
instinct
uncontrolled = crime
ego
rational
superego
moral and ethical
cognition
mental process of how we make out the world
frustration-aggression theory
moral development
morality develops in stages
behavioural
learnt through positive/negative stimulus
avoidance learning - classical
punishment with undesirable behaviour
personality theory of criminality - classical
not have been conditioned to behave in a socially acceptable manner = crime
positive reinforcement - operant
token
negative reinforcement - operant
aversion therapy
auguste comte
founder of sociology
human behaviour is beyond ones control
emile durkheim
individual behaviour = social environment not instrinic
structural functionalism
all social structures work tg = stable society
consensus
functionalist
society = interrelated parts that work as one
conflict
marxist
society competing against each other
critical theory
s.i.
how criminal behaviour is learnt
imitation and interaction
durkheims strain theory
normless society
keeps undesirable human tendencies in check
mertons strain theory
conflict occurs when one is unable to achieve socially approved goals by legitimate means
5 distinct modes of adaption
agnews strain theory
can’t achieve positive goals because a negative stimuli is present
DAT
criminal behaviour is learnt through negative influences
psych and s.i. → operant conditioning and environment
primary deviance
acts countering social norms but not yet deemed deviant
secondary deviance
result from negative labels
feminist perspectives
liberal, socialist, radical, marxist, intersectional
left-realism
victimization data
all crime is serious
wanting and able to reduce crime
routine conflict theory
crime occurs when there is a motivated offender, suitable target, and absence of guardian